An official website of the United States government
Abstract Compound floods are often thought of as large, infrequent floods during which extremes of coastal sea level and/or river flow combine with each other or additional factors (e.g., tides and rainfall) to induce major flooding. However, little is known about the potentially compound nature of more frequent, lower‐level floods. Here, we introduce the term “compound minor floods” to define minor floods composed of two or more water‐level sources. We use the Delaware River Estuary as a case study to investigate the prevalence and composition of these minor compound floods along the extent of a tidal river. We apply multiple linear regression to a 22‐year time series of coastal water levels and river discharge to establish the contributions of tides, nontidal open‐ocean effects, and river discharge to minor flood events at eight locations along the tidal Delaware River. We find that most minor flood events are compound in nature, requiring at least two components (e.g., tides and river discharge) to initiate flooding. We identify spatial structure in the relative importance of oceanographic and riverine contributions to minor flooding along the tidal reach of the estuary. These results suggest that incorporating fluvial components into minor flooding assessments is important to fully characterize flood risk along tidal rivers and estuaries.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on May 16, 2026
Analyzing Compound Flooding Drivers Across the US Gulf Coast States
Abstract Analyzing flood events has been the focus of numerous studies across local, regional, and global scales, aiming to understand their magnitude, drivers, and spatiotemporal distributions. Traditionally, flood hazards are defined by analyzing the likelihood of flood drivers exceeding their respective thresholds. This approach relies on events around gauge locations with accessible records. The availability of reanalysis and satellite data sets now allows us to leverage data from multiple flood reporting agencies to examine various flood event types, including compound and non‐compound events, and their drivers. We analyzed three decades of flood events in the US Gulf Coast states, where compound flood events are common. We found that rainfall is the predominant driver, contributing to over 45% of reported floods classified as compound events. Fluvial and pluvial floods are more frequent and severe during tropical seasons, and especially during the Fall compared with other calendar seasons.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2223893
- PAR ID:
- 10640507
- Publisher / Repository:
- AGU
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 9
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Compound flooding events are a threat to many coastal regions and can have widespread socio-economic implications. However, their frequency of occurrence, underlying flood drivers, and direct link to past socio-economic losses are largely unknown despite being key to supporting risk and adaptation assessments. Here, we present an impact-based analysis of compound flooding for 203 coastal counties along the U.S. Gulf and East coasts by combining data from multiple flood drivers and socio-economic loss information from 1980 to 2018. We find that ~80% of all flood events recorded in our study area were compound rather than univariate. In addition, we show that historical compound flooding events in most counties were driven by more than two flood drivers (hydrological, meteorological, and/or oceanographic) and distinct spatial clusters exist that exhibit variability in the underlying driver of compound flood events. Furthermore, we find that in more than 80% of the counties, over 80% of recorded property and crop losses were linked to compound flooding. Nearly 80% of counties have a higher median loss from compound than univariate events. For these counties, the median property loss is over 26 times greater, and the median crop loss is over 76 times greater for compound events on average. Our analysis overcomes some of the limitations of previous compound-event studies based on pre-defined flood drivers and offers new insights into the complex relationship between hazards and associated socio-economic impacts.more » « less
-
Abstract Tide gauge water levels are commonly used as a proxy for flood incidence on land. These proxies are useful for projecting how sea‐level rise (SLR) will increase the frequency of coastal flooding. However, tide gauges do not account for land‐based sources of coastal flooding and therefore flood thresholds and the proxies derived from them likely underestimate the current and future frequency of coastal flooding. Here we present a new sensor framework for measuring the incidence of coastal floods that captures both subterranean and land‐based contributions to flooding. The low‐cost, open‐source sensor framework consists of a storm drain water level sensor, roadway camera, and wireless gateway that transmit data in real‐time. During 5 months of deployment in the Town of Beaufort, North Carolina, 24 flood events were recorded. Twenty‐five percent of those events were driven by land‐based sources—rainfall, combined with moderate high tides and reduced capacity in storm drains. Consequently, we find that flood frequency is higher than that suggested by proxies that rely exclusively on tide gauge water levels for determining flood incidence. This finding likely extends to other locations where stormwater networks are at a reduced drainage capacity due to SLR. Our results highlight the benefits of instrumenting stormwater networks directly to capture multiple drivers of coastal flooding. More accurate estimates of the frequency and drivers of floods in low‐lying coastal communities can enable the development of more effective long‐term adaptation strategies.more » « less
-
Sharma, Ashish (Ed.)Floods occur everywhere and in every season. Yet, most studies have focused only on annual maximum floods (AMFs), their climatology, and the associated impacts. Given that monthly/seasonal floods also cause significant damage and disruptions to daily life, this study may be the first to explore winter flood hydroclimatology, a predominantly a non-AMF season, and its associated large-scale climate drivers over the Coterminous US (CONUS). Using a mixed-effects model, we find that the influence of various hydroclimate predictors on winter floods is largely consistent within subregions. Antecedent land-surface conditions are crucial for winter floods in inland areas, while the Pacific sea surface temperatures (SSTs) significantly affects coastal watersheds. The Atlantic SSTs impact winter floods in the south and northeast, while atmospheric conditions influence the Midwest and California. Additional analysis reveals that damage from winter floods is more widespread compared to AMFs across the nation, affecting the entire eastern seaboard, Southwest US, and over the Great Lakes region. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of floods across all seasons (non-AMFs) is critical for developing effective mitigation measures, as it provides information on impacts and required compensation for smaller return period floods.more » « less
-
Abstract. In coastal regions, compound flooding can arise from a combination of different drivers such as storm surges, high tides, excess river discharge, and rainfall. Compound flood potential is often assessed by quantifying the dependence and joint probabilities of the flood drivers using multivariate models. However, most of these studies assume that all extreme events originate from a single population. This assumption may not be valid for regions where flooding can arise from different generation processes, e.g., tropical cyclones (TCs) and extratropical cyclones (ETCs). Here we present a flexible copula-based statistical framework to assess compound flood potential from multiple flood drivers while explicitly accounting for different storm types. The proposed framework is applied to Gloucester City, New Jersey, and St. Petersburg, Florida as case studies. Our results highlight the importance of characterizing the contributions from TCs and non-TCs separately to avoid potential underestimation of the compound flood potential. In both study regions, TCs modulate the tails of the joint distributions (events with higher return periods) while non-TC events have a strong effect on events with low to moderate joint return periods. We show that relying solely on TCs may be inadequate when estimating compound flood risk in coastal catchments that are also exposed to other storm types. We also assess the impact of non-classified storms that are neither linked to TCs or ETCs in the region (such as locally generated convective rainfall events and remotely forced storm surges). The presented study utilizes historical data and analyzes two populations, but the framework is flexible and can be extended to account for additional storm types (e.g., storms with certain tracks or other characteristics) or can be used with model output data including hindcasts or future projections.more » « less
