Search for: All records

In contrast to global warming, the subpolar North Atlantic has experienced long-term cooling throughout the 20th century. This cooling, known as the North Atlantic cold blob, has been hypothesized to arise from reduced poleward oceanic heat transport associated with a slowdown of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC). Here, by diagnosing historical simulations from multiple coupled climate models, we find that ocean heat transport is not the only pathway through which the AMOC modulates sea surface temperature variability. A weakened AMOC is also associated with colder, drier lower atmospheric conditions, which lead to a reduction in surface warming expected from increasing amounts of heat-trapping gases by reducing downward clear-sky longwave radiation at the surface. This radiative pathway and the oceanic processes contribute equally to the North Atlantic cold blob. These results highlight the importance of the AMOC’s impact on atmospheric properties and their radiative effects. 

Abstract Despite global warming, the sea surface temperature (SST) in the subpolar North Atlantic has decreased since the 1900s. This local cooling, known as the North Atlantic cold blob, signifies a unique role of the subpolar North Atlantic in uptaking heat and hence impacts downstream weather and climate. However, a lack of observational records and their constraints on climate models leave the North Atlantic cold blob formation mechanism inconclusive. Using simulations from phase 6 of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, we assess the primary processes driving the North Atlantic cold blob within individual models and whether the mechanisms are consistent across models. We show that 11 out of 32 models, which we call “Cold Blob” models, simulate the subpolar North Atlantic cooling over 1900–2014. Further analyzing the heat budget of the subpolar North Atlantic SST shows that models have distinct mechanisms of cold blob formation. While 4 of the 11 Cold Blob models indicate decreased oceanic heat transport convergence (OHTC) as the key mechanism, another four models suggest changes in radiative processes making predominant contributions. The contribution of OHTC and radiative processes is comparable in the remaining three models. Such a model disagreement on the mechanism of cold blob formation may be associated with simulated base-state Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) strength, which explains 39% of the intermodel spread in the contribution of OHTC to the simulated cold blob. Models with a stronger base-state AMOC suggest a greater role of OHTC, whereas those with a weaker base-state AMOC indicate that radiative processes are more responsible. This model discrepancy suggests that the cold blob formation mechanism diagnosed from single model should be interpreted with caution. Significance StatementThe mechanisms driving sea surface temperatures over the subpolar North Atlantic to cool since the 1900s remain uncertain due to the lack of direct observations. Here, we use a temperature change decomposition framework to dissect the historical trend of surface temperature simulated in multiple global climate models. The models diverge on whether the subpolar North Atlantic cooling is induced by reduced ocean heat transport convergence or altered radiative processes. Notably, the importance of ocean heat transport convergence is influenced by the simulated base-state strength of Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and the Irminger Sea’s mixed layer depth. This finding cautions against concluding the cooling mechanism from a single model and highlights a need for ongoing observations to constrain AMOC-related climate projection in the subpolar North Atlantic. 

Abstract Accurate historical records of Earth’s surface temperatures are central to climate research and policy development. Widely-used estimates based on instrumental measurements from land and sea are, however, not fully consistent at either global or regional scales. To address these challenges, we develop the Dynamically Consistent ENsemble of Temperature (DCENT), a 200-member ensemble of monthly surface temperature anomalies relative to the 1982–2014 climatology. Each DCENT member starts from 1850 and has a 5° × 5° resolution. DCENT leverages several updated or recently-developed approaches of data homogenization and bias adjustments: an optimized pairwise homogenization algorithm for identifying breakpoints in land surface air temperature records, a physics-informed inter-comparison method to adjust systematic offsets in sea-surface temperatures recorded by ships, and a coupled energy balance model to homogenize continental and marine records. Each approach was published individually, and this paper describes a combined approach and its application in developing a gridded analysis. A notable difference of DCENT relative to existing temperature estimates is a cooler baseline for 1850–1900 that implies greater historical warming. 

ABSTRACT A spatially infilled Dynamically Consistent Ensemble of surface Temperature (DCENT‐I) has been created by infilling land‐air and sea‐surface temperatures from DCENT using ordinary kriging with anisotropic and heterogeneous kernels. By incorporating air temperature anomalies over sea‐ice areas, DCENT‐I provides spatially complete monthly temperature fields at 5° resolution from 1850 to the present (currently the end of 2024) as a 200‐member ensemble. Uncertainty estimates that account for the need to infill for missing observations are made using a Multivariate Gaussian Process, and these are consistent with estimates derived from masking climate model simulations. The use of anisotropic and heterogeneous kernels leads to a reconstruction of El Niño variability whose spatial pattern and temporal variance are generally consistent throughout the record. As compared with taking the unfilled average, infilling increases the global mean surface temperature (GMST) warming estimate over 2005–2024 relative to a 1850–1900 baseline from 1.09 [0.96, 1.18] (95% range across members) to 1.17 [1.05, 1.26]°C, largely because of infilling in rapidly warming high‐latitude regions. Compared with HadCRUT5, GISTEMP v4, NOAA Global Temp v6, and Berkeley Earth, DCENT‐I shows a steadier and slightly faster GMST warming trend, reflecting the bias‐adjustments inherited from DCENT. 

