An official website of the United States government
Additive manufacturing promises to revolutionize manufacturing industries. However, 3D printing of novel build materials is currently limited by constraints inherent to printer designs. In this work, a bench-top powder melt extrusion (PME) 3D printer head was designed and fabricated to print parts directly from powder-based materials rather than filament. The final design of the PME printer head evolved from the Rich Rap Universal Pellet Extruder (RRUPE) design and was realized through an iterative approach. The PME printer was made possible by modifications to the funnel shape, pressure applied to the extrudate by the auger, and hot end structure. Through comparison of parts printed with the PME printer with those from a commercially available fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printer using common thermoplastics poly(lactide) (PLA), high impact poly(styrene) (HIPS), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) powders (< 1 mm in diameter), evaluation of the printer performance was performed. For each build material, the PME printed objects show comparable viscoelastic properties by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) to those of the FFF objects. However, due to a significant difference in printer resolution between PME (X–Y resolution of 0.8 mm and a Z-layer height calibrated to 0.1 mm) and FFF (X–Y resolution of 0.4 mm and a Z-layer height of 0.18 mm), as well as, an inherently more inconsistent feed of build material for PME than FFF, the resulting print quality, determined by a dimensional analysis and surface roughness comparisons, of the PME printed objects was lower than that of the FFF printed parts based on the print layer uniformity and structure. Further, due to the poorer print resolution and inherent inconsistent build material feed of the PME, the bulk tensile strength and Young’s moduli of the objects printed by PME were lower and more inconsistent (49.2 ± 10.7 MPa and 1620 ± 375 MPa, respectively) than those of FFF printed objects (57.7 ± 2.31 MPa and 2160 ± 179 MPa, respectively). Nevertheless, PME print methods promise an opportunity to provide a platform on which it is possible to rapidly prototype a myriad of thermoplastic materials for 3D printing.
more »
« less
Brief Paper: Geometric Determinants of Material Jetting-Enabled Bi-Material Interface Integrity Using Polyjet 3D Printing
Abstract Among the wide range of additive manufacturing — or “three-dimensional (3D) printing” — technologies, “material jetting” approaches are distinctively suited for multi-material fabrication. Because material jetting strategies, such as “PolyJet 3D printing”, harness inkjets that allow for multiple photopolymer droplets (and sacrificial support materials) to be dispensed in parallel to build 3D objects, distinct materials with unique properties can be readily unified in a single print akin to combining multiple-colored inks using a conventional 2D color printer. Although researchers have leveraged this multi-material capability to achieve, for example, 3D functionally graded and bi-material composite systems, there are cases in which the interface between distinct materials can become a key region of mechanical failure if not designed properly. To elucidate potential design factors that contribute to such failure modes, here we investigate the relationship between the interface design and tensile mechanical failure dynamics for PolyJet-printed bi-material coupons. Experimental results for a select set of bi-material sample designs that were 3D printed using a Stratasys Objet500 Connex3 PolyJet 3D printer and subjected to uniaxial tensile testing using a Tinius Olsen H25K-T benchtop universal testing machine under uniaxial strain revealed that increasing the surface contact area between two distinct materials via changes in geometric design does not necessarily increase the interface strength based on the length scales and loading conditions investigated in the current study and that further studies of the role of multi-material geometric designs in interface integrity are warranted to understand potential mechanisms underlying these results. Given the increasing interest in material jetting — and PolyJet 3D printing in particular — as a pathway to multi-material manufacturing in fields including robotics and fluidic circuitry, this study suggests that multi-material interface geometry should be considered appropriately for future applications.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1943356
- PAR ID:
- 10620996
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 978-0-7918-8810-0
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract A rapid and facile approach to predictably control integration between two materials with divergent properties is introduced. Programmed integration between photopolymerizable soft and stiff hydrogels is investigated due to their promise in applications such as tissue engineering where heterogeneous properties are often desired. The spatial control afforded by grayscale 3D printing is leveraged to define regions at the interface that permit diffusive transport of a second material in‐filled into the 3D printed part. The printing parameters (i.e., effective exposure dose) for the resin are correlated directly to mesh size to achieve controlled diffusion. Applying this information to grayscale exposures leads to a range of distances over which integration is achieved with high fidelity. A prescribed finite distance of integration between soft and stiff hydrogels leads to a 33% increase in strain to failure under tensile testing and eliminates failure at the interface. The feasibility of this approach is demonstrated in a layer‐by‐layer 3D printed part fabricated by stereolithography, which is subsequently infilled with a soft hydrogel containing osteoblastic cells. In summary, this approach holds promise for applications where integration of multiple materials and living cells is needed by allowing precise control over integration and reducing mechanical failure at contrasting material interfaces.more » « less
-
