More Like this

1. Board 321: Integrating Design Thinking and Digital Fabrication into Engineering Technology Education through Interdisciplinary Professional Learning

   Russell, C. (June 2023, ASEE annual conference exposition proceedings)

   In Northern Virginia, engineering technology career pathways are underdeveloped. Rapid changes in industrial processes have led to an increased need for adaptable and flexible workers who can respond creatively to shifting production technologies (Agarwal et al., 2018). In particular, workers with expertise in design thinking, communication, and critical thinking skills are in high demand (Giffi et al., 2018). Despite high wages created by this demand, engineering technology careers are largely invisible to students and the belief that manufacturing is low-tech persists (Giffi et al., 2017; Magnolia Consulting, 2022). These conditions suggest that investment in teacher professional learning (PL) is warranted. The integration of digital fabrication (e.g., 3D printing) into classroom teaching is one promising avenue to increase student interest and awareness of engineering technology careers (Peppler et al., 2016). However, studies of classroom implementation of digital fabrication technologies also report that teachers struggle to move beyond “keychain syndrome” – the tendency to fall back to reproducing simple objects, such as a keychain (Blikstein, 2014; Eisenberg, 2013). Educator PL in digital fabrication has centered on machine operation, and not the pedagogy, cognitive strategies, and processes to situate the technology (Smith et al., 2015). This project investigates the effectiveness of a sustained and interdisciplinary design thinking PL fellowship (“Makers By Design”) in improving integration of fabrication and design thinking into teaching practice. Design thinking is a non-linear user-centered strategy used to approach the design of products, emphasizing collaborative project-based methods to solve real-life problems (Brown, 2008). In the classroom, design thinking can serve as a cognitive bridge between a design problem and digital fabrication technologies. Participating Makers By Design fellows (n=17) completed 1) a series of design thinking workshops, 2) practice teaching at digital fabrication summer camps, and 3) development and integration of a design thinking challenge. Fellows completed the above in interdisciplinary groups consisting of K-12 teachers, college faculty, and librarians. Using a mixed-methods approach, this paper evaluates the extent to which participating educators reported increased confidence in integrating design thinking and digital fabrication into their instruction, demonstrated content mastery during teaching practice, and successfully developed and deployed design challenges. Data sources include pre- and post-surveys, focus groups within teaching discipline, and observations of summer camp and classroom teaching. Project results are aligned with the existing literature on successful PL (e.g., Capps et al., 2012) and recommendations for future digital fabrication-centered PL are discussed. 

   more » « less
2. The Role of Whole-Class Conversations in Supporting Early Elementary Students’ Engineering Design Sense-Making

   Wendell, K; Andrews, C; Watkins, J; Malinowski, M (July 2023, Computersupported collaborative learning)

   We consider how intentionally planned and facilitated whole-class conversations can “make space” for students’ sense-making about engineering problems and solutions and position them with epistemic authority to contribute to collective thinking. We conducted a case study on a first-grade engineering lesson that included whole-class Idea Generation and Design Synthesis Talks. We found students sense-making as they refined their design proposals and analyses in light of classmates’ contributions to the whole-class conversations. 

   more » « less
3. Using computational thinking for data practices in high school science.

   Peters-Burton, E. E.; Rich, P.; Cleary, T.; Burton, S.; Kitsantas, A.; Egan, G.; Ellsworth, J. (February 2020, The science teacher)

   When conducting a science investigation in biology, chemistry, physics or earth science, students often need to obtain, organize, clean, and analyze the data in order to draw conclusions about a particular phenomenon. It can be difficult to develop lesson plans that provide detailed or explicit instructions about what students need to think about and do to develop a firm conceptual understanding, particularly regarding data analysis. This article demonstrates how computational thinking principles and data practices can be merged to develop more effective science investigation lesson plans. The data practices of creating, collecting, manipulating, visualizing, and analyzing data are merged with the computational thinking practices of decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, algorithmic thinking, and automation to create questions for teachers and students that help them think through the underlying processes that happen with data during high school science investigations. The questions can either be used to elaborate lesson plans or embedded into lesson plans for students to consider how they are using computational thinking during their data practices in science. 

