More Like this

1. AI ‐Assisted Protein–Peptide Complex Prediction in a Practical Setting

   https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.70137  

   Wang, Darren Y; Wang, Luxuan; Mi, Andrew; Wang, Junmei (May 2025, Journal of Computational Chemistry)

   ABSTRACT Accurate prediction of protein–peptide complex structures plays a critical role in structure‐based drug design, including antibody design. Most peptide‐docking benchmark studies were conducted using crystal structures of protein–peptide complexes; as such, the performance of the current peptide docking tools in the practical setting is unknown. Here, the practical setting implies there are no crystal or other experimental structures for the complex, nor for the receptor and peptide. In this work, we have developed a practical docking protocol that incorporated two famous machine learning models, AlphaFold 2 for structural prediction and ANI‐2x for ab initio potential prediction, to achieve a high success rate in modeling protein–peptide complex structures. The docking protocol consists of three major stages. In the first stage, the 3D structure of the receptor is predicted by AlphaFold 2 using the monomer mode, and that of the peptide is predicted by AlphaFold 2 using the multimer mode. We found that it is essential to include the receptor information to generate a high‐quality 3D structure of the peptide. In the second stage, rigid protein–peptide docking is performed using ZDOCK software. In the last stage, the top 10 docking poses are relaxed and refined by ANI‐2x in conjunction with our in‐house geometry optimization algorithm—conjugate gradient with backtracking line search (CG‐BS). CG‐BS was developed by us to more efficiently perform geometry optimization, which takes the potential and force directly from ANI‐2x machine learning models. The docking protocol achieved a very encouraging performance for a set of 62 very challenging protein–peptide systems which had an overall success rate of 34% if only the top 1 docking poses were considered. This success rate increased to 45% if the top 3 docking poses were considered. It is emphasized that this encouraging protein–peptide docking performance was achieved without using any crystal or experimental structures. 

   more » « less
2. A deep dilated convolutional residual network for predicting interchain contacts of protein homodimers

   https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac063  

   Roy, Raj S; Quadir, Farhan; Soltanikazemi, Elham; Cheng, Jianlin (February 2022, Bioinformatics)

   Xu, Jinbo (Ed.)

   Abstract Motivation Deep learning has revolutionized protein tertiary structure prediction recently. The cutting-edge deep learning methods such as AlphaFold can predict high-accuracy tertiary structures for most individual protein chains. However, the accuracy of predicting quaternary structures of protein complexes consisting of multiple chains is still relatively low due to lack of advanced deep learning methods in the field. Because interchain residue–residue contacts can be used as distance restraints to guide quaternary structure modeling, here we develop a deep dilated convolutional residual network method (DRCon) to predict interchain residue–residue contacts in homodimers from residue–residue co-evolutionary signals derived from multiple sequence alignments of monomers, intrachain residue–residue contacts of monomers extracted from true/predicted tertiary structures or predicted by deep learning, and other sequence and structural features. Results Tested on three homodimer test datasets (Homo_std dataset, DeepHomo dataset and CASP-CAPRI dataset), the precision of DRCon for top L/5 interchain contact predictions (L: length of monomer in a homodimer) is 43.46%, 47.10% and 33.50% respectively at 6 Å contact threshold, which is substantially better than DeepHomo and DNCON2_inter and similar to Glinter. Moreover, our experiments demonstrate that using predicted tertiary structure or intrachain contacts of monomers in the unbound state as input, DRCon still performs well, even though its accuracy is lower than using true tertiary structures in the bound state are used as input. Finally, our case study shows that good interchain contact predictions can be used to build high-accuracy quaternary structure models of homodimers. Availability and implementation The source code of DRCon is available at https://github.com/jianlin-cheng/DRCon. The datasets are available at https://zenodo.org/record/5998532#.YgF70vXMKsB. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. 

   more » « less
3. Structural modeling of ion channels using AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold2, and ESMFold

   https://doi.org/10.1080/19336950.2024.2325032  

   Nguyen, Phuong Tran; Harris, Brandon John; Mateos, Diego Lopez; González, Adriana Hernández; Murray, Adam Michael; Yarov-Yarovoy, Vladimir (December 2024, Channels)

