Title: Heavy-Traffic Optimal Size- and State-Aware Dispatching
Dispatching systems, where arriving jobs are immediately assigned to one of multiple queues, are ubiquitous in computer systems and service systems. A natural and practically relevant model is one in which each queue serves jobs in FCFS (First-Come First-Served) order. We consider the case where the dispatcher is size-aware, meaning it learns the size (i.e. service time) of each job as it arrives; and state-aware, meaning it always knows the amount of work (i.e. total remaining service time) at each queue. While size- and state-aware dispatching to FCFS queues has been extensively studied, little is known about optimal dispatching for the objective of minimizing mean delay. A major obstacle is that no nontrivial lower bound on mean delay is known, even in heavy traffic (i.e. the limit as load approaches capacity). This makes it difficult to prove that any given policy is optimal, or even heavy-traffic optimal. In this work, we propose the first size- and state-aware dispatching policy that provably minimizes mean delay in heavy traffic. Our policy, called CARD (Controlled Asymmetry Reduces Delay), keeps all but one of the queues short, then routes as few jobs as possible to the one long queue. We prove an upper bound on CARD's mean delay, and we prove the first nontrivial lower bound on the mean delay of any size- and state-aware dispatching policy. Both results apply to any number of servers. Our bounds match in heavy traffic, implying CARD's heavy-traffic optimality. In particular, CARD's heavy-traffic performance improves upon that of LWL (Least Work Left), SITA (Size Interval Task Assignment), and other policies from the literature whose heavy-traffic performance is known. more »« less
Choudhury, Tuhinangshu; Joshi, Gauri; Wang, Weina; Shakkottai, Sanjay
(, ACM MobiHoc: International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks)
null
(Ed.)
In multi-server queueing systems where there is no central queue holding all incoming jobs, job dispatching policies are used to assign incoming jobs to the queue at one of the servers. Classic job dispatching policies such as join-the-shortest-queue and shortest expected delay assume that the service rates and queue lengths of the servers are known to the dispatcher. In this work, we tackle the problem of job dispatching without the knowledge of service rates and queue lengths, where the dispatcher can only obtain noisy estimates of the service rates by observing job departures. This problem presents a novel exploration-exploitation trade-off between sending jobs to all the servers to estimate their service rates, and exploiting the currently known fastest servers to minimize the expected queueing delay. We propose a bandit-based exploration policy that learns the service rates from observed job departures. Unlike the standard multi-armed bandit problem where only one out of a finite set of actions is optimal, here the optimal policy requires identifying the optimal fraction of incoming jobs to be sent to each server. We present a regret analysis and simulations to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed bandit-based exploration policy.
The shortest-remaining-processing-time (SRPT) scheduling policy has been extensively studied, for more than 50 years, in single-server queues with infinitely patient jobs. Yet, much less is known about its performance in multiserver queues. In this paper, we present the first theoretical analysis of SRPT in multiserver queues with abandonment. In particular, we consider the M/GI/s+GI queue and demonstrate that, in the many-sever overloaded regime, performance in the SRPT queue is equivalent, asymptotically in steady state, to a preemptive two-class priority queue where customers with short service times (below a threshold) are served without wait, and customers with long service times (above a threshold) eventually abandon without service. We prove that the SRPT discipline maximizes, asymptotically, the system throughput, among all scheduling disciplines. We also compare the performance of the SRPT policy to blind policies and study the effects of the patience-time and service-time distributions. This paper was accepted by Baris Ata, stochastic models & simulation.
Harlev, Amit; Yu, George; Scully, Ziv
(, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems)
We consider the problem of scheduling to minimize asymptotic tail latency in an M/G/1 queue with unknown job sizes. When the job size distribution is heavy-tailed, numerous policies that do not require job size information (e.g. Processor Sharing, Least Attained Service) are known to be strongly tail optimal, meaning that their response time tail has the fastest possible asymptotic decay. In contrast, for light-tailed size distributions, only in the last few years have policies been developed that outperform simple First-Come First-Served (FCFS). The most recent of these is γ-Boost, which achieves strong tail optimality in the light-tailed setting. But thus far, all policies that outperform FCFS in the light-tailed setting, including γ-Boost, require known job sizes. In this paper, we design a new scheduling policy that achieves strong tail optimality in the light-tailed M/G/1 with unknown job sizes. Surprisingly, the optimal policy turns out to be a variant of the Gittins policy, but with a novel and unusual feature: it uses a negative discount rate. Our work also applies to systems with partial information about job sizes, covering γ-Boost as an extreme case when job sizes are in fact fully known.
