An official website of the United States government
IntroductionChronic lung infection due to bacterial biofilms is one of the leading causes of mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Among many species colonizing the lung airways,Pseudomonas aeruginosaandStaphylococcus aureusare two virulent pathogens involved in mechanically robust biofilms that are difficult to eradicate using airway clearance techniques like lung lavage. To remove such biological materials, glycoside hydrolase-based compounds are commonly employed for targeting and breaking down the biofilm matrix, and subsequently increasing cell susceptibility to antibiotics. Materials and methodsIn this study, we evaluate the effects of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) and Cysteamine (CYST) in disrupting interfacial bacterial films, targeting different components of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). We characterize the mechanics and structural integrity of the interfacial bacterial films using pendant drop elastometry and scanning electron microscopy. Results and discussionOur results show that the film architectures are compromised by treatment with disrupting agents for 6 h, which reduces film elasticity significantly. These effects are profound in the wild type and mucoidP. aeruginosa, compared toS. aureus. We further assess the effects of competition and cooperation betweenS. aureusandP. aeruginosaon the mechanics of composite interfacial films. Films ofS. aureusand wild-typeP. aeruginosacocultures lose mechanical strength while those ofS. aureusand mucoidP. aeruginosaexhibit improved storage modulus. Treatment with NAC and CYST reduces the elastic property of both composite films, owing to the drugs’ ability to disintegrate their EPS matrix. Overall, our results provide new insights into methods for assessing the efficacy of mucolytic agents against interfacial biofilms relevant to cystic fibrosis infection.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on February 21, 2026
Non-disruptive matrix turnover is a conserved feature of biofilm aggregate growth in paradigm pathogenic species
ABSTRACT Bacteria form multicellular aggregates called biofilms. A crucial component of these aggregates is a protective matrix that holds the community together. Biofilm matrix composition varies depending upon bacterial species but typically includes exopolysaccharides (EPS), proteins, and extracellular DNA.Pseudomonas aeruginosais a model organism for the study of biofilms, and in non-mucoid biofilms, it uses the structurally distinct EPS Psl and Pel, the EPS-binding protein CdrA, and eDNA as key matrix components. An interesting phenomenon that we and others have observed is that the periphery of a biofilm aggregate can be EPS-rich and contain very few cells. In this study, we investigated two possible models of assembly and dynamics of this EPS-rich peripheral region: (i) newly synthesized EPS is inserted and incorporated into the existing EPS-rich region at the periphery during biofilm aggregate growth or (ii) EPS is continuously turned over and newly synthesized EPS is deposited at the outermost edge of the aggregate. Our results support the latter model. Specifically, we observed that new EPS is continually deposited at the aggregate periphery, which is necessary for continued aggregate growth but not aggregate stability. We made similar observations in another paradigm biofilm-forming species,Vibrio cholerae. This pattern of deposition raises the question of how EPS is retained. Specifically, forP. aeruginosabiofilms, the matrix adhesin CdrA is thought to retain EPS. However, current thinking is that cell-associated CdrA is responsible for this retention, and it is not clear how CdrA might function in the relatively cell-free aggregate periphery. We observed that CdrA is enzymatically degraded during aggregate growth without negatively impacting biofilm stability and that cell-free CdrA can partially maintain aggregation and Psl retention. Overall, this study shows that the matrix ofP. aeruginosabiofilms undergoes both continuous synthesis of matrix material and matrix turnover to accommodate biofilm aggregate growth and that cell-free matrix can at least partially maintain biofilm aggregation and EPS localization. Furthermore, our similar observations forV. choleraebiofilms suggest that our findings may represent basic principles of aggregate assembly in bacteria. IMPORTANCEHere, we show that, to accommodate growing cellular biomass, newly produced Psl is deposited over existing Psl at the periphery of biofilm aggregates. We demonstrated thatV. choleraeemploys a similar mechanism with its biofilm matrix EPS, VPS. In addition, we found that the protease LasB is present in the biofilm matrix, resulting in degradation of CdrA to lower molecular weight cell-free forms. We then show that the released forms of CdrA are retained in the matrix and remain functional. Together, our findings support that theP. aeruginosabiofilm matrix is dynamic during the course of aggregate growth and that other species may employ similar mechanisms to remodel their matrix.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2205006
- PAR ID:
- 10655241
- Editor(s):
- Whiteley, Marvin
- Publisher / Repository:
- mBio
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- mBio
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 2150-7511
