As computation becomes increasingly central to mathematics education, instructors must balance competing forces when choosing which computational tools to use in their courses. This is compounded in probability and statistics where computation is widely used. Grounded in a social constructivist perspective, we believe that tools mediate our activities and that different tools play different mediational roles. As such, this study explores how different computational tools mediate undergraduate students' mathematical activity of argumentation. Using Toulmin’s argument model, this research investigates how two classes in probability and statistics using different computational tools, R or Minitab, performed on a mirrored assignment. Through analysis of students’ assignments, a difference emerged across the classes use of visuals. Our findings suggest Minitab promoted more deliberate consideration and use of visuals than R, leading to a difference in arguments produced by the students.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on March 1, 2026
Students’ perceptions of their professors’ integration of computation in their probability and statistics courses.
Technology has become an integral part of undergraduate mathematics, particularly the use of technology to solve problems (i.e., the use of computation). In probability and statistics, this push has resulted in several projects designing and assessing tools that are conjectured to be advantageous to students and their learning. Despite this trend, minimal research exists on how students perceive the use of computational tools in their courses. As such, we designed a brief survey for students enrolled in introductory probability and statistics at a university in the Northeastern United States. Using thematic analysis, we qualitatively analyzed these survey responses to explore their perceptions of the integration of computation into their courses. Three themes were identified, relating to features of tools, augmentation of actions, and long-term benefits. This exploration of students’ perceptions allows us to better understand their views on computation and the need for professors to make instructional goals explicit.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2222337
- PAR ID:
- 10639693
- Publisher / Repository:
- Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Computational methods have become increasingly used in both academia and industry. At the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, the Department of Materials Science and Engineering (MSE), as part of a university-funded educational innovation program, has integrated computation throughout its undergraduate courses since 2014. Within this curriculum, students are asked to solve practical problems related to their coursework using computational tools in all required courses and some electives. Partly in response to feedback from students, we have expanded our current curriculum to include more computational modules. A computational module was added to the freshman Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering class; thus, students will be expected to use computational tools from their first year onwards. In this paper, we survey students who are currently taking courses with integrated computation to explore the effects of gradually introducing students to programming as well as both macro- and micro-scale simulations over multiple years. We investigate the improving confidence level of students, their attitude towards computational tools, and their satisfaction with our curriculum reform. We also updated our survey to be more detailed and consistent between classes to aid in further improvements of our MSE curriculum.more » « less
-
This research paper systematically identifies the perceptions of learning machine learning (ML) topics. To keep up with the ever-increasing need for professionals with ML expertise, for-profit and non-profit organizations conduct a wide range of ML-related courses at undergraduate and graduate levels. Despite the availability of ML-related education materials, there is lack of understanding how students perceive ML-related topics and the dissemination of ML-related topics. A systematic categorization of students' perceptions of these courses can aid educators in understanding the challenges that students face, and use that understanding for better dissemination of ML-related topics in courses. The goal of this paper is to help educators teach machine learning (ML) topics by providing an experience report of students' perceptions related to learning ML. We accomplish our research goal by conducting an empirical study where we deploy a survey with 83 students across five academic institutions. These students are recruited from a mixture of undergraduate and graduate courses. We apply a qualitative analysis technique called open coding to identify challenges that students encounter while studying ML-related topics. Using the same qualitative analysis technique we identify quality aspects do students prioritize ML-related topics. From our survey, we identify 11 challenges that students face when learning about ML topics, amongst which data quality is the most frequent, followed by hardware-related challenges. We observe the majority of the students prefer hands-on projects over theoretical lectures. Furthermore, we find the surveyed students to consider ethics, security, privacy, correctness, and performance as essential considerations while developing ML-based systems. Based on our findings, we recommend educators who teach ML-related courses to (i) incorporate hands-on projects to teach ML-related topics, (ii) dedicate course materials related to data quality, (iii) use lightweight virtualization tools to showcase computationally intensive topics, such as deep neural networks, and (iv) empirical evaluation of how large language models can be used in ML-related education.more » « less
-
Digital citizenship, defined as exhibiting appropriate and responsible behavior with digital technology use, is an essential component of technology education. The purpose of this study was to examine K-12 educators’ perceptions of their students’ digital citizenship knowledge and practices as they relate to cyberbullying, digital footprint, digital privacy, digital netiquette, and digital identity. One hundred and seven educators responded to a survey on digital citizenship practices. Based on the educators’ perceptions, student understanding and practice of digital citizenship were rated as not well for most of the items on the survey. While educators’ perceptions of their students’ digital citizenship practices did not vary among school levels or based on their roles as teachers or technology coaches, educators who taught digital citizenship had higher perceptions of their students’ digital citizenship practices.more » « less
-
Although engineering is becoming increasingly important in K-12 education, previous research has demonstrated that, similar to the general population, K-12 teachers typically hold inaccurate perceptions of engineering, which affects their ability to provide students with relevant engineering experiences. Studies have shown that K-12 teachers often confuse the work of engineers with that of automotive mechanics or construction workers or assume that engineering is only for “super smart” students who are naturally gifted or who come from higher socioeconomic backgrounds. This indicates that many teachers do not understand the nature of engineering work and have stereotypical attitudes about who is qualified to be an engineer. These inaccurate perceptions of engineering among K-12 teachers may influence the way that teachers introduce engineering practices to their students and make connections between engineering and the other STEM disciplines. In addition, teacher self-efficacy has been shown to not only influence teachers’ willingness to engage with a particular topic, but also to have a significant influence on the motivation and achievement of their students. Research also indicates that high-efficacy teachers typically exert more effort and utilize more effective instructional strategies than low-efficacy teachers. The goal of this study was to examine the perceptions that pre-service K-12 teachers hold about engineers and engineering, and to further explore how those perceptions influence their self-efficacy with teaching engineering and beliefs about what skills and resources are necessary to teach engineering in a K-12 classroom. We first developed a survey instrument that included questions taken from two previously published instruments: the Design, Engineering, and Technology survey and the Teaching Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale for K-12 Teachers. Forty-two students enrolled in an undergraduate program at {Name Redacted} in which students simultaneously pursue a bachelor’s degree in a STEM field and K-12 teacher licensure completed the survey. Based on survey responses, six participants, representing a range of self-efficacy scores and majors, were selected to participate in interviews. In these interviews, participants were asked questions about their perceptions of engineers and were also asked to sort a list of characteristics based on whether they applied to engineers or not. Finally, interview participants were asked questions about their confidence in their ability to teach engineering and about what skills and/or resources they would require to be able to teach engineering in their future classrooms. The results of this study indicated that the participants’ perceptions of engineering and engineers did impact their self-efficacy with teaching engineering and their beliefs about how well engineering could be incorporated into other STEM subjects. A recurring theme among participants with low self-efficacy was a lack of exposure to engineering and inaccurate perceptions of the nature of engineering work. These pre-service teachers felt that they would not be able to teach engineering to K-12 students because they did not personally have much exposure to engineering or knowledge about engineering work. In future work, we will investigate how providing pre-service teachers with training in engineering education and exposure to engineers and engineering students impacts both their perceptions of engineering and self-efficacy with teaching engineering.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
