An official website of the United States government
Technology has become an integral part of undergraduate mathematics, particularly the use of technology to solve problems (i.e., the use of computation). In probability and statistics, this push has resulted in several projects designing and assessing tools that are conjectured to be advantageous to students and their learning. Despite this trend, minimal research exists on how students perceive the use of computational tools in their courses. As such, we designed a brief survey for students enrolled in introductory probability and statistics at a university in the Northeastern United States. Using thematic analysis, we qualitatively analyzed these survey responses to explore their perceptions of the integration of computation into their courses. Three themes were identified, relating to features of tools, augmentation of actions, and long-term benefits. This exploration of students’ perceptions allows us to better understand their views on computation and the need for professors to make instructional goals explicit.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on March 1, 2026
Computational tools' mediation of argumentation in undergraduate probability and statistics.
As computation becomes increasingly central to mathematics education, instructors must balance competing forces when choosing which computational tools to use in their courses. This is compounded in probability and statistics where computation is widely used. Grounded in a social constructivist perspective, we believe that tools mediate our activities and that different tools play different mediational roles. As such, this study explores how different computational tools mediate undergraduate students' mathematical activity of argumentation. Using Toulmin’s argument model, this research investigates how two classes in probability and statistics using different computational tools, R or Minitab, performed on a mirrored assignment. Through analysis of students’ assignments, a difference emerged across the classes use of visuals. Our findings suggest Minitab promoted more deliberate consideration and use of visuals than R, leading to a difference in arguments produced by the students.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2222337
- PAR ID:
- 10639691
- Publisher / Repository:
- The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Computational methods have become increasingly used in both academia and industry. At the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, the Department of Materials Science and Engineering (MSE), as part of a university-funded educational innovation program, has integrated computation throughout its undergraduate courses since 2014. Within this curriculum, students are asked to solve practical problems related to their coursework using computational tools in all required courses and some electives. Partly in response to feedback from students, we have expanded our current curriculum to include more computational modules. A computational module was added to the freshman Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering class; thus, students will be expected to use computational tools from their first year onwards. In this paper, we survey students who are currently taking courses with integrated computation to explore the effects of gradually introducing students to programming as well as both macro- and micro-scale simulations over multiple years. We investigate the improving confidence level of students, their attitude towards computational tools, and their satisfaction with our curriculum reform. We also updated our survey to be more detailed and consistent between classes to aid in further improvements of our MSE curriculum.more » « less
-
Abstract This study explored how different formats of instructional visuals affect the accuracy of students' metacognitive judgments. Undergraduates (n = 133) studied a series of five biology texts and made judgments of learning. Students were assigned randomly to study the texts only (text only), study the texts with provided visuals (provided visuals group), study the texts and generate their own visuals (learner‐generated visuals group), or study the texts and observe animations of instructor‐generated visuals (instructor‐generated visuals group). After studying the texts and making judgments of learning, all students completed multiple‐choice comprehension tests on each text. The learner‐generated and instructor‐generated visuals groups exhibited significantly higher relative judgment accuracy than the text only and provided visuals groups, though this effect was relatively small. The learner‐generated visuals group also required more study time and was more likely to report the use of visual cues when making their judgments of learning.more » « less
-
Lynch, Collin F.; Merceron, Agathe; Desmarais, Michel; Nkambou, Roger (Ed.)Students’ interactions with online tools can provide us with insights into their study and work habits. Prior research has shown that these habits, even as simple as the number of actions or the time spent on online platforms can distinguish between the higher performing students and low-performers. These habits are also often used to predict students’ performance in classes. One key feature of these actions that is often overlooked is how and when the students transition between different online platforms. In this work, we study sequences of student transitions between online tools in blended courses and identify which habits make the most difference between the higher and lower performing groups. While our results showed that most of the time students focus on a single tool, we were able to find patterns in their transitions to differentiate high and low performing groups. These findings can help instructors to provide procedural guidance to the students, as well as to identify harmful habits and make timely interventions.more » « less
-
There is increasing awareness that data science and computational thinking are critical skills for undergraduates to develop but these can be difficult to integrate into undergraduate Biology classes. In this module, we describe how we have used a system for learning the programming language R that focuses on building students? skills and confidence in data exploration, management, and visualization. This activity pairs a hands-on virtual experiment where students simulate animal movements and social interactions to provide a friendly introduction to basic data science for biologists. During the activity, students play the ?Bat Game?, an online game which students access via an internet browser. Each student controls the movement decisions of one bat within a social group. The bats must search for cows they can bite to get a meal of blood. Students take the roles of bats in a series of foraging tasks. Students must follow ?rules? and attempt to match their overall actions to those of their group members under different scenarios. The game platform collects all the locations of all bats in the game. After playing the game, students export the data they just created and analyze it to learn how to detect known patterns through basic summaries and plotting in R. All analyses and programming skills are presented in one cohesive R Markdown file, where students can read about the goals of each coding chunk, can run each chunk, and then answer questions about the biology of the social system as well as basic questions about the code used in the analyses. This approach decouples coding from statistics, assumes no prior knowledge, and uses a charismatic species to incentivize student participation. This module can be used in many courses including lab sections of large-enrollment introductory biology courses as well as smaller upper-level coursesmore » « less
