An official website of the United States government
Like many other clinical and economic studies, each subject of our motivating transplant study is at risk of recurrent events of non-fatal tissue rejections as well as the terminating event of death due to total graft rejection. For such studies, our model and associated Bayesian analysis aim for some practical advantages over competing methods. Our semiparametric latent-class-based joint model has coherent interpretation of the covariate (including race and gender) effects on all functions and model quantities that are relevant for understanding the effects of covariates on future event trajectories. Our fully Bayesian method for estimation and prediction uses a complete specification of the prior process of the baseline functions. We also derive a practical and theoretically justifiable partial likelihood-based semiparametric Bayesian approach to deal with the analysis when there is a lack of prior information about baseline functions. Our model and method can accommodate fixed as well as time-varying covariates. Our Markov Chain Monte Carlo tools for both Bayesian methods are implementable via publicly available software. Our Bayesian analysis of transplant study and simulation study demonstrate practical advantages and improved performance of our approach.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on January 1, 2026
Causally Sound Priors for Binary Experiments
We introduce the BREASE framework for the Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials with a binary treatment and a binary outcome. Approaching the problem from a causal inference perspective, we propose parameterizing the likelihood in terms of the baseline risk, efficacy, and side effects of the treatment, along with a flexible, yet intuitive and tractable jointly independent beta prior distribution on these parameters, which we show to be a generalization of the Dirichlet prior for the joint distribution of potential outcomes. Our approach has a number of desirable characteristics when compared to current mainstream alternatives: (i) it naturally induces prior dependence between expected outcomes in the treatment and control groups; (ii) as the baseline risk, efficacy and side effects are quantities inherently familiar to clinicians, the hyperparameters of the prior are directly interpretable, thus facilitating the elicitation of prior knowledge and sensitivity analysis; and (iii) it admits analytical formulae for the marginal likelihood, Bayes factor, and other posterior quantities,as well as an exact posterior sampling algorithm and an accurate and fast data-augmented Gibbs sampler in cases where traditional MCMC fails. Empirical examples demonstrate the utility of our methods for estimation, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity analysis of treatment effects.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2417955
- PAR ID:
- 10614778
- Publisher / Repository:
- International Society for Bayesian Analysis
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Bayesian Analysis
- Volume:
- -1
- Issue:
- -1
- ISSN:
- 1936-0975
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We study critical systems that allocate scarce resources to satisfy basic needs, such as homeless services that provide housing. These systems often support communities disproportionately affected by systemic racial, gender, or other injustices, so it is crucial to design these systems with fairness considerations in mind. To address this problem, we propose a framework for evaluating fairness in contextual resource allocation systems that is inspired by fairness metrics in machine learning. This framework can be applied to evaluate the fairness properties of a historical policy, as well as to impose constraints in the design of new (counterfactual) allocation policies. Our work culminates with a set of incompatibility results that investigate the interplay between the different fairness metrics we propose. Notably, we demonstrate that: 1) fairness in allocation and fairness in outcomes are usually incompatible; 2) policies that prioritize based on a vulnerability score will usually result in unequal outcomes across groups, even if the score is perfectly calibrated; 3) policies using contextual information beyond what is needed to characterize baseline risk and treatment effects can be fairer in their outcomes than those using just baseline risk and treatment effects; and 4) policies using group status in addition to baseline risk and treatment effects are as fair as possible given all available information. Our framework can help guide the discussion among stakeholders in deciding which fairness metrics to impose when allocating scarce resources.more » « less
-
The formulation of Bayesian inverse problems involves choosing prior distributions; choices that seem equally reason-able may lead to significantly different conclusions. We develop a computational approach to understand the impact of the hyperparameters defining the prior on the posterior statistics of the quantities of interest. Our approach relies on global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of Bayesian inverse problems with respect to the prior hyperparameters. This, however, is a challenging problem-a naive double loop sampling approach would require running a prohibitive number of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling procedures. The present work takes a foundational step in making such a sensitivity analysis practical by combining efficient surrogate models and a tailored importance sampling approach. In particular, we can perform accurate GSA of posterior statistics of quantities of interest with respect to prior hyperparameters without the need to repeat MCMC runs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on a simple Bayesian linear inverse problem and a nonlinear inverse problem governed by an epidemiological model.more » « less
-
Due to the high dimensional integration over latent variables, computing marginal likelihood and posterior distributions for the parameters of a general hierarchical model is a difficult task. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms are commonly used to approximate the posterior distributions. These algorithms, though effective, are computationally intensive and can be slow for large, complex models. As an alternative to the MCMC approach, the Laplace approximation (LA) has been successfully used to obtain fast and accurate approximations to the posterior mean and other derived quantities related to the posterior distribution. In the last couple of decades, LA has also been used to approximate the marginal likelihood function and the posterior distribution. In this paper, we show that the bias in the Laplace approximation to the marginal likelihood has substantial practical consequences.more » « less
-
We consider hyper-differential sensitivity analysis (HDSA) of nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems governed by partialdifferential equations (PDEs) with infinite-dimensional parameters. In previous works, HDSA has been used to assessthe sensitivity of the solution of deterministic inverse problems to additional model uncertainties and also different types of measurement data. In the present work, we extend HDSA to the class of Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs. The focus is on assessing the sensitivity of certain key quantities derived from the posterior distribution. Specifically, we focus on analyzing the sensitivity of the MAP point and the Bayes risk and make full use of the information embedded in the Bayesian inverse problem. After establishing our mathematical framework for HDSA of Bayesian inverse problems, we present a detailed computational approach for computing the proposed HDSA indices. We examine the effectiveness of the proposed approach on an inverse problem governed by a PDE modeling heat conduction.more » « less
