More Like this

1. Efficient Knowledge Graph Accuracy Evaluation

   https://doi.org/10.14778/3342263.3342642  

   Gao, Junyang; Li, Xian; Xu, Yifan Ethan; Sisman, Bunyamin; Dong, Xin Luna; Yang, Jun (July 2019, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment)
2. High Accuracy Underwater Photogrammetric Surveying.

   Capra, A.; Castagnetti, C.; Dubbini, M.; Gruen, A.; Guo, T.; Mancini, F. T.; Neyer, F.; Rossi, P.; Troyer, M. (October 2017, 3rd IMEKO International Conference on Metrology for Archeology and Cultural Heritage)

   The evolution of underwater photogrammetry allows to realize 3D models of submerged object and structures throughout the use of rapid and efficient procedures either in terms of data acquisition and data processing. These procedures are based on solutions that are applied using natural control points, signalized markers and tie points; the most common algorithms are based on Structure from Motion (SfM) approach. The limit of these applications is sometimes due to the final accuracy, especially when the goal is a centimeter level of accuracy. This accuracy should be necessary when dealing with a survey devoted to deformation control purposes. An example is the underwater photogrammetry for the determination of coral growth; it is effectively a movement or a deformation detection issue where the geometric change is almost at centimeter or few centimeters accuracy level. When dealing with deformation control applications, a geodetic network is essential to realize a stable and unambiguous reference frame through the accurate and permanent installation of Ground Control Points (GCPs). Such a network, indeed, permits a robust reference frame for the georeferencing of images blocks in the different époques of data acquisition. Therefore, the comparison among subsequent photogrammetric restitutions is based on homogeneous 3D models that have been oriented in the same absolute reference system. The photogrammetric survey is based on a methodological approach especially adapted to underwater biometry (like coral growth determination) and to underwater archaeology. The approach is suitable both for modeling objects of relatively reduced dimensions and for structures with a length of ten meters or more, such as coral barriers, wrecks and long walls. The paper describes underwater photogrammetric surveys on sites at different extensions, the geodetic GCPs reference network installation and measurements (distance and elevation difference observations) as well as preliminary results of the network adjustment. A brief description of image acquisition at a different scales and the resulting 3D model of first campaign are also shown. 

   more » « less
3. gem5 GPU Accuracy Profiler (GAP)

   Charles Jamieson, Anushka Chandrashekar (June 2022, 4th gem5 Users Workshop)

   In recent years, we have been enhancing and updating gem5's GPU support. First, we have enhanced gem5’s GPU support for ML workloads such that gem5 can now run. Moreover, as part of this support, we created, validated, and released a Docker image that contains the proper software and libraries needed to run GCN3 and Vega GPU models in gem5. With this container, users can run the gem5 GPU model, as well as build the ROCm applications that they want to run in the GPU model, out of the box without needing to properly install the appropriate ROCm software and libraries. Additionally, we have updated gem5 to make it easier to reproduce results, including releasing support for a number of GPU workloads in gem5-resources and enabling continuous integration testing on future GPU commits. However, we currently do not have a way to model validated gem5 configurations for the most recent AMD GPUs. Current support focuses on Carrizo- and Vega-class GPUs. Unfortunately, these models do not always provide high accuracy relative to real GPU runs. This leads to a mismatch between how each instruction is supposedly being executed according to the ISA and how a given GPU model executes a given instruction. These discrepancies are of interest to those developing the gem5 GPU models as they can lead to less accurate simulations. Accordingly, to help bridge this divide, we have created a new tool, GAP (gem5 GPU Accuracy Profiler), to identify discrepancies between real GPU and simulated gem5 GPU behavior. GAP identifies and verifies how accurate these configurations relative to real GPUs by comparing the simulator’s performance counters to those from real GPUs. 

   more » « less
4. Limited accuracy of linearized gravity

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023527  

   Giblin, John T.; Mertens, James B.; Starkman, Glenn D.; Tian, Chi (January 2019, Physical Review D)
5. Agreement Implies Accuracy for Substitutable Signals

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3580507.3597679  

   Frongillo, Rafael; Neyman, Eric; Waggoner, Bo (July 2023, ACM)