   Ion channels play key roles in human physiology and are important targets in drug discovery. The atomic-scale structures of ion channels provide invaluable insights into a fundamental understanding of the molecular mechanisms of channel gating and modulation. Recent breakthroughs in deep learning-based computational methods, such as AlphaFold, RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold have transformed research in protein structure prediction and design. We review the application of AlphaFold, RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold to structural modeling of ion channels using representative voltage-gated ion channels, including human voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channel - NaV1.8, human voltage-gated calcium (CaV) channel – CaV1.1, and human voltage-gated potassium (KV) channel – KV1.3. We compared AlphaFold, RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold structural models of NaV1.8, CaV1.1, and KV1.3 with corresponding cryo-EM structures to assess details of their similarities and differences. Our findings shed light on the strengths and limitations of the current state-of-the-art deep learning-based computational methods for modeling ion channel structures, offering valuable insights to guide their future applications for ion channel research. 

   more » « less
4. MULTICOM2 open-source protein structure prediction system powered by deep learning and distance prediction

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92395-6  

   Wu, Tianqi; Liu, Jian; Guo, Zhiye; Hou, Jie; Cheng, Jianlin (December 2021, Scientific Reports)

   Abstract Protein structure prediction is an important problem in bioinformatics and has been studied for decades. However, there are still few open-source comprehensive protein structure prediction packages publicly available in the field. In this paper, we present our latest open-source protein tertiary structure prediction system—MULTICOM2, an integration of template-based modeling (TBM) and template-free modeling (FM) methods. The template-based modeling uses sequence alignment tools with deep multiple sequence alignments to search for structural templates, which are much faster and more accurate than MULTICOM1. The template-free (ab initio or de novo) modeling uses the inter-residue distances predicted by DeepDist to reconstruct tertiary structure models without using any known structure as template. In the blind CASP14 experiment, the average TM-score of the models predicted by our server predictor based on the MULTICOM2 system is 0.720 for 58 TBM (regular) domains and 0.514 for 38 FM and FM/TBM (hard) domains, indicating that MULTICOM2 is capable of predicting good tertiary structures across the board. It can predict the correct fold for 76 CASP14 domains (95% regular domains and 55% hard domains) if only one prediction is made for a domain. The success rate is increased to 3% for both regular and hard domains if five predictions are made per domain. Moreover, the prediction accuracy of the pure template-free structure modeling method on both TBM and FM targets is very close to the combination of template-based and template-free modeling methods. This demonstrates that the distance-based template-free modeling method powered by deep learning can largely replace the traditional template-based modeling method even on TBM targets that TBM methods used to dominate and therefore provides a uniform structure modeling approach to any protein. Finally, on the 38 CASP14 FM and FM/TBM hard domains, MULTICOM2 server predictors (MULTICOM-HYBRID, MULTICOM-DEEP, MULTICOM-DIST) were ranked among the top 20 automated server predictors in the CASP14 experiment. After combining multiple predictors from the same research group as one entry, MULTICOM-HYBRID was ranked no. 5. The source code of MULTICOM2 is freely available at https://github.com/multicom-toolbox/multicom/tree/multicom_v2.0 . 

   more » « less
5. Assessing the potential of deep learning for protein–ligand docking

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-025-01160-1  

   Morehead, Alex; Giri, Nabin; Liu, Jian; Neupane, Pawan; Cheng, Jianlin (January 2026, Nature Machine Intelligence)

   Abstract The effects of ligand binding on protein structures and their in vivo functions carry numerous implications for modern biomedical research and biotechnology development efforts such as drug discovery. Although several deep learning (DL) methods and benchmarks designed for protein–ligand docking have recently been introduced, so far no previous works have systematically studied the behaviour of the latest docking and structure prediction methods within the broadly applicable context of: (1) using predicted (apo) protein structures for docking (for example, for applicability to new proteins); (2) binding multiple (cofactor) ligands concurrently to a given target protein (for example, for enzyme design); and (3) having no previous knowledge of binding pockets (for example, for generalization to unknown pockets). To enable a deeper understanding of the real-world utility of docking methods, we introduce PoseBench, a comprehensive benchmark for broadly applicable protein–ligand docking. PoseBench enables researchers to rigorously and systematically evaluate DL methods for apo-to-holo protein–ligand docking and protein–ligand structure prediction using both primary ligand and multiligand benchmark datasets, the latter of which we introduce to the DL community. Empirically, using PoseBench, we find that: (1) DL cofolding methods generally outperform comparable conventional and DL docking baseline algorithms, but popular methods such as AlphaFold 3 are still challenged by prediction targets with new protein–ligand binding poses; (2) certain DL cofolding methods are highly sensitive to their input multiple sequence alignments, whereas others are not; and (3) DL methods struggle to strike a balance between structural accuracy and chemical specificity when predicting new or multiligand protein targets. 

   more » « less