An official website of the United States government
Motivated by the need for accurate determination of wall shear stress from profile measurements in turbulent boundary layer flows, the total shear stress balance is analysed and reformulated using several well-established semi-empirical relations. The analysis highlights the significant effect that small pressure gradients can have on parameters deduced from data even in nominally zero pressure gradient boundary layers. Using the comprehensive shear stress balance together with the log-law equation, it is shown that friction velocity, roughness length and zero-plane displacement can be determined with only velocity and turbulent shear stress profile measurements at a single streamwise location for nominally zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Application of the proposed analysis to turbulent smooth- and rough-wall experimental data shows that the friction velocity is determined with accuracy comparable to force balances (approximately 1 %–4 %). Additionally, application to boundary layer data from previous studies provides clear evidence that the often cited discrepancy between directly measured friction velocities (e.g. using force balances) and those derived from traditional total shear stress methods is likely due to the small favourable pressure gradient imposed by a fixed cross-section facility. The proposed comprehensive shear stress analysis can account for these small pressure gradients and allows more accurate boundary layer wall shear stress or friction velocity determination using commonly available mean velocity and shear stress profile data from a single streamwise location.
more »
« less
A universal velocity transformation for boundary layers with pressure gradients
The logarithmic law of the wall does not capture the mean flow when a boundary layer is subjected to a strong pressure gradient. In such a boundary layer, the mean flow is affected by the spatio-temporal history of the imposed pressure gradient; and accounting for history effects remains a challenge. This work aims to develop a universal mean flow scaling for boundary layers subjected to arbitrary adverse or/and favourable pressure gradients. We derive from the Navier–Stokes equation a velocity transformation that accounts for the history effects and maps the mean flow to the canonical law of the wall. The transformation is tested against channel flows with a suddenly imposed adverse or favourable pressure gradient, boundary layer flows subjected to an adverse pressure gradient, and Couette–Poiseuille flows with a streamwise pressure gradient. It is found that the transformed velocity profiles follow closely the equilibrium law of the wall.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2131942
- PAR ID:
- 10483541
- Publisher / Repository:
- Cambridge University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Volume:
- 970
- ISSN:
- 0022-1120
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Turbulent boundary layers on immersed objects can be significantly altered by the pressure gradients imposed by the flow outside the boundary layer. The interaction of turbulence and pressure gradients can lead to complex phenomena such as relaminarization, history effects and flow separation. The angular momentum integral (AMI) equation (Elnahhas & Johnson,J. Fluid Mech., vol. 940, 2022, A36) is extended and applied to high-fidelity simulation datasets of non-zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. The AMI equation provides an exact mathematical equation for quantifying how turbulence, free-stream pressure gradients and other effects alter the skin friction coefficient relative to a baseline laminar boundary layer solution. The datasets explored include flat-plate boundary layers with nearly constant adverse pressure gradients, a boundary layer over the suction surface of a two-dimensional NACA 4412 airfoil and flow over a two-dimensional Gaussian bump. Application of the AMI equation to these datasets maps out the similarities and differences in how boundary layers interact with favourable and adverse pressure gradients in various scenarios. Further, the fractional contribution of the pressure gradient to skin friction attenuation in adverse-pressure-gradient boundary layers appears in the AMI equation as a new Clauser-like parameter with some advantages for understanding similarities and differences related to upstream history effects. The results highlight the applicability of the integral-based analysis to provide quantitative, interpretable assessments of complex boundary layer physics.more » « less
-
