skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on February 25, 2026

Title: Inquiry-based learning in gateway mathematics: Its roots, status, and promise
Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is a form of active learning that engages students in cognitively demanding tasks—involving students’ attention, reasoning, problem solving, and communication. In the rest of this article, we look at IBL—past, present, and future. IBL has a storied history and a growing literature of theory and research to support its efficacy as a method for teaching for entry-level postsecondary (i.e., gateway) courses in mathematics. The 20th-century roots of teaching mathematics via IBL built a foundation for recent theory-building and for research that demonstrates how IBL teaching improves students’ mathematical proficiency, their ownership of and confidence in their own thinking and reasoning, their level of classroom engagement, and their success in mathematics class and throughout their lives. Despite this positive evidence, the mathematics teaching community faces challenges in implementing IBL in the classroom. Thus, we provide practical information on overcoming obstacles to IBL teaching, examples of IBL tasks, and tips for implementing IBL instruction. With the backing of AMATYC, its sister organizations—the American Statistical Association, the Mathematical Association of America, and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics—and the growing number of IBL practitioners and researchers, the future for IBL seems bright.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2216197
PAR ID:
10586410
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Editor(s):
Debrecht, Johanna; Alexander, George; Nabb, Keith
Publisher / Repository:
Amerixan Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges
Date Published:
Journal Name:
MathAMATYC educator
Volume:
16
Issue:
2
ISSN:
1947-279X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
4–12, 59–60
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Inquiry-based learning Gateway mathematics Cognitively demanding tasks
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Faculty professional development is an important lever for change in supporting instructors to adopt research-based instructional strategies that engage students intellectually, foster learning-supportive attitudes and habits of mind, and strengthen their persistence in mathematics. Yet the literature contains few well-rationalized models for faculty development in higher education. We describe the rationale and design for a model for discipline-based faculty development to support instructional change, and we detail our implementation of this model as applied to intensive workshops on inquiry-based learning (IBL) in college mathematics. These workshops seek to foster post-secondary mathematics instructors’ adoption of IBL, to help them adapt inquiry approaches for their classrooms, and ultimately to increase student learning and persistence in science and mathematics. Based on observed faculty needs, four strands of activity help instructors develop a mental model for an IBL classroom, adapt that model to their teaching context, develop facilitation and task-design skills, and plan an IBL mathematics course. Evaluation data from surveys and observations illustrate participant responses to the workshop and its components. The model has been robust across 15 years of workshops implemented by three generations of workshop leaders and its features make it adaptive, strategic, and practical for other faculty developers. 
    more » « less
  2. It is important to understand teachers’ views about problem-posing (PP) tasks and the prompts that are used in such tasks to engage students in posing problems. In this study, we explored 15 middle school mathematics teachers’ views about PP prompts. We found that the teachers’ views were motivated by their curricular reasoning around engaging and challenging their students and addressed five main prompt characteristics: openness, promoting critical thinking, providing scaffolding, more or less intimidating, and allowing for differentiation. The teachers’ reasoning suggested they attended to how PP can create opportunities for sensemaking, deepen students’ learning of mathematics, and foster students’ identities as creative doers of mathematics. How- ever, they did not address connecting students’ life experiences to mathematics, another key goal of teaching mathematics through PP. The findings have implications for curriculum developers and researchers regarding the design of PP tasks and the implementation of such tasks in the classroom, and they suggest several directions for future research. 
