skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • No Consistent Effect of Migration on Speciation Rates in Two Avian Superfamilies: A Check on the Robustness of Trait-Dependent Diversification Methods
Title: No Consistent Effect of Migration on Speciation Rates in Two Avian Superfamilies: A Check on the Robustness of Trait-Dependent Diversification Methods
Abstract Seasonal migration is performed by taxonomically diverse groups across the planet’s oceans and continents. Migration has been hypothesized to promote speciation through a variety of mechanisms that may initiate reproductive isolation and population divergence, such as temporal or spatial migratory divides, migration “falloffs,” or the colonization of new, geographically isolated breeding areas.  Migration has also been implicated in recent population divergence within a handful of bird species; however, it is unknown whether migration is generally associated with higher speciation rates. We sought to test this question in two large clades of New World birds with diverse migratory phenotypes, the suboscines and the Emberizoidea, employing three state-of-the-art comparative methods of trait-based diversification: estimates of tip speciation rates using 1) BAMM and 2) ClaDS, and 3) hidden-state speciation extinction models. Our results differed across methods and across taxonomic scales, suggesting an acute need to corroborate inferences across different frameworks and data sets prior to concluding that a given trait has, in fact, promoted diversification. Overall, and based upon the majority of results across different methods, we conclude that there is no methodologically consistent evidence of faster speciation in migratory lineages in these groups.  We discuss the biological implications of this finding, as well as the challenges of inference posed by current trait-based diversification methods.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2209166 2143004 2526549
PAR ID:
10654509
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Editor(s):
Beaulieu, Jeremy
Publisher / Repository:
Systematic Biology
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Systematic Biology
ISSN:
1063-5157
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Systematic Biology)
    Eaton, Deren (Ed.)
    Abstract Color polymorphism—two or more heritable color phenotypes maintained within a single breeding population—is an extreme type of intraspecific diversity widespread across the tree of life. Color polymorphism is hypothesized to be an engine for speciation, where morph loss or divergence between distinct color morphs within a species results in the rapid evolution of new lineages, and thus, color polymorphic lineages are expected to display elevated diversification rates. Multiple species in the lizard family Lacertidae are color polymorphic, making them an ideal group to investigate the evolutionary history of this trait and its influence on macroevolution. Here, we produce a comprehensive species-level phylogeny of the lizard family Lacertidae to reconstruct the evolutionary history of color polymorphism and test if color polymorphism has been a driver of diversification. Accounting for phylogenetic uncertainty with multiple phylogenies and simulation studies, we estimate an ancient origin of color polymorphism (111 Ma) within the Lacertini tribe (subfamily Lacertinae). Color polymorphism most likely evolved few times in the Lacertidae and has been lost at a much faster rate than gained. Evolutionary transitions to color polymorphism are associated with shifts in increased net diversification rate in this family of lizards. Taken together, our empirical results support long-standing theoretical expectations that color polymorphism is a driver of diversification.[Color polymorphism; Lacertidae; state-dependent speciation extinction models; trait-dependent diversification.] 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Journal of Avian Biology)
    As individual tracking devices and year‐round genetic sampling become more accessible, research on the historically understudied nonbreeding period has exploded in the past decade. These studies are revealing tremendous inter‐ and intraspecific variation in migratory, molting, and other nonbreeding strategies, thereby informing efforts to protect bird populations throughout the entire annual cycle. However, we still have much to learn about where and when nonbreeding adaptive variation influences reproductive isolation and speciation. Previous work has demonstrated that some adaptations to conditions in different nonbreeding areas or migratory routes can fuel diversification by precluding opportunities for diverging lineages to interbreed or, in instances where lineages do interbreed, manifesting as disadvantageous phenotypes in hybrids. In this paper, we provide an overview of both established and speculative processes through which the primary nonbreeding events in the avian annual cycle (i.e. molt, migration, and overwintering) may interact to regulate gene flow between avian lineages. Although the relatively few but well‐described examples of divergence in nonbreeding phenotypes contributing to reproductive isolation suggest nonbreeding divergence is a common mode of speciation in birds, a growing number of population genetic studies reporting nonbreeding divergence in the absence of reproductive isolation seemingly suggest the opposite conclusion. We outline processes that could result in this apparent contradiction and propose general comparative frameworks to test factors that may predictably mediate the relationship between nonbreeding divergence and reproductive isolation. In the past, a shortage of nonbreeding natural history and population genetic data have impeded our ability to test these predictions in more than just a few systems. We urge evolutionary biologists to pay closer attention to conservation‐oriented studies, which are rapidly filling these knowledge gaps and presenting opportunities to better understand the true role of nonbreeding divergence in avian diversification. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, GENETICS)
    Ralph, P (Ed.)
