skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Evolutionary Reasoning Does Not Arise in Standard Usage of Protein Language Models
Abstract Protein language models (PLMs) are often assumed to capture evolutionary information by training on large protein sequence datasets. Yet it remains unclear whether PLMs can reason about evolution—that is, infer evolutionary relationships between sequences. We test this capability by evaluating whether standard PLM usage, frozen or fine-tuned embeddings with distance-based comparison, supports evolutionary reasoning. Existing PLMs consistently fail to recover phylogenetic structure, despite strong performance on sequence-level tasks such as masked-token and contact prediction. We present Phyla, a hybrid state-space and transformer model that jointly processes multiple sequences and is trained using a tree-based objective across 3,000 phylogenies spanning diverse protein families. Phylaoutperforms the next-best PLM by 9% on tree reconstruction and 23% on taxonomic clustering while remaining alignment- and guide-tree-free. Although classical alignment pipelines achieve higher absolute accuracy, Phylanarrows the gap and achieves markedly lower end-to-end runtime. Applied to real data, Phylareconstructs biologically accurate clades in the tree of life and resolves genome-scale relationships amongMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates. These findings suggest that, under standard usage, evolutionary reasoning does not reliably emerge from large-scale sequence modeling. Instead, Phylashows that models trained with phylogenetic supervision can reason about evolution more effectively, offering a biologically grounded path toward evolutionary foundation models.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2339524
PAR ID:
10672498
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
NeurIPS
Date Published:
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Protein language models (PLMs) are often assumed to capture evolutionary information by training on large protein sequence datasets. Yet it remains unclear whether PLMs can reason about evolution—that is, infer evolutionary relationships between sequences. We test this capability by evaluating whether standard PLM usage, frozen or fine-tuned embeddings with distance-based comparison, supports evolutionary reasoning. Existing PLMs consistently fail to recover phylogenetic structure, despite strong performance on sequence-level tasks such as masked-token and contact prediction. We present PHYLA, a hybrid state-space and transformer model that jointly processes multiple sequences and is trained using a tree-based objective across 3,000 phylogenies spanning diverse protein families. PHYLA outperforms the next-best PLM by 9% on tree reconstruction and 23% on taxonomic clustering while remaining alignment- and guide-tree-free. Although classical alignment pipelines achieve higher absolute accuracy, PHYLA narrows the gap and achieves markedly lower end-to-end runtime. Applied to real data, PHYLA reconstructs biologically accurate clades in the tree of life and resolves genome-scale relationships among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. These findings suggest that, under standard usage, evolutionary reasoning does not reliably emerge from large-scale sequence modeling. Instead, PHYLA shows that models trained with phylogenetic supervision can reason about evolution more effectively, offering a biologically grounded path toward evolutionary foundation models. 
    more » « less
  2. Accurate detection of protein sequence homology is essential for understanding evolutionary relationships and predicting protein functions, particularly for detecting remote homology in the “twilight zone” (20-35% sequence similarity), where traditional sequence alignment methods often fail. Recent studies show that embeddings from protein language models (pLM) can improve remote homology detection over traditional methods. Alignment-based approaches, such as those combining pLMs with dynamic programming alignment, further improve performance but often suffer from noise in the resulting similarity matrices. To address this, we evaluate a newly developed embedding-based sequence alignment approach that refines residue-level embedding similarity using K-means clustering and double dynamic programming (DDP). We show that the incorporation of clustering and DDP contributes substantially to the improved performance in detecting remote homology. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms both traditional and state-of-the-art approaches based on pLMs on several benchmarks. Our study illustrates embedding-based alignment refined with clustering and DDP offers a powerful approach for identifying remote homology, with potential to evolve further as pLMs continue to advance. 
    more » « less
  3. Protein language models (pLMs) have emerged as potent tools for predicting and designing protein structure and function, and the degree to which these models fundamentally understand the inherent biophysics of protein structure stands as an open question. Motivated by a finding that pLM-based structure predictors erroneously predict nonphysical structures for protein isoforms, we investigated the nature of sequence context needed for contact predictions in the pLM Evolutionary Scale Modeling (ESM-2). We demonstrate by use of a “categorical Jacobian” calculation that ESM-2 stores statistics of coevolving residues, analogously to simpler modeling approaches like Markov Random Fields and Multivariate Gaussian models. We further investigated how ESM-2 “stores” information needed to predict contacts by comparing sequence masking strategies, and found that providing local windows of sequence information allowed ESM-2 to best recover predicted contacts. This suggests that pLMs predict contacts by storing motifs of pairwise contacts. Our investigation highlights the limitations of current pLMs and underscores the importance of understanding the underlying mechanisms of these models. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Protein language models (pLMs) trained on a large corpus of protein sequences have shown unprecedented scalability and broad generalizability in a wide range of predictive modeling tasks, but their power has not yet been harnessed for predicting protein–nucleic acid binding sites, critical for characterizing the interactions between proteins and nucleic acids. Here, we present EquiPNAS, a new pLM-informed E(3) equivariant deep graph neural network framework for improved protein–nucleic acid binding site prediction. By combining the strengths of pLM and symmetry-aware deep graph learning, EquiPNAS consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art methods for both protein–DNA and protein–RNA binding site prediction on multiple datasets across a diverse set of predictive modeling scenarios ranging from using experimental input to AlphaFold2 predictions. Our ablation study reveals that the pLM embeddings used in EquiPNAS are sufficiently powerful to dramatically reduce the dependence on the availability of evolutionary information without compromising on accuracy, and that the symmetry-aware nature of the E(3) equivariant graph-based neural architecture offers remarkable robustness and performance resilience. EquiPNAS is freely available at https://github.com/Bhattacharya-Lab/EquiPNAS. 
    more » « less
  5. dos Reis, Mario (Ed.)
    Abstract Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) uses an alignment of extant protein sequences, a phylogeny describing the history of the protein family and a model of the molecular-evolutionary process to infer the sequences of ancient proteins, allowing researchers to directly investigate the impact of sequence evolution on protein structure and function. Like all statistical inferences, ASR can be sensitive to violations of its underlying assumptions. Previous studies have shown that, whereas phylogenetic uncertainty has only a very weak impact on ASR accuracy, uncertainty in the protein sequence alignment can more strongly affect inferred ancestral sequences. Here, we show that errors in sequence alignment can produce errors in ASR across a range of realistic and simplified evolutionary scenarios. Importantly, sequence reconstruction errors can lead to errors in estimates of structural and functional properties of ancestral proteins, potentially undermining the reliability of analyses relying on ASR. We introduce an alignment-integrated ASR approach that combines information from many different sequence alignments. We show that integrating alignment uncertainty improves ASR accuracy and the accuracy of downstream structural and functional inferences, often performing as well as highly accurate structure-guided alignment. Given the growing evidence that sequence alignment errors can impact the reliability of ASR studies, we recommend that future studies incorporate approaches to mitigate the impact of alignment uncertainty. Probabilistic modeling of insertion and deletion events has the potential to radically improve ASR accuracy when the model reflects the true underlying evolutionary history, but further studies are required to thoroughly evaluate the reliability of these approaches under realistic conditions. 
    more » « less