An official website of the United States government
This paper considers policy search in continuous state-action reinforcement learning problems. Typically, one computes search directions using a classic expression for the policy gradient called the Policy Gradient Theorem, which decomposes the gradient of the value function into two factors: the score function and the Q-function. This paper presents four results: (i) an alternative policy gradient theorem using weak (measure-valued) derivatives instead of score-function is established; (ii) the stochastic gradient estimates thus derived are shown to be unbiased and to yield algorithms that converge almost surely to stationary points of the non-convex value function of the reinforcement learning problem; (iii) the sample complexity of the algorithm is derived and is shown to be O(1/ k); (iv) finally, the expected variance of the gradient estimates obtained using weak derivatives is shown to be lower than those obtained using the popular score-function approach. Experiments on OpenAI gym pendulum environment illustrate the superior performance of the proposed algorithm.
more »
« less
Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation Through Behavior Policy Search
We consider the task of evaluating a policy for a Markov decision process (MDP). The standard unbiased technique for evaluating a policy is to deploy the policy and observe its performance. We show that the data collected from deploying a different policy, commonly called the behavior policy, can be used to produce unbiased estimates with lower mean squared error than this standard technique. We derive an analytic expression for a minimal variance behavior policy -- a behavior policy that minimizes the mean squared error of the resulting estimates. Because this expression depends on terms that are unknown in practice, we propose a novel policy evaluation sub-problem, behavior policy search: searching for a behavior policy that reduces mean squared error. We present two behavior policy search algorithms and empirically demonstrate their effectiveness in lowering the mean squared error of policy performance estimates.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2410981
- PAR ID:
- 10631573
- Editor(s):
- Ravikumar, Pradeep
- Publisher / Repository:
- JMLR
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of machine learning research
- ISSN:
- 1533-7928
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Motivated by the many real-world applications of reinforcement learning (RL) that require safe-policy iterations, we consider the problem of off-policy evaluation (OPE) — the problem of evaluating a new policy using the historical data ob- tained by different behavior policies — under the model of nonstationary episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDP) with a long horizon and a large action space. Existing importance sampling (IS) methods often suffer from large variance that depends exponentially on the RL horizon H. To solve this problem, we consider a marginalized importance sampling (MIS) estimator that recursively estimates the state marginal distribution for the target policy at every step. MIS achieves a mean-squared error of [ ] where μ and π are the logging and target policies, dμt (st) and dπt (st) are the marginal distribution of the state at tth step, H is the horizon, n is the sample size and V π is the value function of the MDP under π. The result matches the t+1 Cramer-Rao lower bound in Jiang and Li [2016] up to a multiplicative factor of H. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first OPE estimation error bound with a polynomial dependence on H . Besides theory, we show empirical superiority of our method in time-varying, partially observable, and long-horizon RL environments.more » « less
-
We consider a personalized pricing problem in which we have data consisting of feature information, historical pricing decisions, and binary realized demand. The goal is to perform off-policy evaluation for a new personalized pricing policy that maps features to prices. Methods based on inverse propensity weighting (including doubly robust methods) for off-policy evaluation may perform poorly when the logging policy has little exploration or is deterministic, which is common in pricing applications. Building on the balanced policy evaluation framework of Kallus (2018), we propose a new approach tailored to pricing applications. The key idea is to compute an estimate that minimizes the worst-case mean squared error or maximizes a worst-case lower bound on policy performance, where in both cases the worst-case is taken with respect to a set of possible revenue functions. We establish theoretical convergence guarantees and empirically demonstrate the advantage of our approach using a real-world pricing dataset.more » « less
-
In this paper, we study safe data collection for the purpose of policy evaluation in tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs). In policy evaluation, we are given a target policy and asked to estimate the expected cumulative reward it will obtain. Policy evaluation requires data and we are interested in the question of what behavior policy should collect the data for the most accurate evaluation of the target policy. While prior work has considered behavior policy selection, in this paper, we additionally consider a safety constraint on the behavior policy. Namely, we assume there exists a known default policy that incurs a particular expected cost when run and we enforce that the cumulative cost of all behavior policies ran is better than a constant factor of the cost that would be incurred had we always run the default policy. We first show that there exists a class of intractable MDPs where no safe oracle algorithm with knowledge about problem parameters can efficiently collect data and satisfy the safety constraints. We then define the tractability condition for an MDP such that a safe oracle algorithm can efficiently collect data and using that we prove the first lower bound for this setting. We then introduce an algorithm SaVeR for this problem that approximates the safe oracle algorithm and bound the finite-sample mean squared error of the algorithm while ensuring it satisfies the safety constraint. Finally, we show in simulations that SaVeR produces low MSE policy evaluation while satisfying the safety constraint.more » « less
-
In this paper, we study the problem of optimal data collection for policy evaluation in linear bandits. In policy evaluation, we are given a \textit{target} policy and asked to estimate the expected reward it will obtain when executed in a multi-armed bandit environment. Our work is the first work that focuses on such an optimal data collection strategy for policy evaluation involving heteroscedastic reward noise in the linear bandit setting. We first formulate an optimal design for weighted least squares estimates in the heteroscedastic linear bandit setting with the knowledge of noise variances. This design minimizes the mean squared error (MSE) of the estimated value of the target policy and is termed the oracle design. Since the noise variance is typically unknown, we then introduce a novel algorithm, SPEED (\textbf{S}tructured \textbf{P}olicy \textbf{E}valuation \textbf{E}xperimental \textbf{D}esign), that tracks the oracle design and derive its regret with respect to the oracle design. We show that regret scales as 𝑂˜(𝑑3𝑛−3/2) and prove a matching lower bound of Ω(𝑑2𝑛−3/2) . Finally, we evaluate SPEED on a set of policy evaluation tasks and demonstrate that it achieves MSE comparable to an optimal oracle and much lower than simply running the target policy.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- The DOI is not currently available.
