More Like this

1. Incorporating Taxonomic Reasoning and Regulatory Knowledge into Automated Privacy Question Answering

   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0579-8_31  

   Ravichander, Abhilasha; Yang, Ian; Chen, Rex; Wilson, Shomir; Norton, Thomas; Sadeh, Norman (November 2024, Springer Nature Singapore)

   Privacy policies are often lengthy and complex legal documents, and are difficult for many people to read and comprehend. Recent research efforts have explored automated assistants that process the language in policies and answer people’s privacy questions. This study documents the importance of two different types of reasoning necessary to generate accurate answers to people’s privacy questions. The first is the need to support taxonomic reasoning about related terms commonly found in privacy policies. The second is the need to reason about regulatory disclosure requirements, given the prevalence of silence in privacy policy texts. Specifically, we report on a study involving the collection of 749 sets of expert annotations to answer privacy questions in the context of 210 different policy/question pairs. The study highlights the importance of taxonomic reasoning and of reasoning about regulatory disclosure requirements when it comes to accurately answering everyday privacy questions. Next we explore to what extent current generative AI tools are able to reliably handle this type of reasoning. Our results suggest that in their current form and in the absence of additional help, current models cannot reliably support the type of reasoning about regulatory disclosure requirements necessary to accurately answer privacy questions. We proceed to introduce and evaluate different approaches to improving their performance. Through this work, we aim to provide a richer understanding of the capabilities automated systems need to have to provide accurate answers to everyday privacy questions and, in the process, outline paths for adapting AI models for this purpose. 

   more » « less
2. Tutorial: Causal AI for Web and Health Care.

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3543873.3587713  

   Usha Lokala, Kaushik Roy (April 2023, Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference)

   Improving the performance and explanations of ML algorithms is a priority for adoption by humans in the real world. In critical domains such as healthcare, such technology has significant potential to reduce the burden on humans and considerably reduce manual assessments by providing quality assistance at scale. In today’s data-driven world, artificial intelligence (AI) systems are still experiencing issues with bias, explainability, and human-like reasoning and interpretability. Causal AI is the technique that can reason and make human-like choices making it possible to go beyond narrow Machine learning-based techniques and can be integrated into human decision-making. It also offers intrinsic explainability, new domain adaptability, bias free predictions, and works with datasets of all sizes. In this tutorial of type lecture style, we detail how a richer representation of causality in AI systems using a knowledge graph (KG) based approach is needed for intervention and counterfactual reasoning (Figure 1), how do we get to model-based and domain explainability, how causal representations helps in web and health care. 

   more » « less
3. Edited Media Understanding: Reasoning About Implications of Manipulated Images

   Da, Jeff; Forbes, Maxwell; Zellers, Rowan; Zheng, Anthony; Hwang, Jena D.; Bosselut, Antoine; Choi, Yejin (December 2020, Association for Computational Linguistics)

   Multimodal disinformation, from `deepfakes' to simple edits that deceive, is an important societal problem. Yet at the same time, the vast majority of media edits are harmless -- such as a filtered vacation photo. The difference between this example, and harmful edits that spread disinformation, is one of intent. Recognizing and describing this intent is a major challenge for today's AI systems. We present the task of Edited Media Understanding, requiring models to answer open-ended questions that capture the intent and implications of an image edit. We introduce a dataset for our task, EMU, with 48k question-answer pairs written in rich natural language. We evaluate a wide variety of vision-and-language models for our task, and introduce a new model PELICAN, which builds upon recent progress in pretrained multimodal representations. Our model obtains promising results on our dataset, with humans rating its answers as accurate 40.35% of the time. At the same time, there is still much work to be done -- humans prefer human-annotated captions 93.56% of the time -- and we provide analysis that highlights areas for further progress. 

   more » « less
4. Social-IQ: A Question Answering Benchmark for Artificial Social Intelligence

   Zadeh, Amir; Chan, Michael; Liang, Paul Pu; Tong, Edmund; Morency, Louis-Philippe (January 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR))

   As intelligent systems increasingly blend into our everyday life, artificial social intelligence becomes a prominent area of research. Intelligent systems must be socially intelligent in order to comprehend human intents and maintain a rich level of interaction with humans. Human language offers a unique unconstrained approach to probe through questions and reason through answers about social situations. This unconstrained approach extends previous attempts to model social intelligence through numeric supervision (e.g. sentiment and emotions labels). In this paper, we introduce the Social-IQ, an unconstrained benchmark specifically designed to train and evaluate socially intelligent technologies. By providing a rich source of open-ended questions and answers, Social-IQ opens the door to explainable social intelligence. The dataset contains rigorously annotated and validated videos, questions and answers, as well as annotations for the complexity level of each question and answer. Social- IQ contains 1, 250 natural in-thewild social situations, 7, 500 questions and 52, 500 correct and incorrect answers. Although humans can reason about social situations with very high accuracy (95.08%), existing state-of-the-art computational models struggle on this task. As a result, Social-IQ brings novel challenges that will spark future research in social intelligence modeling, visual reasoning, and multimodal question answering (QA). 

   more » « less
5. Communicating Natural Programs to Humans and Machines

   Acquaviva, Sam; Pu, Yewen; Kryven, Marta; Wong, Catherine; Ecanow, Gabrielle E; Nye, Max; Sechopoulos, Theodoros; Tessler, Michael Henry; Tenenbaum, Joshua B (June 2021, ArXivorg)

   null (Ed.)

   The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) is a set of tasks that tests an agent’s ability to flexibly solve novel problems. While most ARC tasks are easy for humans, they are challenging for state-of-the-art AI. How do we build intelligent systems that can generalize to novel situations and understand human instructions in domains such as ARC? We posit that the answer may be found by studying how humans communicate to each other in solving these tasks. We present LARC, the Language-annotated ARC: a collection of natural language descriptions by a group of human participants, unfamiliar both with ARC and with each other, who instruct each other on how to solve ARC tasks. LARC contains successful instructions for 88% of the ARC tasks. We analyze the collected instructions as ‘natural programs’, finding that most natural program concepts have analogies in typical computer programs. However, unlike how one precisely programs a computer, we find that humans both anticipate and exploit ambiguities to communicate effectively. We demonstrate that a state-of-the-art program synthesis technique, which leverages the additional language annotations, outperforms its language-free counterpart. 

   more » « less