More Like this

1. Monolepton production in SMEFT to $$ \mathcal{O} $$(1/Λ4) and beyond

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)124  

   Kim, Taegyun; Martin, Adam (September 2022, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A bstract We calculate pp → ℓ + ν, ℓ − $$ \overline{\nu} $$ ν ¯ to $$ \mathcal{O} $$ O (1 / Λ 4 ) within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) framework. In particular, we calculate the four-fermion contribution from dimension six and eight operators, which dominates at large center of mass energy. We explore the relative size of the $$ \mathcal{O} $$ O (1 / Λ 4 ) and $$ \mathcal{O} $$ O (1 / Λ 2 ) results for various kinematic regimes and assumptions about the Wilson coefficients. Results for Drell-Yan production pp → ℓ + ℓ − at $$ \mathcal{O} $$ O (1 / Λ 4 ) are also provided. Additionally, we develop the form for four fermion contact term contributions to pp → ℓ + ν, ℓ − $$ \overline{\nu} $$ ν ¯ , pp → ℓ + ℓ − of arbitrary mass dimension. This allows us to estimate the effects from even higher dimensional (dimension > 8) terms in the SMEFT framework. 

   more » « less
2. Constraints on standard model effective field theory for a Higgs boson produced in association with W or Z bosons in the H → $$ \textrm{b}\overline{\textrm{b}} $$ decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 13 TeV

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2025)114  

   Chekhovsky, V; Hayrapetyan, A; Makarenko, V; Tumasyan, A; Adam, W; Andrejkovic, J W; Benato, L; Bergauer, T; Chatterjee, S; Damanakis, K; et al (March 2025, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> A standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) analysis with dimension-six operators probing nonresonant new physics effects is performed in the Higgs-strahlung process, where the Higgs boson is produced in association with a W or Z boson, in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The final states in which the W or Z boson decays leptonically and the Higgs boson decays to a pair of bottom quarks are considered. The analyzed data were collected by the CMS experiment between 2016 and 2018 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb⁻¹. An approach designed to simultaneously optimize the sensitivity to Wilson coefficients of multiple SMEFT operators is employed. Likelihood scans as functions of the Wilson coefficients that carry SMEFT sensitivity in this final state are performed for different expansions in SMEFT. The results are consistent with the predictions of the standard model. 

   more » « less
3. A case study of SMEFT $$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ effects in diboson processes: pp → W±(ℓ±ν)γ

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)223  

   Martin, Adam (May 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> In this paper we explorepp→W^±(ℓ^±ν)γto$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$in the SMEFT expansion. Calculations to this order are necessary to properly capture SMEFT contributions that grow with energy, as the interference between energy-enhanced SMEFT effects at$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^2\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^2\right)$and the Standard Model is suppressed. We find that there are several dimension eight operators that interfere with the Standard Model and lead to the same energy growth, ~$$ \mathcal{O}\left({E}^4/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(E^4/{\Lambda }^4\right)$, as dimension six squared. While energy-enhanced SMEFT contributions are a main focus, our calculation includes the complete set of$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$SMEFT effects consistent with U(3)⁵flavor symmetry. Additionally, we include the decay of theW^±→ ℓ^±ν, making the calculation actually$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$. As such, we are able to study the impact of non-resonant SMEFT operators, such as$$ \left({L}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\mu }{\tau}^IL\right)\left({Q}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\nu }{\tau}^IQ\right) $$ $\left(L^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\mu }{\tau }^{I}L\right)\left(Q^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\nu }{\tau }^{I}Q\right)$B_μν, which contribute to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$directly and not to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {W}^{\pm}\gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to W^{\pm }\gamma$. We show several distributions to illustrate the shape differences of the different contributions. 

   more » « less
4. Higgs associated production with a vector decaying to two fermions in the geoSMEFT

   https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.1.019  

   Corbett, Tyler; Martin, Adam (January 2024, SciPost Physics)

   We present the inclusive calculations of a Higgs boson produced in association with massive vector bosons in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) to order1/\Lambda^4 $1/{\Lambda }^4$for the 13 TeV LHC. The calculations include the decay of the vector boson into massless constituents and are done using the geometric formulation of the SMEFT supplemented by the relevant dimension eight operators not included in the geoSMEFT. We include some discussion of distributions to motivate how detailed collider and experimental searches for SMEFT signals could be improved. 

   more » « less
5. Differential cross-section measurements of Higgs boson production in the H → τ+τ− decay channel in pp collisions at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2025)010  

   Aad, G; Aakvaag, E; Abbott, B; Abdelhameed, S; Abeling, K; Abicht, N J; Abidi, S H; Aboelela, M; Aboulhorma, A; Abramowicz, H; et al (March 2025, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> Differential measurements of Higgs boson production in theτ-lepton-pair decay channel are presented in the gluon fusion, vector-boson fusion (VBF),VHand$$ t\overline{t}H $$ $t\overline{t}H$associated production modes, with particular focus on the VBF production mode. The data used to perform the measurements correspond to 140 fb⁻¹of proton-proton collisions collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Two methods are used to perform the measurements: theSimplified Template Cross-Section(STXS) approach and anUnfolded Fiducial Differentialmeasurement considering only the VBF phase space. For the STXS measurement, events are categorized by their production mode and kinematic properties such as the Higgs boson’s transverse momentum ($$ {p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{H}} $$ $p_T^H$), the number of jets produced in association with the Higgs boson, or the invariant mass of the two leading jets (m_jj). For the VBF production mode, the ratio of the measured cross-section to the Standard Model prediction form_jj> 1.5 TeV and$$ {p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{H}} $$ $p_T^H$> 200 GeV ($$ {p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{H}} $$ $p_T^H$< 200 GeV) is$$ {1.29}_{-0.34}^{+0.39} $$ ${1.29}_{-0.34}^{+0.39}$($$ {0.12}_{-0.33}^{+0.34} $$ ${0.12}_{-0.33}^{+0.34}$). This is the first VBF measurement for the higher-$$ {p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{H}} $$ $p_T^H$criteria, and the most precise for the lower-$$ {p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{H}} $$ $p_T^H$criteria. Thefiducialcross-section measurements, which only consider the kinematic properties of the event, are performed as functions of variables characterizing the VBF topology, such as the signed ∆ϕ_jjbetween the two leading jets. The measurements have a precision of 30%–50% and agree well with the Standard Model predictions. These results are interpreted in the SMEFT framework, and place the strongest constraints to date on the CP-odd Wilson coefficient$$ {c}_{H\overset{\sim }{W}} $$ $c_{H\tilde{W}}$. 

   more » « less