Banerjee, Sayan; Budhiraja, Amarjit; Estevez, Benjamin
(, Mathematics of Operations Research)
Consider a queuing system with K parallel queues in which the server for each queue processes jobs at rate n and the total arrival rate to the system is [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and n is large. Interarrival and service times are taken to be independent and exponentially distributed. It is well known that the join-the-shortest-queue (JSQ) policy has many desirable load-balancing properties. In particular, in comparison with uniformly at random routing, the time asymptotic total queue-length of a JSQ system, in the heavy traffic limit, is reduced by a factor of K. However, this decrease in total queue-length comes at the price of a high communication cost of order [Formula: see text] because at each arrival instant, the state of the full K-dimensional system needs to be queried. In view of this, it is of interest to study alternative routing policies that have lower communication costs and yet have similar load-balancing properties as JSQ. In this work, we study a family of such rank-based routing policies, which we will call Marginal Size Bias Load-Balancing policies, in which [Formula: see text] of the incoming jobs are routed to servers with probabilities depending on their ranked queue length and the remaining jobs are routed uniformly at random. A particular case of such routing schemes, referred to as the marginal JSQ (MJSQ) policy, is one in which all the [Formula: see text] jobs are routed using the JSQ policy. Our first result provides a heavy traffic approximation theorem for such queuing systems in terms of reflected diffusions in the positive orthant [Formula: see text]. It turns out that, unlike the JSQ system, where, due to a state space collapse, the heavy traffic limit is characterized by a one-dimensional reflected Brownian motion, in the setting of MJSQ (and for the more general rank-based routing schemes), there is no state space collapse, and one obtains a novel diffusion limit which is the constrained analogue of the well-studied Atlas model (and other rank-based diffusions) that arise from certain problems in mathematical finance. Next, we prove an interchange of limits ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) result which shows that, under conditions, the steady state of the queuing system is well approximated by that of the limiting diffusion. It turns out that the latter steady state can be given explicitly in terms of product laws of Exponential random variables. Using these explicit formulae, and the interchange of limits result, we compute the time asymptotic total queue-length in the heavy traffic limit for the MJSQ system. We find the striking result that, although in going from JSQ to MJSQ, the communication cost is reduced by a factor of [Formula: see text], the steady-state heavy traffic total queue-length increases by at most a constant factor (independent of n, K) which can be made arbitrarily close to one by increasing a MJSQ parameter. We also study the case where the system is overloaded—namely, [Formula: see text]. For this case, we show that although the K-dimensional MJSQ system is unstable, unlike the setting of random routing, the system has certain desirable and quantifiable load-balancing properties. In particular, by establishing a suitable interchange of limits result, we show that the steady-state difference between the maximum and the minimum queue lengths stays bounded in probability (in the heavy traffic parameter n). Funding: Financial support from the National Science Foundation [RTG Award DMS-2134107] is gratefully acknowledged. S. Banerjee received financial support from the National Science Foundation [NSF-CAREER Award DMS-2141621]. A. Budhiraja received financial support from the National Science Foundation [Grant DMS-2152577].
Grosof, Isaac; Scully, Ziv; Harchol-Balter, Mor; Scheller-Wolf, Alan
(, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems)
Multiserver-job systems, where jobs require concurrent service at many servers, occur widely in practice. Essentially all of the theoretical work on multiserver-job systems focuses on maximizing utilization, with almost nothing known about mean response time. In simpler settings, such as various known-size single-server-job settings, minimizing mean response time is merely a matter of prioritizing small jobs. However, for the multiserver-job system, prioritizing small jobs is not enough, because we must also ensure servers are not unnecessarily left idle. Thus, minimizing mean response time requires prioritizing small jobs while simultaneously maximizing throughput. Our question is how to achieve these joint objectives. We devise the ServerFilling-SRPT scheduling policy, which is the first policy to minimize mean response time in the multiserver-job model in the heavy traffic limit. In addition to proving this heavy-traffic result, we present empirical evidence that ServerFilling-SRPT outperforms all existing scheduling policies for all loads, with improvements by orders of magnitude at higher loads. Because ServerFilling-SRPT requires knowing job sizes, we also define the ServerFilling-Gittins policy, which is optimal when sizes are unknown or partially known.
Xie, Runhan, Grosof, Isaac, and Scully, Ziv. Heavy-Traffic Optimal Size- and State-Aware Dispatching. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems 8.1 Web. doi:10.1145/3639035.
Xie, Runhan, Grosof, Isaac, & Scully, Ziv. Heavy-Traffic Optimal Size- and State-Aware Dispatching. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3639035
Xie, Runhan, Grosof, Isaac, and Scully, Ziv.
"Heavy-Traffic Optimal Size- and State-Aware Dispatching". Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems 8 (1). Country unknown/Code not available: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3639035.https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10604493.
@article{osti_10604493,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
title = {Heavy-Traffic Optimal Size- and State-Aware Dispatching},
url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10604493},
DOI = {10.1145/3639035},
abstractNote = {Dispatching systems, where arriving jobs are immediately assigned to one of multiple queues, are ubiquitous in computer systems and service systems. A natural and practically relevant model is one in which each queue serves jobs in FCFS (First-Come First-Served) order. We consider the case where the dispatcher is size-aware, meaning it learns the size (i.e. service time) of each job as it arrives; and state-aware, meaning it always knows the amount of work (i.e. total remaining service time) at each queue. While size- and state-aware dispatching to FCFS queues has been extensively studied, little is known about optimal dispatching for the objective of minimizing mean delay. A major obstacle is that no nontrivial lower bound on mean delay is known, even in heavy traffic (i.e. the limit as load approaches capacity). This makes it difficult to prove that any given policy is optimal, or even heavy-traffic optimal. In this work, we propose the first size- and state-aware dispatching policy that provably minimizes mean delay in heavy traffic. Our policy, called CARD (Controlled Asymmetry Reduces Delay), keeps all but one of the queues short, then routes as few jobs as possible to the one long queue. We prove an upper bound on CARD's mean delay, and we prove the first nontrivial lower bound on the mean delay of any size- and state-aware dispatching policy. Both results apply to any number of servers. Our bounds match in heavy traffic, implying CARD's heavy-traffic optimality. In particular, CARD's heavy-traffic performance improves upon that of LWL (Least Work Left), SITA (Size Interval Task Assignment), and other policies from the literature whose heavy-traffic performance is known.},
journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)},
author = {Xie, Runhan and Grosof, Isaac and Scully, Ziv},
}
Warning: Leaving National Science Foundation Website
You are now leaving the National Science Foundation website to go to a non-government website.
Website:
NSF takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the views expressed or the accuracy of
the information contained on this site. Also be aware that NSF's privacy policy does not apply to this site.
An official website of the United States government