    Abstract Detecting introgression between closely related populations or species is a fundamental objective in evolutionary biology. Existing methods for detecting migration and inferring migration rates from population genetic data often assume a neutral model of evolution. Growing evidence of the pervasive impact of selection on large portions of the genome across diverse taxa suggests that this assumption is unrealistic in most empirical systems. Further, ignoring selection has previously been shown to negatively impact demographic inferences (e.g. of population size histories). However, the impacts of biologically realistic selection on inferences of migration remain poorly explored. Here, we simulate data under models of background selection, selective sweeps, balancing selection, and adaptive introgression. We show that ignoring selection sometimes leads to false inferences of migration in popularly used methods that rely on the site frequency spectrum. Specifically, balancing selection and some models of background selection result in the rejection of isolation-only models in favor of isolation-with-migration models and lead to elevated estimates of migration rates. BPP, a method that analyzes sequence data directly, showed false positives for all conditions at recent divergence times, but balancing selection also led to false positives at medium-divergence times. Our results suggest that such methods may be unreliable in some empirical systems, such that new methods that are robust to selection need to be developed. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; (, Molecular Ecology)
    ABSTRACT Adaptive radiations are rich laboratories for exploring, testing, and understanding key theories in evolution and ecology because they offer spectacular displays of speciation and ecological adaptation. Particular challenges to the study of adaptive radiation include high levels of species richness, rapid speciation, and gene flow between species. Over the last decade, high‐throughput sequencing technologies and access to population genomic data have lessened these challenges by enabling the analysis of samples from many individual organisms at whole‐genome scales. Here we review how population genomic data have facilitated our knowledge of adaptive radiation in five key areas: (1) phylogenetics, (2) hybridization, (3) timing and rates of diversification, (4) the genomic basis of trait evolution, and (5) the role of genome structure in divergence. We review current knowledge in each area, highlight outstanding questions, and focus on methods that facilitate detection of complex patterns in the divergence and demography of populations through time. It is clear that population genomic data are revolutionising the ability to reconstruct evolutionary history in rapidly diversifying clades. Additionally, studies are increasingly emphasising the central role of gene flow, re‐use of standing genetic variation during adaptation, and structural genomic elements as facilitators of the speciation process in adaptive radiations. We highlight hybridization—and the hypothesized processes by which it shapes diversification—and questions seeking to bridge the divide between microevolutionary and macroevolutionary processes as rich areas for future study. Overall, access to population genomic data has facilitated an exciting era in adaptive radiation research, with implications for deeper understanding of fundamental evolutionary processes across the tree of life. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, Evolution Letters)
    Abstract The diversification of many lineages throughout natural history has frequently been associated with evolutionary changes in life cycle complexity. However, our understanding of the processes that facilitate differentiation in the morphologies and functions expressed by organisms throughout their life cycles is limited. Theory suggests that the expression of traits is decoupled across life stages, thus allowing for their evolutionary independence. Although trait decoupling between stages is well established, explanations of how said decoupling evolves have seldom been considered. Because the different phenotypes expressed by organisms throughout their life cycles are coded for by the same genome, trait decoupling must be mediated through divergence in gene expression between stages. Gene duplication has been identified as an important mechanism that enables divergence in gene function and expression between cells and tissues. Because stage transitions across life cycles require changes in tissue types and functions, we investigated the potential link between gene duplication and expression divergence between life stages. To explore this idea, we examined the temporal changes in gene expression across the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) metamorphosis. We found that within homologous groups, more phylogenetically diverged genes exhibited more distinct temporal expression patterns. This relationship scaled such that more phylogenetically diverse homologous groups showed more diverse patterns of gene expression. Furthermore, we found that duplicate genes showed increased stage-specificity relative to singleton genes. Overall, our findings suggest an important link between gene duplication and the evolution of complex life cycles. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email