skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Transform Analysis of Preemption Overhead in the M/G/1
Preemptive scheduling policies, which allow pausing jobs mid-service, are ubiquitous because they allow important jobs to receive service ahead of unimportant jobs that would otherwise delay their completion. The canonical example is Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT), which preemptively serves the job with least remaining work at every moment in time [9]. There is a robust literature analyzing response time (elapsed time between a job's arrival and completion) in the M/G/1 queue under many preemptive policies [6, 10, 11], shedding light on questions such as how preemption affects the mean and tail of response time, and whether preemption is unfair towards low-priority jobs.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2307008
PAR ID:
10623912
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
ACM
Date Published:
Journal Name:
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
Volume:
52
Issue:
2
ISSN:
0163-5999
Page Range / eLocation ID:
18 to 20
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS))
    The Age-of-Information (AoI) is a new performance metric recently proposed for measuring the freshness of information in information-update systems. In this work, we conduct a systematic and comparative study to investigate the impact of scheduling policies on the AoI performance in single-server queues and provide useful guidelines for the design of AoI-efficient scheduling policies. Specifically, we first perform extensive simulations to demonstrate that the update-size information can be leveraged for achieving a substantially improved AoI compared to non-size-based (or arrival-time-based) policies. Then, by utilizing both the update-size and arrival-time information, we propose three AoI-based policies. Observing improved AoI performance of policies that allow service preemption and that prioritize informative updates, we further propose preemptive, informative, AoI-based scheduling policies. Our simulation results show that such policies empirically achieve the best AoI performance among all the considered policies. Interestingly, we also prove sample-path equivalence between some size-based policies and AoI-based policies. This provides an intuitive explanation for why some size-based policies, such as Shortest-Remaining-Processing-Time (SRPT), achieve a very good AoI performance. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Management Science)
    The shortest-remaining-processing-time (SRPT) scheduling policy has been extensively studied, for more than 50 years, in single-server queues with infinitely patient jobs. Yet, much less is known about its performance in multiserver queues. In this paper, we present the first theoretical analysis of SRPT in multiserver queues with abandonment. In particular, we consider the M/GI/s+GI queue and demonstrate that, in the many-sever overloaded regime, performance in the SRPT queue is equivalent, asymptotically in steady state, to a preemptive two-class priority queue where customers with short service times (below a threshold) are served without wait, and customers with long service times (above a threshold) eventually abandon without service. We prove that the SRPT discipline maximizes, asymptotically, the system throughput, among all scheduling disciplines. We also compare the performance of the SRPT policy to blind policies and study the effects of the patience-time and service-time distributions. This paper was accepted by Baris Ata, stochastic models & simulation. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Annals of Operations Research)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract We consider a natural generalization of classical scheduling problems to a setting in which using a time unit for processing a job causes some time-dependent cost, the time-of-use tariff, which must be paid in addition to the standard scheduling cost. We focus on preemptive single-machine scheduling and two classical scheduling cost functions, the sum of (weighted) completion times and the maximum completion time, that is, the makespan. While these problems are easy to solve in the classical scheduling setting, they are considerably more complex when time-of-use tariffs must be considered. We contribute optimal polynomial-time algorithms and best possible approximation algorithms. For the problem of minimizing the total (weighted) completion time on a single machine, we present a polynomial-time algorithm that computes for any given sequence of jobs an optimal schedule, i.e., the optimal set of time slots to be used for preemptively scheduling jobs according to the given sequence. This result is based on dynamic programming using a subtle analysis of the structure of optimal solutions and a potential function argument. With this algorithm, we solve the unweighted problem optimally in polynomial time. For the more general problem, in which jobs may have individual weights, we develop a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) based on a dual scheduling approach introduced for scheduling on a machine of varying speed. As the weighted problem is strongly NP-hard, our PTAS is the best possible approximation we can hope for. For preemptive scheduling to minimize the makespan, we show that there is a comparably simple optimal algorithm with polynomial running time. This is true even in a certain generalized model with unrelated machines. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications)
    The fixed preemption point (FPP) model has been studied as an alternative to fully preemptive and non-preemptive models, as restricting preemptions to specific, predictable locations within a task’s execution can simplify overhead analysis without disallowing preemptions entirely. Prior work has produced response-time analyses for global Earliest Deadline First (G-EDF) scheduling under the FPP model. However, scheduling decisions based solely on task deadlines may be too coarsegrained and may not lead to the lowest response times. In this paper, we propose global FPP EDF-like (G-FPP-EL) scheduling, which assigns a priority point in time for each non-preemptive region of a task. We adapt compliant-vector analysis (CVA) to our model and present general response-time bounds for G-FPPEL schedulers. We then demonstrate that it is possible to design G-FPP-EL schedulers acheiving response-time bounds optimal under CVA and argue that such schedulers should replace global FPP EDF. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review)
    Due to a growing interest in deep learning applications [5], compute-intensive and long-running (hours to days) training jobs have become a significant component of datacenter workloads. A large fraction of these jobs is often exploratory, with the goal of determining the best model structure (e.g., the number of layers and channels in a convolutional neural network), hyperparameters (e.g., the learning rate), and data augmentation strategies for the target application. Notably, training jobs are often terminated early if their learning metrics (e.g., training and validation accuracy) are not converging, with only a few completing successfully. For this motivating application, we consider the problem of scheduling a set of jobs that can be terminated at predetermined checkpoints with known probabilities estimated from historical data. We prove that, in order to minimize the time to complete the first K successful jobs on a single server, optimal scheduling does not require preemption (even when preemption overhead is negligible) and provide an optimal policy; advantages of this policy are quantified through simulation. Related Work. While job scheduling has been investigated extensively in many scenarios (see [6] and [2] for a survey of recent result), most policies require that the cost of waiting times of each job be known at scheduling time; in contrast, in our setting the scheduler does not know which job will be the K-th successful job, and sojourn times of subsequent jobs do not contribute to the target metric. For example, [4, 3] minimize makespan (i.e., the time to complete all jobs) for known execution times and waiting time costs; similarly, Gittins index [1] and SR rank [7] minimize expected sojourn time of all jobs, i.e., both successfully completed jobs and jobs terminated early. Unfortunately, scheduling policies not distinguishing between these two types of jobs may favor jobs where the next stage is short and leads to early termination with high probability, which is an undesirable outcome in our applications of interest. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email