The spatiotemporal dynamics of a turbulent boundary layer subjected to an unsteady pressure gradient are studied. A dynamic sequence of favourable to adverse pressure gradients (FAPGs) is imposed by deforming a section of the wind tunnel ceiling, transitioning the pressure gradient from zero to a strong FAPG within 0.07 s. At the end of the transient, the acceleration parameter is K=6x10^-6 in the favourable pressure gradient (FPG) region and K=-4.8x10^-6 in the adverse pressure gradient (APG) region. The resulting unsteady response of the boundary layer is compared with equivalent steady pressure gradient cases in terms of turbulent statistics and coherent structures. While the steady FAPG effects, as shown by Parthasarathy & Saxton-Fox (2023), caused upstream stabilisation in the FPG, a milder APG response downstream, and the formation of an internal layer, the unsteady case presented in this paper shows a reduced stabilisation in the FPG region, a stronger APG response and a weaker internal layer. This altered response is hypothesised to stem from the different spatiotemporal pressure gradient histories experienced by turbulent structures when the pressure gradient changes at a time scale comparable to their convection.more » « less
-
A transient stability flow analysis is performed using the unsteady laminar boundary layer equations. The flow dynamics are studied via the Navier–Stokes equations. In the case of external spatially developing flow, the differential equations are reduced via Prandtl or boundary-layer assumptions, consisting of continuity and momentum conservation equations. Prescription of streamwise pressure gradients (decelerating and accelerating flows) is carried out by an impulsively started Falkner–Skan (FS) or wedge-flow similarity flow solution in the case of flat plate or a Blasius solution for particular zero-pressure gradient case. The obtained mean streamwise velocity and its derivatives from FS flows are then inserted into the well-known Orr–Sommerfeld equation of small disturbances at different dimensionless times (τ). Finally, the corresponding eigenvalues are dynamically computed for temporal stability analysis. A finite difference algorithm is effectively applied to solve the Orr–Sommerfeld equations. It is observed that flow acceleration or favorable pressure gradients (FPGs) lead to a significantly shorter transient period before reaching steady-state conditions, as the developed shear layer is notably thinner compared to cases with adverse pressure gradients (APGs). During the transient phase (i.e., for τ<1), the majority of the flow modifications are confined to the innermost 20–25% of the boundary layer, in proximity to the wall. In the context of temporal flow stability, the magnitude of the pressure gradient is pivotal in determining the streamwise extent of the Tollmien–Schlichting (TS) waves. In highly accelerated laminar flows, these waves experience considerable elongation. Conversely, under the influence of a strong adverse pressure gradient, the characteristic streamwise length of the smallest unstable wavelength, which is necessary for destabilization via TS waves, is significantly reduced. Furthermore, flows subjected to acceleration (β > 0) exhibit a higher propensity to transition towards a more stable state during the initial transient phase. For instance, the time response required to reach the steady-state critical Reynolds number was approximately 1τ for β = 0.18 (FPG) and τ = 6.8 for β = −0.18 (APG).more » « less
-
An incoming canonical spatially developing turbulent boundary layer (SDTBL) over a 2-D curved hill is numerically investigated via the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations plus two eddy-viscosity models: the K−ω SST (henceforth SST) and the Spalart–Allmaras (henceforth SA) turbulence models. A spatially evolving thermal boundary layer has also been included, assuming temperature as a passive scalar (Pr = 0.71) and a turbulent Prandtl number, Prt, of 0.90 for wall-normal turbulent heat flux modeling. The complex flow with a combined strong adverse/favorable streamline curvature-driven pressure gradient caused by concave/convex surface curvatures has been replicated from wind-tunnel experiments from the literature, and the measured velocity and pressure fields have been used for validation purposes (the thermal field was not experimentally measured). Furthermore, direct numerical simulation (DNS) databases from the literature were also employed for the incoming turbulent flow assessment. Concerning first-order statistics, the SA model demonstrated a better agreement with experiments where the turbulent boundary layer remained attached, for instance, in Cp, Cf, and Us predictions. Conversely, the SST model has shown a slightly better match with experiments over the flow separation zone (in terms of Cp and Cf) and in Us profiles just upstream of the bubble. The Reynolds analogy, based on the St/(Cf/2) ratio, holds in zero-pressure gradient (ZPG) zones; however, it is significantly deteriorated by the presence of streamline curvature-driven pressure gradient, particularly due to concave wall curvature or adverse-pressure gradient (APG). In terms of second-order statistics, the SST model has better captured the positively correlated characteristics of u′ and v′ or positive Reynolds shear stresses ( > 0) inside the recirculating zone. Very strong APG induced outer secondary peaks in and turbulence production as well as an evident negative slope on the constant shear layer.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.570
