skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on October 1, 2026

Title: The Energy Exascale Earth System Model Version 3: 1. Overview of the Atmospheric Component
Abstract This paper describes the atmospheric component of the US Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) version 3. Significant updates have been made to the atmospheric physics compared to earlier versions. Specifically, interactive gas chemistry has been implemented, along with improved representations of aerosols and dust emissions. A new stratiform cloud microphysics scheme more physically treats ice processes and aerosol‐cloud interactions. The deep convection parameterization has been largely improved with sophisticated microphysics for convective clouds, making model convection sensitive to large‐scale dynamics, and incorporating the dynamical and physical effects of organized mesoscale convection. Improvements in aerosol wet removal processes and parameter re‐tuning of key aerosol and cloud processes have improved model aerosol radiative forcing. The model's vertical resolution has increased from 72 to 80 layers with the extra eight layers added in the lower stratosphere to better simulate the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation. These improvements have enhanced E3SM's capability to couple aerosol, chemistry, and biogeochemistry and reduced some long‐standing biases in simulating tropical variability. Compared to its predecessors, the model shows a much stronger signal for the Madden‐Julian Oscillation, Kelvin waves, mixed Rossby‐gravity waves, and eastward inertia‐gravity waves. Aerosol radiative forcing has been considerably reduced and is now better aligned with community best estimates, leading to significantly improved skill in simulating historical temperature records. Its simulated mean‐state climate is largely comparable to E3SMv2, but with some notable degradation in shortwave cloud radiative effect, precipitable water, and surface wind stress, which will be addressed in future updates.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2135749
PAR ID:
10651618
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  more » ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;   « less
Publisher / Repository:
AGU
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Volume:
17
Issue:
10
ISSN:
1942-2466
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Aerosol‐cloud interactions (ACI) in warm clouds are the primary source of uncertainty in effective radiative forcing (ERF) during the historical period and, by extension, inferred climate sensitivity. The ERF due to ACI (ERFaci) is composed of the radiative forcing due to changes in cloud microphysics and cloud adjustments to microphysics. Here, we examine the processes that drive ERFaci using a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE) hosted in CAM6. Observational constraints on the PPE result in substantial constraints in the response of cloud microphysics and macrophysics to anthropogenic aerosol, but only minimal constraint on ERFaci. Examination of cloud and radiation processes in the PPE reveal buffering of ERFaci by the interaction of precipitation efficiency and radiative susceptibility. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract. It is known that aqueous haze particles can be activated into cloud droplets in a supersaturated environment. However, haze–cloud interactions have not been fully explored, partly because haze particles are not represented in most cloud-resolving models. Here, we conduct a series of large-eddy simulations (LESs) of a cloud in a convection chamber using a haze-capable Eulerian-based bin microphysics scheme to explore haze–cloud interactions over a wide range of aerosol injection rates. Results show that the cloud is in a slow microphysics regime at low aerosol injection rates, where the cloud responds slowly to an environmental change and droplet deactivation is negligible. The cloud is in a fast microphysics regime at moderate aerosol injection rates, where the cloud responds quickly to an environmental change and haze–cloud interactions are important. More interestingly, two more microphysics regimes are observed at high aerosol injection rates due to haze–cloud interactions. Cloud oscillation is driven by the oscillation of the mean supersaturation around the critical supersaturation of aerosol due to haze–cloud interactions. Cloud collapse happens under weaker forcing of supersaturation where the chamber transfers cloud droplets to haze particles efficiently, leading to a significant decrease (collapse) in cloud droplet number concentration. One special case of cloud collapse is the haze-only regime. It occurs at extremely high aerosol injection rates, where droplet activation is inhibited, and the sedimentation of haze particles is balanced by the aerosol injection rate. Our results suggest that haze particles and their interactions with cloud droplets should be considered, especially in polluted conditions. 