Abstract Land surface air temperatures (LSAT) inferred from weather station data differ among major research groups. The estimate by NOAA’s monthly Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCNm) averages 0.02°C cooler between 1880 and 1940 than Berkeley Earth’s and 0.14°C cooler than the Climate Research Unit estimates. Such systematic offsets can arise from differences in how poorly documented changes in measurement characteristics are detected and adjusted. Building upon an existing pairwise homogenization algorithm used in generating the fourth version of NOAA’s GHCNm(V4), PHA₀, we propose two revisions to account for autocorrelation in climate variables. One version, PHA₁, makes minimal modification to PHA₀by extending the threshold used in breakpoint detection to be a function of LSAT autocorrelation. The other version, PHA₂, uses penalized likelihood to detect breakpoints through optimizing a model-selection problem globally. To facilitate efficient optimization for series with more than 1000 time steps, a multiparent genetic algorithm is proposed for PHA₂. Tests on synthetic data generated by adding breakpoints to CMIP6 simulations and realizations from a Gaussian process indicate that PHA₁and PHA₂both similarly outperform PHA₀in recovering accurate climatic trends. Applied to unhomogenized GHCNmV4, both revised algorithms detect breakpoints that correspond with available station metadata. Uncertainties are estimated by perturbing algorithmic parameters, and an ensemble is constructed by pooling 50 PHA₁- and 50 PHA₂-based members. The continental-mean warming in this new ensemble is consistent with that of Berkeley Earth, despite using different homogenization approaches. Relative to unhomogenized data, our homogenization increases the 1880–2022 trend by 0.16 [0.12, 0.19]°C century⁻¹(95% confidence interval), leading to continental-mean warming of 1.65 [1.62, 1.69]°C over 2010–22 relative to 1880–1900. Significance StatementAccurately correcting for systematic errors in observational records of land surface air temperature (LSAT) is critical for quantifying historical warming. Existing LSAT estimates are subject to systematic offsets associated with processes including changes in instrumentation and station movement. This study improves a pairwise homogenization algorithm by accounting for the fact that climate signals are correlated over time. The revised algorithms outperform the original in identifying discontinuities and recovering accurate warming trends. Applied to monthly station temperatures, the revised algorithms adjust trends in continental mean LSAT since the 1880s to be 0.16°C century⁻¹greater relative to raw data. Our estimate is most consistent with that from Berkeley Earth and indicates lesser and greater warming than estimates from NOAA and the Met Office, respectively. 

Abstract Discrepancies in historical global mean surface temperature (GMST) estimates largely stem from differences in bias corrections applied to sea surface temperature (SST) records. Here, using the amplitude of the diurnal cycle in SST, we provide evidence that wooden‐to‐canvas bucket transitions were mostly complete by the early 1900s, earlier than commonly assumed by two decades, resulting in strong early 20th century cold biases. We then use this diurnal evidence, together with coral O and Sr/Ca proxies and expected GMST responses to external radiative forcing, to evaluate four different SST estimates: HadSST4, ERSST5, COBESST2, and DCSST. Of these, DCSST, developed by our team through adjustment of SSTs to match coastal land surface air temperatures, shows the closest overall agreement with all three lines of evidence. DCSST features a larger and steadier warming since the 1900s relative to the other estimates and indicates somewhat higher transient climate sensitivity and smaller decadal variability. 

Abstract A major uncertainty in reconstructing historical sea surface temperature (SST) before the 1990s involves correcting for systematic offsets associated with bucket and engine-room intake temperature measurements. A recent study used a linear scaling of coastal station-based air temperatures (SATs) to infer nearby SSTs, but the physics in the coupling between SATs and SSTs generally gives rise to more complex regional air–sea temperature differences. In this study, an energy-balance model (EBM) of air–sea thermal coupling is adapted for predicting near-coast SSTs from coastal SATs. The model is shown to be more skillful than linear-scaling approaches through cross-validation analyses using instrumental records after the 1960s and CMIP6 simulations between 1880 and 2020. Improved skill primarily comes from capturing features reflecting air–sea heat fluxes dominating temperature variability at high latitudes, including damping high-frequency wintertime SAT variability and reproducing the phase lag between SSTs and SATs. Inferred near-coast SSTs allow for intercalibrating coastal SAT and SST measurements at a variety of spatial scales. The 1900–40 mean offset between the latest SST estimates available from the Met Office (HadSST4) and SAT-inferred SSTs range between −1.6°C (95% confidence interval: [−1.7°, −1.4°C]) and 1.2°C ([0.8°, 1.6°C]) across 10° × 10° grids. When further averaged along the global coastline, HadSST4 is significantly colder than SAT-inferred SSTs by 0.20°C ([0.07°, 0.35°C]) over 1900–40. These results indicate that historical SATs and SSTs involve substantial inconsistencies at both regional and global scales. Major outstanding questions involve the distribution of errors between our intercalibration model and instrumental records of SAT and SST as well as the degree to which coastal intercalibrations are informative of global trends. Significance Statement To evaluate the consistency of instrumental surface temperature estimates before the 1990s, we develop a coupled energy-balance model to intercalibrate measurements of sea surface temperature (SST) and station-based air temperature (SAT) near global coasts. Our model captures geographically varying physical regimes of air–sea coupling and outperforms existing methods in inferring regional SSTs from SAT measurements. When applied to historical temperature records, the model indicates significant discrepancies between inferred and observed SSTs at both global and regional scales before the 1960s. Our findings suggest remaining data issues in historical temperature archives and opportunities for further improvements.