An official website of the United States government
Moving cells can sense and respond to physical features of the microenvironment; however, in vivo, the significance of tissue topography is mostly unknown. Here, we usedDrosophilaborder cells, an established model for in vivo cell migration, to study how chemical and physical information influences path selection. Although chemical cues were thought to be sufficient, live imaging, genetics, modeling, and simulations show that microtopography is also important. Chemoattractants promote predominantly posterior movement, whereas tissue architecture presents orthogonal information, a path of least resistance concentrated near the center of the egg chamber. E-cadherin supplies a permissive haptotactic cue. Our results provide insight into how cells integrate and prioritize topographical, adhesive, and chemoattractant cues to choose one path among many.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on March 1, 2026
Chemotaxis of Drosophila border cells is modulated by tissue geometry through dispersion of chemoattractants
Cell migration is critical throughout a multicellular organism’s life from embryogenesis to immune response and tissue repair and can even go aberrantly wrong in diseases like metastatic cancer. In vitro, graded concentrations of diffusible chemoattractants can guide migrating cells, but less is known about chemoattractant distribution and chemotaxis within living organisms, which have complex tissue geometries. Using the border cells, which migrate collectively in the Drosophila egg chamber during oogenesis, we studied how tissue structure affects chemotaxis in vivo. Live-imaged border cells exhibited variations in their chemotactic migration, which correlated positionally within distinct tissue architectures, specifically acellular gaps at cell-cell intersections. To determine how different regions in the egg chamber’s geometry affect chemical cues, we developed a partial differential equation (PDE) model of chemoattractant distribution within a relevant in silico domain. Using a hybrid mathematical model that couples the chemoattractant PDE and an agent-based motion of the cluster, we found that larger extracellular volumes within intersections could locally dampen chemoattractant gradient magnitudes and slow cluster speed in simulations. In vivo, in response to genetically increasing the levels of a chemoattractant, PDGF- and VEGF-related factor 1, border cells exhibited delayed migration and behaved differently within specific architectural regions, consistent with results in silico. We next altered the architectural regions in the migration domain in half pint (hfp) mutant egg chambers and observed migration behaviors that still correlated with tissue features. Importantly, the abnormal tissue geometry was sufficient to rescue defects due to high levels of chemoattractant and resulted in punctual border cell migration indicating chemoattractant distribution can depend on tissue structure. Our modeling data indicate that chemoattractants are more concentrated in certain tissue architectures and dispersed in other regions, likely informing cell migration speeds and favoring clustered cell movements in tissue that contain varied architectures in vivo. Our results shed light on the intricate interplay between tissue geometry and the local distribution of important signaling molecules in orchestrating the essential process of cell migration.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2303857
- PAR ID:
- 10594258
- Publisher / Repository:
- Cell Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- iScience
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 2589-0042
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 111959
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Bergstralh, D (Ed.)Abstract Collective cell migration is critical to embryonic development, wound healing, and the immune response, but also drives tumor dissemination. Understanding how cell collectives coordinate migration in vivo has been a challenge, with potential therapeutic benefits that range from addressing developmental defects to designing targeted cancer treatments. The small GTPase Rap1 has emerged as a regulator of both embryogenesis and cancer cell migration. How active Rap1 coordinates downstream signaling functions required for coordinated collective migration is poorly understood. Drosophila border cells undergo a stereotyped and genetically tractable in vivo migration within the developing egg chamber of the ovary. This group of 6–8 cells migrates through a densely packed tissue microenvironment and serves as an excellent model for collective cell migration during development and disease. Rap1, like all small GTPases, has distinct activity state switches that link extracellular signals to organized cell behaviors. Proper regulation of Rap1 activity is essential for successful border cell migration yet the signaling partners and other downstream effectors are poorly characterized. Using the known requirement for Rap1 in border cell migration, we conducted a dominant suppressor screen for genes whose heterozygous loss modifies the migration defects observed upon constitutively active Rap1V12 expression. Here, we identified 7 genomic regions on the X chromosome that interact with Rap1V12. We mapped three genomic regions to single Rap1-interacting genes, frizzled 4, Ubiquitin-specific protease 16/45, and strawberry notch. Thus, this unbiased screening approach identified multiple new candidate regulators of Rap1 activity with roles in collective border cell migration.more » « less
