In the past two decades, there has been a trend in materials for mathematics courses for prospective secondary teachers: more opportunities for teachers to “apply mathematics to teaching”. That is, materials increasingly highlight how mathematical knowledge learned in the course can be useful in secondary teaching, and provide opportunities for teachers to harness this knowledge in simulations of teaching. There is little known about the effects of this curricular reform on teachers’ competence. In this report, we use data from the Mathematics of Doing, Understanding, Learning, and Educating for Secondary Schools MODULE(S2) project to examine the potential impact of using such curricular materials. The data include over 300 prospective secondary teachers’ responses to 3 sets of Likert pre-/post-term surveys addressing: mathematical knowledge for teaching; expectancy for enacting selected core teaching practices; and valuing of enacting these practices. We found mean increases across the survey results. We conclude with directions for future research on the impact of this curricular reform.
more »
« less
Learning to teach teachers: Community college faculty explore fraction tasks for teaching
Teaching mathematics for future elementary teachers is fundamentally different from other forms of mathematics and thus requires different knowledge. As community colleges become increasingly involved in the process of training future teachers, it is essential to explore how instructors at these institutions develop as mathematics teacher educators. This paper reports on a preliminary exploration of how community college faculty grappled with teaching-oriented mathematical tasks involving fractions. Choices of mathematical representation, selection of answer before and after discussion, and overall themes are discussed, with a focus on development of mathematical content knowledge for teaching.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2215614
- PAR ID:
- 10635612
- Editor(s):
- Cook, S; Katz, B; Moore-Russo, D
- Publisher / Repository:
- Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Revista Investigación y Formación Pedagógica
- ISSN:
- 2474-9346
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Professional Development, Math Teacher Educators, Preservice Elementary Teachers
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In the past two decades, there has been a trend in materials for mathematics courses for prospective secondary teachers: more opportunities for teachers to “apply mathematics to teaching”. That is, materials increasingly highlight how mathematical knowledge learned in the course can be useful in secondary teaching, and provide opportunities for teachers to harness this knowledge in simulations of teaching. There is little known about the effects of this curricular reform on teachers’ competence. In this report, we use data from the Mathematics of Doing, Understanding, Learning, and Educating for Secondary Schools MODULE(S2) project to examine the potential impact of using such curricular materials. The data include over 300 prospective secondary teachers’ responses to 3 sets of Likert pre-/post-term surveys addressing: mathematical knowledge for teaching; expectancy for enacting selected core teaching practices; and valuing of enacting these practices. We found mean increases across the survey results. We conclude with directions for future research on the impact of this curricular reform.more » « less
-
Hodgen, J.; Geraniou, E.; Bolondi, G.; & Ferretti, F. (Ed.)Stakeholders agree that the mathematical education of teachers needs to focus on mathematical knowledge for teaching, but the practice-based nature of this knowledge poses challenges for mathematics teacher educators — for understanding it, developing tasks that maintain its integrity in practice, and teaching it to teachers in ways that meaningfully support their learning to teach. We know little, however, about how mathematics teacher educators conceptualize the teaching that knowledge is to support. Our analysis reveals that thinking develops from a view of teaching as straightforward, where aspects can be treated in isolation, to a view of it as requiring focused attention while maintaining mutual regard for the whole. This difference has implications for how mathematics teacher educators understand specialized mathematical knowledge and for how to support their understanding and teaching of it.more » « less
-
Recent scholarship has explored mathematical demands faced by mathematics teacher educators and ways to support their development, but little attention has been given to the basic question of how mathematics teacher educators think about content knowledge for teaching. Knowing what they think could inform efforts to support them. Our analysis reveals that some think about mathematical knowledge for teaching as an independent, abstracted resource to be taught and learned in relative isolation from teaching, while others think about it as dynamic, situated work. We argue that this key difference matters for how they work with teachers. Further, our analysis reveals that their thinking about both teaching and justice interacts with their thinking about mathematical knowledge for teaching and that their thinking in these other two domains can be a resource for supporting their mathematical development.more » « less
-
In this paper, we examine the relationships between teachers’ subject matter preparation and experience in teaching and their performance on an instrument measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching Algebra 1. We administered the same instrument to two different samples of teachers−high school practicing teachers and community college faculty − who teach the same algebra content in different levels of institutions, and we compared the performance of the two different samples and the relationships between the measured knowledge and their educational and teaching background across the samples. The comparison suggested that the community college faculty possess a higher level of mathematical knowledge for teaching Algebra 1 than high school teachers. The subsequent analyses using the Multiple Indicator Multiple Causes (MIMIC) models based on our hypothesis on the factors contributing to the differences in the knowledge between the two teacher samples suggest that experience teaching advanced algebra courses has positive effects on the mathematical knowledge for teaching Algebra 1 in both groups. Highlighting the positive effect of algebra-based teaching experience on test performance, we discuss the implications of the impact of subject specific experience in teaching on teachers’ mathematical content knowledge for teaching.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