Abstract Natural organisms have evolved a series of versatile functional biomaterials and structures to cope with survival crises in their living environment, exhibiting outstanding properties such as superhydrophobicity, anisotropy, and mechanical reinforcement, which have provided abundant inspiration for the design and fabrication of next‐generation multi‐functional devices. However, the lack of available materials and limitations of traditional manufacturing methods for complex multiscale structures have hindered the progress in bio‐inspired manufacturing of functional structures. As a revolutionary emerging manufacturing technology, additive manufacturing (i.e., 3D printing) offers high design flexibility and manufacturing freedom, providing the potential for the fabrication of intricate, multiscale, hierarchical, and multi‐material structures. Herein, a comprehensive review of current 3D printing of surface/interface structures, covering the applied materials, designs, and functional applications is provided. Several bio‐inspired surface structures that have been created using 3D printing technology are highlighted and categorized based on their specific properties and applications, some properties can be applied to multiple applications. The optimized designs of these 3D‐printed bio‐inspired surfaces offer a promising prospect of low‐cost, high efficiency, and excellent performance. Finally, challenges and opportunities in field of fabricating functional surface/interface with more versatile functional material, refined structural design, and better cost‐effective are discussed.more » « less
-
Additive manufacturing has provided the ability to manufacture complex structures using a wide variety of materials and geometries. Structures such as triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) lattices have been incorporated into products across many fields due to their unique combinations of mechanical, geometric, and physical properties. Yet, the near limitless possibility of combining geometry and material into these lattices leaves much to be discovered. This article provides a dataset of experimentally gathered tensile stress-strain curves and measured porosity values for 389 unique gyroid lattice structures manufactured using vat photopolymerization 3D printing. The lattice samples were printed from one of twenty different photopolymer materials available from either Formlabs, LOCTITE AM, or ETEC that range from strong and brittle to elastic and ductile and were printed on commercially available 3D printers, specifically the Formlabs Form2, Prusa SL1, and ETEC Envision One cDLM Mechanical. The stress-strain curves were recorded with an MTS Criterion C43.504 mechanical testing apparatus and following ASTM standards, and the void fraction or “porosity” of each lattice was measured using a calibrated scale. This data serves as a valuable resource for use in the development of novel printing materials and lattice geometries and provides insight into the influence of photopolymer material properties on the printability, geometric accuracy, and mechanical performance of 3D printed lattice structures. The data described in this article was used to train a machine learning model capable of predicting mechanical properties of 3D printed gyroid lattices based on the base mechanical properties of the printing material and porosity of the lattice in the research article [1].more » « less
-
Abstract Additive manufacturing, an innovative process that assembles materials layer by layer from 3D model data, is recognized as a transformative technology across diverse industries. Researchers have extensively investigated the impact of various printing parameters of 3D printing machines, such as printing speed, nozzle temperature, and infill, on the mechanical properties of printed objects. Specifically, this study focuses on applying Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in G code modification in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printing. FDM involves extruding a thermoplastic filament in layers over a build plate to create a three-dimensional object. In the realm of load-bearing structures, the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) process is initiated on the target object, employing the primary load to identify areas with high-stress concentrations. Subsequently, optimization techniques are used to strategically assign printing parameter combinations to improve mechanical properties in potentially vulnerable regions. The ultimate objective is to tailor the G code, a set of instructions for the printer, to strengthen particular areas and improve the printed object’s overall structural integrity. To evaluate the suggested methodology’s efficacy, the study conducts a comprehensive analysis of printed objects, both with and without the optimized G code. Simultaneously, mechanical testing, such as tensile testing, demonstrates quantitative data on structural performance. This comprehensive analysis aims to identify the impact of G code alteration on the finished product. Preliminary experimental results using simple tensile specimens indicate notable improvements in structural performance. Importantly, these improvements are achieved without any discernible mass increase, optimizing material usage and reducing the cost of additive manufacturing. The modified G code targets to strengthen critical areas using updated printing parameters without a net increase in the overall material consumption of the object. This finding holds significant implications for industries reliant on additive manufacturing for load-bearing components, offering a promising avenue for improved efficiency and durability. Integrating advanced techniques, such as G code modification and finite element analysis (FEA), as the additive manufacturing landscape evolves presents a pathway toward optimizing mechanical properties. By contributing valuable insights and laying the groundwork for further exploration and refinement of these methodologies, this study paves the way for enhanced structural performance in various additive manufacturing applications. Ultimately, it encourages innovation and progress in the field, propelling the industry toward new heights of efficiency and reliability.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2024-122414