   more » « less
4. Work in Progress: Creation of a Macroethics Case Study Integrated into an Aerospace Systems Design Course

   Olson, Sabrina; Jia-Richards, Oliver; Johnson, Aaron W (June 2025, American Society for Engineering Education)

   Ethics and social responsibility education within aerospace engineering remains limited, with education on the subject often disconnected from technical course content and led by guest lecturers. While still valuable, this approach inadvertently signals to students that such topics are an addendum to their work as engineers, and reinforces the misconception of engineering as an apolitical field. Furthermore, existing ethical discussions place focus on the microethical realm, examining the ethical implications of individual decisions within the profession. This microethical focus, while important, overlooks the wider impact of engineering technologies on society. Contrastingly, macroethics addresses the collective social responsibility of the engineering field, emphasizing the ethical concerns of engineering technology. However, the abstract and qualitative nature of these macroethical concepts often conflicts with the more quantitative content of technical engineering classes, complicating efforts to integrate them into engineering coursework. This work-in-progress paper presents an example of how macroethical concepts can be embedded into traditional technical classes to foster student awareness of their ethical responsibilities as future engineers. An in-class macroethics activity and follow-up assignment were implemented in an aerospace engineering capstone design course at the University of Michigan. In the in-class activity, the technical concept of spaceports, or facilities designed for spacecraft launch, and the macroethical concepts of rightsholder analysis were specifically selected to complement the course topic of spacecraft systems design. As such, the course structure was designed to present macroethical considerations as equivalent to other systems design requirements. The in-class activity encompassed a full course period and was both developed and presented by the course instructor, with the follow-up assignment appearing in the final student group reports. The aim of the in-class activity was to increase student awareness of macroethical effects, asking the broader question of who/what is impacted when an engineering decision is made. To this end, activities of rightsholder identification and power-impact mapping were implemented, along with small-group and full-class dialogue. Students were asked to select a location for a spaceport within their university’s host state, consider the impact of their choice by identifying the rightsholders affected, and compare and contrast the differences in power and impact of these affected parties. Following the lesson, students repeated this process as part of their final course project, considering the social impacts as part of their space system design process. The instructor's experience of developing and implementing the in-class macroethics lesson and activities is examined within this paper, with focus placed on the decisions made within course structuring and lesson planning to present macroethical content as equivalent in importance to technical content. Discussion of learning goals and pedagogy will be shared with aims to identify key aspects of the macroethics lesson that may be implemented in other courses. Future work by the authors will seek to further develop this core set of facilitation goals, and integrate student data into evaluating effectiveness of the lesson in developing students’ macroethical awareness. 

   more » « less
5. Toward a Theoretical Framework for Data Fluency Teaching and Learning in Middle School STEM

   Wong, N; Elsayed, R; Perez, LR; Daehler, KR; Chen, P (March 2024, Ninety-seventh annual international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST))

   This paper presents findings from a qualitative study of eleven experienced STEM educators who worked alongside developers to design and implement data-rich lessons in their grades 6–9 mathematics and science classrooms. In the context of a project that seeks to develop professional learning for data fluency, researchers documented the co-development process to articulate a model of what teachers need to know and be able to do in order to support their students’ data fluency. The project team distilled key findings into two framing documents: 1) a description of high-leverage areas of focus for PL which highlight challenges faced by teachers, which are common, important for data fluency, and represent opportunities for supporting teacher and student growth; and 2) a logic model that describes how the PL course under development is expected to influence teacher, classroom, and student outcomes. This paper contributes to the larger education community by defining the professional learning needs of educators who wish to integrate data into their STEM classrooms. These frameworks provide designers and researchers with touchpoints to structure and study PL experiences, lesson materials, and other classroom resources for both new and veteran educators. These tools can provide STEM teachers with guidance for reflecting on their current knowledge, skills, beliefs, and teaching practices that help their students become more data fluent. 

   more » « less