    more » « less
  3. Cook, S; Katz, B; Moore-Russo, D (Ed.)
    In this report, we share the design of a year-long professional development program for university math instructors that we developed and refined as the Anti-deficit Learning and Teaching Project (Adelante). The program is a community learning project wherein minoritized students, STEM peer mentors, and math instructors (graduate students and instructional faculty) build relationships as they share their knowledge and experiences with race, gender, and mathematics. Culturally relevant pedagogy (Ladson-Billing, 1995) frames the goals of the community learning in terms of deep mathematical knowledge, cultural knowledge, and sociopolitical consciousness. The program activities are inspired by the Funds of Knowledge for Teaching project (Moll et al., 1992) wherein teachers are offered opportunities to build meaningful relationships with students and their communities. An anti-deficit perspective (Adiredja et al., 2020) guides the learning experience for all participants. Not only are minoritized students assumed to have cultural and intellectual assets for learning, but the project also aims to dismantle deficit master narratives (Solórzano & Yosso, 2002) about these students and their capacity to learn. Instructors worked on explicitly challenging deficit narratives about their students as they engaged in the program’s activities. The project also takes an anti-deficit approach to instructor development, focusing on their individual growth and agency, joy in teaching, and mental health. We also position ourselves as learners to the experience and wisdom of the staff and students at the university cultural centers. The core activities for the PD engage teachers to: (a) participate in five PD meetings on anti- deficit teaching and Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) teaching method; (b) lead a five-day math summer bridge workshop in Pre-Calculus, Calculus I, II, Vector Calculus, or Linear Algebra immediately following the meetings; (c) participate in critical conversations about race and gender in STEM with students at the cultural centers; (d) conduct a semi-structure interview with one of their students from the summer workshop about their STEM experience; and (e) participate in group reflection meetings debriefing their experience in the activities. Preliminary analysis of two of the three cohorts of participants found that most instructors developed a more humanizing approach to their teaching and their students (Gutiérrez, 2018). IBL helped instructors to explicitly challenge deficit narratives about minoritized students in the classroom, wherein most observed their students engaging in deep mathematical reasoning. Interviewing one of their students also shifted deficit narratives that developed in the classroom for some instructors. The workshop served as a space to try out previously learned teaching ideas (student centered teaching) without constraints from curriculum and assessments. Doing so reinvigorated many instructors’ passion for teaching, especially those who are more experienced. 
    more » « less
  4. This study explores the integration of culturally responsive mathematical modeling (CRMM) in primary grades to promote racial justice and critical consciousness. The research focuses on how CRMM can support problem-based learning (PBL) by engaging students in analyzing real-world issues through mathematics. CRMM leverages students' cultural knowledge, identities, and experiences to critically examine and address social justice issues, such as racial representation in classroom libraries. The study utilizes a case study approach to investigate the supports and challenges faced by two primary grade teachers in designing and implementing a CRMM task, the Library Diversity Project. This project aimed to evaluate and improve the fairness of classroom library collections by analyzing the representation of different racial and cultural groups in children's books. The research highlights the importance of collegial support, critical reflection, and the use of specific pedagogical tools, such as decision matrices and graphical representations, in facilitating CRMM. Key findings indicate that CRMM tasks can cultivate critical awareness and empathy among students, enabling them to take action to address inequities. The study also unveils the complexity of implementing CRMM, particularly in navigating political, contextual, and mathematical challenges. Teachers' critical reflexivity and collaboration were essential in addressing these challenges and fostering a learning environment that allowed students to use mathematics to analyze an issue and take action. The research contributes to the literature on equity-focused mathematics education by providing empirical evidence of the potential of CRMM to promote social justice in the primary grades. It emphasizes the need for ongoing professional development and support for teachers to effectively integrate CRMM into their practice. The study concludes with recommendations for future research and practice in culturally responsive mathematics teaching. 
    more » « less
  5. Christiansen, I (Ed.)
    Despite the importance of reasoning and proving in mathematics and mathematics education, little is known about how future teachers become proficient in integrating reasoning and proving in their teaching practices. In this article, we characterize this aspect of prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ (PSTs’) professional learning by drawing upon the commognitive theory. We offer a triple-layer conceptualization of (student)learning,teaching, andlearning to teachmathematics via reasoning and proving by focusing on the discourses students participate in (learning), the opportunities for reasoning and proving afforded to them (teaching), and how PSTs design and enrich such opportunities (learning to teach). We explore PSTs’ pedagogical discourse anchored in the lesson plans they designed, enacted, and modified as part of their participation in a university-based course:Mathematical Reasoning and Proving for Secondary Teachers. We identified four types of discursive modifications: structural, mathematical, reasoning-based, and logic-based. We describe how the potential opportunities for reasoning and proving afforded to students by these lesson plans changed as a result of these modifications. Based on our triple-layered conceptualization we illustrate how the lesson modifications and the resulting alterations to student learning opportunities can be used to characterize PSTs’ professional learning. We discuss the affordances of theorizing teacher practices with the same theoretical lens (grounded in commognition) to inquire student learning and teacher learning, and how lesson plans, as a proxy of teaching practices, can be used as a methodological tool to better understand PSTs’ professional learning. 
    more » « less