An official website of the United States government
Abstract Females and males can exhibit striking differences in body size, relative trait size, physiology, and behavior. As a consequence, the sexes can have very different rates of whole-body energy use, or converge on similar rates through different physiological mechanisms. Yet many studies that measure the relationship between metabolic rate and body size only pay attention to a single sex (more often males), or do not distinguish between sexes. We present four reasons why explicit attention to energy-use between the sexes can yield insight into the physiological mechanisms that shape broader patterns of metabolic scaling in nature. First, the sexes often differ considerably in their relative investment in reproduction, which shapes much of life-history and rates of energy use. Second, males and females share a majority of their genome but may experience different selective pressures. Sex-specific energy profiles can reveal how the energetic needs of individuals are met despite the challenge of within-species genetic constraints. Third, sexual selection often pushes growth and behavior to physiological extremes. Exaggerated sexually selected traits are often most prominent in one sex, can comprise up to 50% of body mass, and thus provide opportunities to uncover energetic constraints of trait growth and maintenance. Finally, sex-differences in behavior such as mating-displays, long-distance dispersal, and courtship can lead to drastically different energy allocation among the sexes; the physiology to support this behavior can shape patterns of metabolic scaling. The mechanisms underlying metabolic scaling in females, males, and hermaphroditic animals can provide opportunities to develop testable predictions that enhance our understanding of energetic scaling patterns in nature.
more »
« less
Sexual Selection, Energetics and Ecological Innovation: How Sexual Selection Diversifies the Landscape of Behavior, Morphology and Physiology
Synopsis Sexual selection drives the evolution of a broad diversity of traits, such as the enlarged claws of fiddler crabs, the high-energy behavioral displays of hummingbirds, the bright red plumage of house finches, the elaborated antennae of moths, the wing “snapping” displays of manakins and the calculated calls of túngara frogs. A majority of work in sexual selection has aimed to measure the magnitude of these traits. Yet, we know surprisingly little about the physiology shaping such a diversity of sexually selected behavior and supportive morphology. The energetic properties underlying sexual signals are ultimately fueled by metabolic machinery at multiple scales, from mitochondrial properties and enzymatic activity to hormonal regulation and the modification of muscular and neural tissues. However, different organisms have different physiological constraints and face various ecological selection pressures; thus, selection operates and interacts at multiple scales to shape sexually selected traits and behavior. In this perspective piece, we describe illustrative case studies in different organisms to emphasize that understanding the physiological and energetic mechanisms that shape sexual traits may be critical to understanding their evolution and ramifications with ecological selection. We discuss (1) the way sexual selection shapes multiple integrated components of physiology, behavior, and morphology, (2) the way that sexually selected carotenoid pigments may reflect some aspects of cellular processes, (3) the relationship between sexually selected modalities and energetics, (4) the hormone ecdysone and its role in shaping sex-specific phenotypes in insects, (5) the way varied interaction patterns and social contexts select for signaling strategies that are responsive to social scenes, and (6) the role that sexual selection may have in the exploitation of novel thermal niches. Our major objective is to describe how sexually selected behavior, physiology, and ecology are shaped in diverse organisms so that we may develop a deeper and more integrated understanding of sexual trait evolution and its ecological consequences.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10636957
- Publisher / Repository:
- Oxford University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Integrative And Comparative Biology
- Volume:
- 65
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 1540-7063
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 461-471
- Size(s):
- p. 461-471
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Patricelli, Gail L. (Ed.)Predation plays a role in preventing the evolution of ever more complicated sexual displays, because such displays often increase an individual’s predation risk. Sexual selection theory, however, omits a key feature of predation in modeling costs to sexually selected traits: Predation is density dependent. As a result of this density dependence, predator–prey dynamics should feed back into the evolution of sexual displays, which, in turn, feeds back into predator–prey dynamics. Here, we develop both population and quantitative genetic models of sexual selection that explicitly link the evolution of sexual displays with predator–prey dynamics. Our primary result is that predation can drive eco-evolutionary cycles in sexually selected traits. We also show that mechanistically modeling the cost to sexual displays as predation leads to novel outcomes such as the maintenance of polymorphism in sexual displays and alters ecological dynamics by muting prey cycles. These results suggest predation as a potential mechanism to maintain variation in sexual displays and underscore that short-term studies of sexual display evolution may not accurately predict long-run dynamics. Further, they demonstrate that a common verbal model (that predation limits sexual displays) with widespread empirical support can result in unappreciated, complex dynamics due to the density-dependent nature of predation.more » « less
-
Despite the well-known effects of sexual selection on phenotypes, links between this evolutionary process and reproductive isolation, genomic divergence, and speciation have been difficult to establish. We unravel the genetic basis of sexually selected plumage traits to investigate their effects on reproductive isolation in barn swallows. The genetic architecture of sexual traits is characterized by 12 loci on two autosomes and the Z chromosome. Sexual trait loci exhibit signatures of divergent selection in geographic isolation and barriers to gene flow in secondary contact. Linkage disequilibrium between these genes has been maintained by selection in hybrid zones beyond what would be expected under admixture alone. Our findings reveal that selection on coupled sexual trait loci promotes reproductive isolation, providing key empirical evidence for the role of sexual selection in speciation.more » « less
-
Abstract In live-bearing animal lineages, the evolution of the placenta is predicted to create an arena for genomic conflict during pregnancy, drive patterns of male sexual selection, and increase the rate of speciation. Here we test these predictions of the viviparity driven conflict hypothesis (VDCH) in live-bearing poecilid fishes, a group showing multiple independent origins of placentation and extreme variation in male sexually selected traits. As predicted, male sexually selected traits are only gained in lineages that lack placentas; while there is little or no influence of male traits on the evolution of placentas. Both results are consistent with the mode of female provisioning governing the evolution of male attributes. Moreover, it is the presence of male sexually selected traits (pre-copulatory), rather than placentation (post-copulatory), that are associated with higher rates of speciation. These results highlight a causal interaction between female reproductive mode, male sexual selection and the rate of speciation, suggesting a role for conflict in shaping diverse aspects of organismal biology.more » « less
-
Abstract Many organisms actively manipulate the environment in ways that feed back on their own development, a process referred to as developmental niche construction. Yet, the role that constructed biotic and abiotic environments play in shaping phenotypic variation and its evolution is insufficiently understood. Here, we assess whether environmental modifications made by developing dung beetles impact the environment‐sensitive expression of secondary sexual traits. Gazelle dung beetles both physically modify their ontogenetic environment and structure their biotic interactions through the vertical inheritance of microbial symbionts. By experimentally eliminating (i) physical environmental modifications and (ii) the vertical inheritance of microbes, we assess the degree to which (sym)biotic and physical environmental modifications shape the exaggeration of several traits varying in their degree and direction of sexual dimorphism. We expected the experimental reduction of a larva's ability to shape its environment to affect trait size and scaling, especially for traits that are sexually dimorphic and environmentally plastic. We find that compromised developmental niche construction indeed shapes sexual dimorphism in overall body size and the absolute sizes of male‐limited exaggerated head horns, the strongly sexually dimorphic fore tibia length and width, as well as the weakly dimorphic elytron length and width. This suggests that environmental modifications affect sex‐specific phenotypic variation in functional traits. However, most of these effects can be attributed to nutrition‐dependent plasticity in size and non‐isometric trait scaling rather than body‐size‐independent effects on the developmental regulation of trait size. Our findings suggest that the reciprocal relationship between developing organisms, their symbionts, and their environment can have considerable impacts on sexual dimorphism and functional morphology.more » « less
