An official website of the United States government
Abstract: Common features in sign languages that have no history of contact present a puzzle. The current article brings together findings from three studies of Lengua de Señas Nicaragüense (LSN) to identify processes that underpin the inception and changes in language as it emerges. We use an apparent time approach to capture language change in three domains: pointing and deixis, nonmanual markers with Wh-questions, and spatial differentiation for locatives and arguments. By comparing the language of Nicaraguan homesigners, three successive cohorts of LSN signers, and the signing of hearing children of deaf LSN signers (Codas), we propose that language change is characterized by two complementary processes, in balance: emergence and convergence. Emergence is the constructive process by which forms arise, such as new lexical items, new patterns of word order, and new mappings between forms and functions, such as a pointing sign taking on a pronominal function (study 1). We argue that vertical transmission from a more experienced user to a less experienced learner drives emergence, often via linguistic reanalysis in which the learner assigns a different function to a form than the one used in the grammar of the experienced user. Complementing the process of emergence, convergence is the reductive process by which competing forms and structures are condensed to a smaller set to achieve parity across a group of language users, a process exemplified by the selection of the brow furrow and head tilt to accompany Wh-questions (study 2). We argue that horizontal peer interactions are key to convergence processes; the language of learners who do not experience such peer interactions, such as homesigners and Codas, shows less convergence (study 3). Taken together, these studies illustrate how the developmental characteristics of the learner intersect with the characteristics of their language (internal ecology), environments, and interactions (external ecology) to drive the processes of language change. We conclude that both vertical transmission and horizontal peer interactions are key to the emergence of new languages, enabling the mechanisms responsible for the typological similarities observed across unrelated languages.
more »
« less
Who did what to whom? Marking event participants in Nicaraguan homesign systems
Two strong hypotheses bridge between typological studies of the frequency of different marking patterns and psychological studies of how these patterns are acquired. The word-order hypothesis proposes that order is a cognitively-salient cue, available to children before linguistic cues and thus appears early in language emergence. The agent-first hypothesis proposes that agents hold a privileged role in event representations and shape emerging languages. A recent study of Lengua de Señas Nicaragüense (LSN) found no preference for consistent or agent-initial word order. Instead LSN-signers used other linguistic devices. We looked at homesigners, each representing a different origin point for language emergence. We found no support for the agent-first hypothesis: most homesigners produced more patient-initial responses than agent-initial responses. We found no support for the word-order hypothesis: only one homesigner produced the same order on more than half the trials. Instead homesigners used a variety of other devices for marking participant roles.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2116180
- PAR ID:
- 10663214
- Date Published:
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Lengua de Señas Nicaragüense Homesign Agent Patient Word order Event participants
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Boston, MA
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Language plays a large role in our lives and influences many mental processes. But does every mental process require language? This dissertation investigates how language experience influences the development of thematic roles and pragmatic knowledge, specifically looking at deaf homesigners who have limited to no exposure to spoken or signed language and innovate their own homesign language systems in order to communicate with the people around them. I address methodological questions such as Will these novel tasks work with homesigners? as well as theoretical questions such as Is language required to develop concepts of agents and patients? and Can pragmatic knowledge exist without exposure to typical discourse? I used novel tasks (i.e., referential communication pragmatics tasks and an eye tracking paradigm) in order to investigate homesigners’ pragmatic knowledge and event representation. I found that homesigners will often use pragmatic knowledge and produce necessary relevant information (e.g., modifiers with nouns, or agents and patients with actions). Regarding event representation, homesigners did not appear to use systematic conventionalized strategies (e.g., word order, use of space) to distinguish between agents and patients, although I did observe some preliminary strategies. I also did not find evidence that homesigners used nonlinguistic agent-patient concepts on the eye tracking task. The findings of this dissertation suggest that basic pragmatic knowledge may not require full access to language, but concepts of agent and patient may require more language to fully develop than previously expected. In the absence of early language exposure, lifelong communicative experience may help homesigners to develop pragmatic skills, which then might guide later linguistic structure formation.more » « less
-
Sandler, W.; Aronoff, M.; Padden C. (Ed.)Variation in the linguistic use of handshapes exists across sign languages, but it is unclear how these iconic handshape preferences arise and become conventionalized. In order to understand the factors that shape such handshape preferences in the earliest stages of language emergence, we examined communication within family homesign systems. Homesigners are deaf individuals who have not acquired a signed or spoken language and who innovate unique gesture systems to communicate with hearing friends and family (“communication partners”). We analyzed how characteristics of participants and stimulus items influence handshape preferences and conventionalization. Participants included 11 deaf homesigners, 24 hearing communication partners (CPs), and 8 hearing non-signing adults from Nicaragua. Participants were asked to label items using gestures or signs.more » « less
-
Sandler, W.; Aronoff, M.; Padden, C. (Ed.)Variation in the linguistic use of handshapes exists across sign languages, but it is unclear how these iconic handshape preferences arise and become conventionalized. In order to understand the factors that shape such handshape preferences in the earliest stages of language emergence, we examined communication within family homesign systems. Homesigners are deaf individuals who have not acquired a signed or spoken language and who innovate unique gesture systems to communicate with hearing friends and family (“communication partners”). We analyzed how characteristics of participants and stimulus items influence handshape preferences and conventionalization. Participants included 11 deaf homesigners, 24 hearing communication partners (CPs), and 8 hearing non-signing adults from Nicaragua. Participants were asked to label items using gestures or signs. The handshape type (Handling, Object, or combined Handling+Object) was then coded. The participants and groups showed variability in iconic handshape preferences. Adult homesigners’ families demonstrated more conventionalization than did child homesigners’ families. Adult homesigners also used a combined Handling + Object form more than other participants. Younger CPs and those with fewer years of experience using a homesign system showed greater conventionalization. Items that elicited a reliable handshape preference were more likely to elicit Handling rather than Object handshapes. These findings suggest that similarity in terms of handshape type varies even within families, including hearing gesturers in the same culture. Although adult homesigners’ families were more conventionalized than child homesigners’ families, full conventionalization of these handshape preferences do not seem to appear reliably within two to three decades of use in a family when only one deaf homesigner uses it as a primary system.more » « less
-
One structural dimension that varies across languages is the simultaneous or sequential expression of meaning. Complex predicates can layer meanings together simultaneously in a single-verb predicate (SVP) or distribute them sequentially in a multiple-verb predicate (MVP). We ask whether typological variability in this dimension might be a consequence of systematic patterns of diachronic change. We examine the distribution of markers of agency and number within the verb phrase (the predicate) in the earliest stages of a young, emerging sign language in Nicaragua, Lengua de Señas Nicaragüense (LSN), beginning with homesign systems like those from which LSN originated, and progressing through two decades of transmission to new learners. We find that: (i) LSN2 signers are more likely to produce MVPs than homesigners or LSN1 signers; (ii) in the MVPs they do produce, homesigners and LSN1 signers are more likely to produce predicates that mark both agency and number simultaneously on at least one of the verbs; LSN2 signers are just as likely to produce sequences with verbs that mark agency and number in sequentially separate verbs. We discuss how language acquisition, modality, and structure, as well as specific social factors associated with each of the groups, play a role in driving these changes, and how, over time, these patterns of change might yield the diversity of forms observed across spoken and signed languages today.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
