An official website of the United States government
Prior work has shown that embodiment can benefit virtual agents, such as increasing rapport and conveying non-verbal information. However, it is unclear if users prefer an embodied to a speech-only agent for augmented reality (AR) headsets that are designed to assist users in completing real-world tasks. We conducted a study to examine users' perceptions and behaviors when interacting with virtual agents in AR. We asked 24 adults to wear the Microsoft HoloLens and find objects in a hidden object game while interacting with an agent that would offer assistance. We presented participants with four different agents: voice-only, non-human, full-size embodied, and a miniature embodied agent. Overall, users preferred the miniature embodied agent due to the novelty of his size and reduced uncanniness as opposed to the larger agent. From our results, we draw conclusions about how agent representation matters and derive guidelines on designing agents for AR headsets.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on May 15, 2026
Exploring Users’ Perceptions on Position, Gaze Direction, and Gender of Virtual Agents in Augmented Reality
Prior research has highlighted users’ preferences for embodiment when interacting with virtual agents in augmented reality headsets. However, open questions remain regarding users’ preferences towards agent placement and gaze direction. In our study, we asked 48 adults to wear the Microsoft HoloLens 2 and find objects in a hidden object game with the help of embodied agents. We examined four distinct agent configurations for both male and female agents: a human-size agent standing beside participants, a human-size agent sitting beside participants, a small desk agent facing the screen, and a small desk agent facing the participant. Overall, participants preferred male over female virtual agents when receiving assistance, and no consistent preference emerged regarding the agents’ position or gaze direction. From our results, we build upon existing guidelines for designing better virtual agents for AR with headsets.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1750840
- PAR ID:
- 10657384
- Publisher / Repository:
- In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2025
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Motivational agents are virtual agents that seek to motivate users by providing feedback and guidance. Prior work has shown how certain factors of an agent, such as the type of feedback given or the agent’s appearance, can influence user motivation when completing tasks. However, it is not known how nonverbal mirroring affects an agent’s ability to motivate users. Specifically, would an agent that mirrors be more motivating than an agent that does not? Would an agent trained on real human behaviors be better? We conducted a within-subjects study asking 30 participants to play a “find-the-hidden-object” game while interacting with a motivational agent that would provide hints and feedback on the user’s performance. We created three agents: a Control agent that did not respond to the user’s movements, a simple Mimic agent that mirrored the user’s movements on a delay, and a Complex agent that used a machine-learned behavior model. We asked participants to complete a questionnaire asking them to rate their levels of motivation and perceptions of the agent and its feedback. Our results showed that the Mimic agent was more motivating than the Control agent and more helpful than the Complex agent. We also found that when participants became aware of the mimicking behavior, it can feel weird or creepy; therefore, it is important to consider the detection of mimicry when designing virtual agents.more » « less
-
An overarching goal of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is creating autonomous, social agents that help people. Two important challenges, though, are that different people prefer different assistance from agents and that preferences can change over time. Thus, helping behaviors should be tailored to how an individual feels during the interaction. We hypothesize that human nonverbal behavior can give clues about users' preferences for an agent's helping behaviors, augmenting an agent's ability to computationally predict such preferences with machine learning models. To investigate our hypothesis, we collected data from 194 participants via an online survey in which participants were recorded while playing a multiplayer game. We evaluated whether the inclusion of nonverbal human signals, as well as additional context (e.g., via game or personality information), led to improved prediction of user preferences between agent behaviors compared to explicitly provided survey responses. Our results suggest that nonverbal communication -- a common type of human implicit feedback -- can aid in understanding how people want computational agents to interact with them.more » « less
-
Explanations of AI Agents' actions are considered to be an important factor in improving users' trust in the decisions made by autonomous AI systems. However, as these autonomous systems evolve from reactive, i.e., acting on user input, to proactive, i.e., acting without requiring user intervention, there is a need to explore how the explanation for the actions of these agents should evolve. In this work, we explore the design of explanations through participatory design methods for a proactive auto-response messaging agent that can reduce perceived obligations and social pressure to respond quickly to incoming messages by providing unavailability-related context. We recruited 14 participants who worked in pairs during collaborative design sessions where they reasoned about the agent's design and actions. We qualitatively analyzed the data collected through these sessions and found that participants' reasoning about agent actions led them to speculate heavily on its design. These speculations significantly influenced participants' desire for explanations and the controls they sought to inform the agents' behavior. Our findings indicate a need to transform users' speculations into accurate mental models of agent design. Further, since the agent acts as a mediator in human-human communication, it is also necessary to account for social norms in its explanation design. Finally, user expertise in understanding their habits and behaviors allows the agent to learn from the user their preferences when justifying its actions.more » « less
-
Extended reality (XR) technologies, such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), provide users, their avatars, and embodied agents a shared platform to collaborate in a spatial context. Although traditional face-to-face communication is limited by users’ proximity, meaning that another human’s non-verbal embodied cues become more difficult to perceive the farther one is away from that person, researchers and practitioners have started to look into ways to accentuate or amplify such embodied cues and signals to counteract the effects of distance with XR technologies. In this article, we describe and evaluate the Big Head technique, in which a human’s head in VR/AR is scaled up relative to their distance from the observer as a mechanism for enhancing the visibility of non-verbal facial cues, such as facial expressions or eye gaze. To better understand and explore this technique, we present two complimentary human-subject experiments in this article. In our first experiment, we conducted a VR study with a head-mounted display to understand the impact of increased or decreased head scales on participants’ ability to perceive facial expressions as well as their sense of comfort and feeling of “uncannniness” over distances of up to 10 m. We explored two different scaling methods and compared perceptual thresholds and user preferences. Our second experiment was performed in an outdoor AR environment with an optical see-through head-mounted display. Participants were asked to estimate facial expressions and eye gaze, and identify a virtual human over large distances of 30, 60, and 90 m. In both experiments, our results show significant differences in minimum, maximum, and ideal head scales for different distances and tasks related to perceiving faces, facial expressions, and eye gaze, and we also found that participants were more comfortable with slightly bigger heads at larger distances. We discuss our findings with respect to the technologies used, and we discuss implications and guidelines for practical applications that aim to leverage XR-enhanced facial cues.more » « less