-
Abstract Collective migration of epithelial cells drives diverse tissue remodeling processes. In many cases, a free tissue edge polarizes the cells to promote directed motion, but how edge-free or closed epithelia initiate migration remains unclear. Here, we show that the rotational migration of follicular epithelial cells in theDrosophilaegg chamber is a self-organizing process. Combining experiments and theoretical modeling, we identify a positive feedback loop in which the mechanosensitive behavior of the atypical cadherin Fat2 synergizes with the rigid-body dynamics of the egg chamber to both initiate and sustain rotation. Mechanical constraints arising from cell–cell interactions and tissue geometry further align this motion around the egg chamber’s anterior–posterior axis. Our findings reveal a biophysical mechanism — combining Fat2-mediated velocity–polarity alignment, rigid-body dynamics, and tissue geometry — by which a closed epithelial tissue self-organizes into persistent, large-scale rotational migrationin vivo, expanding current flocking theories.more » « less
-
Abstract BackgroundCollective cell migration underlies many essential processes, including sculpting organs during embryogenesis, wound healing in the adult, and metastasis of cancer cells. At mid-oogenesis,Drosophilaborder cells undergo collective migration. Border cells round up into a small group at the pre-migration stage, detach from the epithelium and undergo a dynamic and highly regulated migration at the mid-migration stage, and stop at the oocyte, their final destination, at the post-migration stage. While specific genes that promote cell signaling, polarization of the cluster, formation of protrusions, and cell-cell adhesion are known to regulate border cell migration, there may be additional genes that promote these distinct active phases of border cell migration. Therefore, we sought to identify genes whose expression patterns changed during border cell migration. ResultsWe performed RNA-sequencing on border cells isolated at pre-, mid-, and post-migration stages. We report that 1,729 transcripts, in nine co-expression gene clusters, are temporally and differentially expressed across the three migration stages. Gene ontology analyses and constructed protein-protein interaction networks identified genes expected to function in collective migration, such as regulators of the cytoskeleton, adhesion, and tissue morphogenesis, but also uncovered a notable enrichment of genes involved in immune signaling, ribosome biogenesis, and stress responses. Finally, we validated the in vivo expression and function of a subset of identified genes in border cells. ConclusionsOverall, our results identified differentially and temporally expressed genetic networks that may facilitate the efficient development and migration of border cells. The genes identified here represent a wealth of new candidates to investigate the molecular nature of dynamic collective cell migrations in developing tissues.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)The highly controlled migration of neutrophils toward the site of an infection can be altered when they are trained with lipopolysaccharides (LPS), with high dose LPS enhancing neutrophil migratory pattern toward the bacterial derived source signal and super-low dose LPS inducing either migration toward an intermediary signal or dysregulation and oscillatory movement. Empirical studies that use microfluidic chemotaxis-chip devices with two opposing chemoattractants showed differential neutrophil migration after challenge with different LPS doses. The epigenetic alterations responsible for changes in neutrophil migratory behavior are unknown. We developed two mathematical models that evaluate the mechanistic interactions responsible for neutrophil migratory decision-making when exposed to competing chemoattractants and challenged with LPS. The first model, which considers the interactions between the receptor densities of two competing chemoattractants, their kinases, and LPS, displayed bistability between high and low ratios of primary to intermediary chemoattractant receptor densities. In particular, at equilibrium, we observe equal receptor densities for low LPS (< 15ng/mL); and dominance of receptors for the primary chemoattractant for high LPS (> 15ng/mL). The second model, which included additional interactions with an extracellular signal-regulated kinase in both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms, has an additional dynamic outcome, oscillatory dynamics for both receptors, as seen in the data. In particular, it found equal receptor densities in the absence of oscillation for super-low and high LPS challenge (< 0.4 and 1.1 <LPS< 375 ng/mL); equal receptor densities with oscillatory receptor dynamics for super-low LPS (0.5 < LPS< 1.1ng/mL); and dominance of receptors for the primary chemoattractant for super-high LPS (>376 ng/mL). Predicting the mechanisms and the type of external LPS challenge responsible for neutrophils migration toward pro-inflammatory chemoattractants, migration toward pro-tolerant chemoattractants, or oscillatory movement is necessary knowledge in designing interventions against immune diseases, such as sepsis.more » « less
