An official website of the United States government
The logarithmic law of the wall does not capture the mean flow when a boundary layer is subjected to a strong pressure gradient. In such a boundary layer, the mean flow is affected by the spatio-temporal history of the imposed pressure gradient; and accounting for history effects remains a challenge. This work aims to develop a universal mean flow scaling for boundary layers subjected to arbitrary adverse or/and favourable pressure gradients. We derive from the Navier–Stokes equation a velocity transformation that accounts for the history effects and maps the mean flow to the canonical law of the wall. The transformation is tested against channel flows with a suddenly imposed adverse or favourable pressure gradient, boundary layer flows subjected to an adverse pressure gradient, and Couette–Poiseuille flows with a streamwise pressure gradient. It is found that the transformed velocity profiles follow closely the equilibrium law of the wall.
more »
« less
Moment of momentum integral analysis of turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradient
Turbulent boundary layers on immersed objects can be significantly altered by the pressure gradients imposed by the flow outside the boundary layer. The interaction of turbulence and pressure gradients can lead to complex phenomena such as relaminarization, history effects and flow separation. The angular momentum integral (AMI) equation (Elnahhas & Johnson,J. Fluid Mech., vol. 940, 2022, A36) is extended and applied to high-fidelity simulation datasets of non-zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. The AMI equation provides an exact mathematical equation for quantifying how turbulence, free-stream pressure gradients and other effects alter the skin friction coefficient relative to a baseline laminar boundary layer solution. The datasets explored include flat-plate boundary layers with nearly constant adverse pressure gradients, a boundary layer over the suction surface of a two-dimensional NACA 4412 airfoil and flow over a two-dimensional Gaussian bump. Application of the AMI equation to these datasets maps out the similarities and differences in how boundary layers interact with favourable and adverse pressure gradients in various scenarios. Further, the fractional contribution of the pressure gradient to skin friction attenuation in adverse-pressure-gradient boundary layers appears in the AMI equation as a new Clauser-like parameter with some advantages for understanding similarities and differences related to upstream history effects. The results highlight the applicability of the integral-based analysis to provide quantitative, interpretable assessments of complex boundary layer physics.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2340121
- PAR ID:
- 10650823
- Publisher / Repository:
- Cambridge University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Volume:
- 1002
- ISSN:
- 0022-1120
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- A29
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Motivated by the need for accurate determination of wall shear stress from profile measurements in turbulent boundary layer flows, the total shear stress balance is analysed and reformulated using several well-established semi-empirical relations. The analysis highlights the significant effect that small pressure gradients can have on parameters deduced from data even in nominally zero pressure gradient boundary layers. Using the comprehensive shear stress balance together with the log-law equation, it is shown that friction velocity, roughness length and zero-plane displacement can be determined with only velocity and turbulent shear stress profile measurements at a single streamwise location for nominally zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Application of the proposed analysis to turbulent smooth- and rough-wall experimental data shows that the friction velocity is determined with accuracy comparable to force balances (approximately 1 %–4 %). Additionally, application to boundary layer data from previous studies provides clear evidence that the often cited discrepancy between directly measured friction velocities (e.g. using force balances) and those derived from traditional total shear stress methods is likely due to the small favourable pressure gradient imposed by a fixed cross-section facility. The proposed comprehensive shear stress analysis can account for these small pressure gradients and allows more accurate boundary layer wall shear stress or friction velocity determination using commonly available mean velocity and shear stress profile data from a single streamwise location.more » « less
-
Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are performed to investigate the spatial evolution of flat-plate zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers over long streamwise domains ( $${>}300\delta _i$$ , with $$\delta _i$$ the inflow boundary-layer thickness) at three different Mach numbers, $2.5$ , $4.9$ and $10.9$ , with the surface temperatures ranging from quasiadiabatic to highly cooled conditions. The settlement of turbulence statistics into a fully developed equilibrium state of the turbulent boundary layer has been carefully monitored, either based on the satisfaction of the von Kármán integral equation or by comparing runs with different inflow turbulence generation techniques. The generated DNS database is used to characterize the streamwise evolution of multiple important variables in the high-Mach-number, cold-wall regime, including the skin friction, the Reynolds analogy factor, the shape factor, the Reynolds stresses, and the fluctuating wall quantities. The data confirm the validity of many classic and newer compressibility transformations at moderately high Reynolds numbers (up to friction Reynolds number $$Re_\tau \approx 1200$$ ) and show that, with proper scaling, the sizes of the near-wall streaks and superstructures are insensitive to the Mach number and wall cooling conditions. The strong wall cooling in the hypersonic cold-wall case is found to cause a significant increase in the size of the near-wall turbulence eddies (relative to the boundary-layer thickness), which leads to a reduced-scale separation between the large and small turbulence scales, and in turn to a lack of an outer peak in the spanwise spectra of the streamwise velocity in the logarithmic region.more » « less
-
Recent numerical predictions of turbulent boundary layers subject to very strong Favorable Pressure Gradient (FPG) with high spatial/temporal resolution, i.e. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), have shown a meaningful weakening of the Reynolds shear stresses with a lengthy logarithmic behavior [1,2]. In the present study, assessment of the Shear Stress Transport and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence models (hence- forth SST and SA, respectively) in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations is performed. The main objective is to evaluate the ability of popular turbulence models in capturing the characteristic features present during the quasi-laminarization phenomenon in highly accelerating turbulent boundary layers. A favorable pressure gradient is prescribed by a top converging surface (sink flow) with an approximately constant acceleration parameter of K = 4 . 0 ×10 −6 . Validation of RANS results is carried out by means of a large DNS dataset [1]. Generally speaking, the SA turbulence model has demonstrated the best compromise between accuracy and quick adaptation to the turbulent inflow conditions. Turbulence models properly captured the increasing trend of the freestream and friction velocity in highly accelerated flows; however, they fail to reproduce the decreasing behavior of the skin friction coefficient, which is typical in early stages of the quasi-laminarization process. Both models have shown deficient predictions of the decreasing and logarithmic behavior of Reynolds shear stresses as well as significantly overpredicted the production of Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) in turbulent boundary layers subject to very strong FPG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104494more » « less
-
An incoming canonical spatially developing turbulent boundary layer (SDTBL) over a 2-D curved hill is numerically investigated via the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations plus two eddy-viscosity models: the K−ω SST (henceforth SST) and the Spalart–Allmaras (henceforth SA) turbulence models. A spatially evolving thermal boundary layer has also been included, assuming temperature as a passive scalar (Pr = 0.71) and a turbulent Prandtl number, Prt, of 0.90 for wall-normal turbulent heat flux modeling. The complex flow with a combined strong adverse/favorable streamline curvature-driven pressure gradient caused by concave/convex surface curvatures has been replicated from wind-tunnel experiments from the literature, and the measured velocity and pressure fields have been used for validation purposes (the thermal field was not experimentally measured). Furthermore, direct numerical simulation (DNS) databases from the literature were also employed for the incoming turbulent flow assessment. Concerning first-order statistics, the SA model demonstrated a better agreement with experiments where the turbulent boundary layer remained attached, for instance, in Cp, Cf, and Us predictions. Conversely, the SST model has shown a slightly better match with experiments over the flow separation zone (in terms of Cp and Cf) and in Us profiles just upstream of the bubble. The Reynolds analogy, based on the St/(Cf/2) ratio, holds in zero-pressure gradient (ZPG) zones; however, it is significantly deteriorated by the presence of streamline curvature-driven pressure gradient, particularly due to concave wall curvature or adverse-pressure gradient (APG). In terms of second-order statistics, the SST model has better captured the positively correlated characteristics of u′ and v′ or positive Reynolds shear stresses ( > 0) inside the recirculating zone. Very strong APG induced outer secondary peaks in and turbulence production as well as an evident negative slope on the constant shear layer.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.1154