    more » « less
  3. Deep convective clouds (DCCs) are associated with the vertical ascent of air from the lower to the upper atmosphere. They appear in various forms such as thunderstorms, supercells, and squall lines. These convective systems play important roles in the hydrological cycle, Earth’s radiative budget, and the general circulation of the atmosphere. Changes in aerosol (both cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating particles) affect cloud microphysics and dynamics, and thereby influence convective intensity, precipitation, and the radiative effects of deep clouds and their cirrus anvils. However, the very complex dynamics and cloud microphysics of DCCs means that many of these processes are not yet accurately quantified in observations and models. This chapter outlines the main ways in which changes in aerosol affect the microphysical, dynamical, and radiative properties of DCCs. Aerosol interactions with DCCs depend on aerosol properties, storm dynamics, and meteorological conditions. When aerosol particles are light-absorbing, such as soot from industry or biomass burning, the aerosol radiative effects can alter the meteorological conditions under which DCCs form. These radiative effects modify temperature profiles and planetary boundary layer heights, thus changing atmospheric stability and circulation, and affecting the onset and development of DCCs. These large-scale effects, such as the effect of anthropogenic aerosol on the East and South Asian monsoons, can be simulated in coarse-resolution models. These processes are described in Chapter 13. This chapter is concerned with aerosol interactions with DCC systems ranging from individual clouds to mesoscale convective systems. Increases in cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) can enhance cloud droplet number concentrations and decrease droplet sizes, thereby narrowing the droplet size spectrum. For DCCs, a narrowed droplet size spectrum suppresses warm rain formation (rain derived from non-ice-phase processes), allowing the transport of more, smaller droplets to altitudes below 0°C. This may result in (i) freezing of more supercooled water, thereby enhancing latent heating from icerelated microphysical processes and invigorating storms (ice-phase invigoration); (ii) modification of ice-related microphysical processes, which changes cold pools, precipitation rates, and hailstone frequency and size; (iii) expansion of the mixed-phase zone and decreases in the cloud glaciation temperature; and (iv) slowing down of cloud dissipation, resulting in larger cloud cover and cloud depth in the stratiform and anvil regions due to numerous smaller ice particles. The increased cloud cover and cloud depth constitute an influence of aerosol on the cloud radiative effect. Reduced diurnal temperature variation has been observed and simulated as a result of enhanced daytime cooling and nighttime warming by expanded anvil cloud area in polluted environments. However, the global radiative effect of aerosol interactions with DCCs remains to be quantified. 
    more » « less
  4. Simulating the warmth and equability of past hothouse climates has been a challenge since the inception of paleoclimate modeling. The newest generation of Earth system models (ESMs) has shown substantial improvements in the ability to simulate the early Eocene global mean surface temperature (GMST) and equator-to-pole gradient. Results using the Community Earth System Model suggest that parameterizations of atmospheric radiation, convection, and clouds largely determine the Eocene GMST and are responsible for improvements in the new ESMs, but they have less direct influence on the equator-to-pole temperature gradient. ESMs still have difficulty simulating some regional and seasonal temperatures, although improved data reconstructions of chronology, spatial coverage, and seasonal resolution are needed for more robust model assessment. Looking forward, key processes including radiation and clouds need to be benchmarked and improved using more accurate models of limited domain/physics. Earth system processes need to be better explored, leveraging the increasing ESM resolution and complexity. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Storms operated by moist convection and the condensation of CH4or H2S have been observed on Uranus and Neptune. However, the mechanism of cloud formation, thermal structure, and mixing efficiency of ice giant weather layers remains unclear. In this paper, we show that moist convection is limited by heat transport on giant planets, especially on ice giants where planetary heat flux is weak. Latent heat associated with condensation and evaporation can efficiently bring heat across the weather layer through precipitations. This effect was usually neglected in previous studies without a complete hydrological cycle. We first derive analytical theories and show that the upper limit of cloud density is determined by the planetary heat flux and microphysics of clouds but is independent of the atmospheric composition. The eddy diffusivity of moisture depends on the planetary heat fluxes, atmospheric composition, and surface gravity but is not directly related to cloud microphysics. We then conduct convection- and cloud-resolving simulations with SNAP to validate our analytical theory. The simulated cloud density and eddy diffusivity are smaller than the results acquired from the equilibrium cloud condensation model and mixing length theory by several orders of magnitude but consistent with our analytical solutions. Meanwhile, the mass-loading effect of CH4and H2S leads to superadiabatic and stable weather layers. Our simulations produced three cloud layers that are qualitatively similar to recent observations. This study has important implications for cloud formation and eddy mixing in giant planet atmospheres in general and observations for future space missions and ground-based telescopes. 
    more » « less