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Biofilms are aggregates of bacterial cells surrounded by an extracellular matrix. Much progress has been made in studying biofilm growth on solid substrates; however, little is known about the biophysical mechanisms underlying biofilm development in three-dimensional confined environments in which the biofilm-dwelling cells must push against and even damage the surrounding environment to proliferate. Here, combining single-cell imaging, mutagenesis, and rheological measurement, we reveal the key morphogenesis steps ofVibrio choleraebiofilms embedded in hydrogels as they grow by four orders of magnitude from their initial size. We show that the morphodynamics and cell ordering in embedded biofilms are fundamentally different from those of biofilms on flat surfaces. Treating embedded biofilms as inclusions growing in an elastic medium, we quantitatively show that the stiffness contrast between the biofilm and its environment determines biofilm morphology and internal architecture, selecting between spherical biofilms with no cell ordering and oblate ellipsoidal biofilms with high cell ordering. When embedded in stiff gels, cells self-organize into a bipolar structure that resembles the molecular ordering in nematic liquid crystal droplets. In vitro biomechanical analysis shows that cell ordering arises from stress transmission across the biofilm–environment interface, mediated by specific matrix components. Our imaging technique and theoretical approach are generalizable to other biofilm-forming species and potentially to biofilms embedded in mucus or host tissues as during infection. Our results open an avenue to understand how confined cell communities grow by means of a compromise between their inherent developmental program and the mechanical constraints imposed by the environment.more » « less
-
Abstract A new technique was used to measure the viscoelasticity of in vivoPseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms. This was done through ex vivo microrheology measurements of in vivo biofilms excised from mouse wound beds. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the mechanics of in vivo biofilms have been measured. In vivo results are then compared to typical in vitro measurements. Biofilms grown in vivo are more relatively elastic than those grown in a wound-like medium in vitro but exhibited similar compliance. Using various genetically mutatedP. aeruginosastrains, it is observed that the contributions of the exopolysaccharides Pel, Psl, and alginate to biofilm viscoelasticity were different for the biofilms grown in vitro and in vivo. In vitro experiments with collagen containing medium suggest this likely arises from the incorporation of host material, most notably collagen, into the matrix of the biofilm when it is grown in vivo. Taken together with earlier studies that examined the in vitro effects of collagen on mechanical properties, we conclude that collagen may, in some cases, be the dominant contributor to biofilm viscoelasticity in vivo.more » « less
-
Abstract Biofilms are ubiquitous surface-associated bacterial communities embedded in an extracellular matrix. It is commonly assumed that biofilm cells are glued together by the matrix; however, how the specific biochemistry of matrix components affects the cell-matrix interactions and how these interactions vary during biofilm growth remain unclear. Here, we investigate cell-matrix interactions inVibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera. We combine genetics, microscopy, simulations, and biochemical analyses to show thatV. choleraecells are not attracted to the main matrix component (Vibriopolysaccharide, VPS), but can be attached to each other and to the VPS network through surface-associated VPS and crosslinks formed by the protein Bap1. Downregulation of VPS production and surface trimming by the polysaccharide lyase RbmB cause surface remodeling as biofilms age, shifting the nature of cell-matrix interactions from attractive to repulsive and facilitating cell dispersal as aggregated groups. Our results shed light on the dynamics of diverse cell-matrix interactions as drivers of biofilm development.more » « less
-
Biofilm formation, including adherence to surfaces and secretion of extracellular matrix, is common in the microbial world, but we often do not know how interaction at the cellular spatial scale translates to higher-order biofilm community ecology. Here we explore an especially understudied element of biofilm ecology, namely predation by the bacteriumBdellovibrio bacteriovorus. This predator can kill and consume many different Gram-negative bacteria, includingVibrio choleraeandEscherichia coli.V. choleraecan protect itself from predation within densely packed biofilm structures that it creates, whereasE. colibiofilms are highly susceptible toB. bacteriovorus. We explore how predator–prey dynamics change whenV. choleraeandE. coliare growing in biofilms together. We find that in dual-species prey biofilms,E. colisurvival underB. bacteriovoruspredation increases, whereasV. choleraesurvival decreases.E. colibenefits from predator protection when it becomes embedded within expanding groups of highly packedV. cholerae. But we also find that the ordered, highly packed, and clonal biofilm structure ofV. choleraecan be disrupted ifV. choleraecells are directly adjacent toE. colicells at the start of biofilm growth. When this occurs, the two species become intermixed, and the resulting disordered cell groups do not block predator entry. Because biofilm cell group structure depends on initial cell distributions at the start of prey biofilm growth, the surface colonization dynamics have a dramatic impact on the eventual multispecies biofilm architecture, which in turn determines to what extent both species survive exposure toB. bacteriovorus.more » « less
