Search for: All records

Quantifying nitrogen uptake rates across different forest types is critical for a range of ecological questions, including the parameterization of global climate change models. However, few measurements of forest nitrogen uptake rates are available due to the intensive labor required to collect in situ data. Here, we seek to optimize data collection efforts by identifying measurements that must be made in situ and those that can be omitted or approximated from databases. We estimated nitrogen uptake rates in 18 mature monodominant forest stands comprising 13 species of diverse taxonomy at the Morton Arboretum in Lisle, IL, USA. We measured all nitrogen concentrations, foliage allocation, and fine root biomass in situ. We estimated wood biomass increments by in situ stem diameter and stem core measurements combined with allometric equations. We estimated fine root turnover rates from database values. We analyzed similar published data from monodominant forest FACE sites. At least in monodominant forests, accurate estimates of forest nitrogen uptake rates appear to require in situ measurements of fine root productivity and are appreciably better paired with in situ measurements of foliage productivity. Generally, wood productivity and tissue nitrogen concentrations may be taken from trait databases at higher taxonomic levels. Careful sorting of foliage or fine roots to species is time consuming but has little effect on estimates of nitrogen uptake rate. By directing research efforts to critical in situ measurements only, future studies can maximize research effort to identify the drivers of varied nitrogen uptake patterns across gradients. 

Mounting evidence suggests that plant–soil feedbacks (PSF) may determine plant community structure. However, we still have a poor understanding of how predictions from short‐term PSF experiments compare with outcomes of long‐term field experiments involving competing plants. We conducted a reciprocal greenhouse experiment to examine how the growth of prairie grass species depended on the soil communities cultured by conspecific or heterospecific plant species in the field. The source soil came from monocultures in a long‐term competition experiment (LTCE; Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve, MN, USA). Within the LTCE, six species of perennial prairie grasses were grown in monocultures or in eight pairwise competition plots for 12 years under conditions of low or high soil nitrogen availability. In six cases, one species clearly excluded the other; in two cases, the pair appeared to coexist. In year 15, we gathered soil from all 12 soil types (monocultures of six species by two nitrogen levels) and grew seedlings of all six species in each soil type for 7 weeks. Using biomass estimates from this greenhouse experiment, we predicted coexistence or competitive exclusion using pairwise PSFs, as derived by Bever and colleagues, and compared model predictions to observed outcomes within the LTCE. Pairwise PSFs among the species pairs ranged from negative, which is predicted to promote coexistence, to positive, which is predicted to promote competitive exclusion. However, these short‐term PSF predictions bore no systematic resemblance to the actual outcomes of competition observed in the LTCE. Other forces may have more strongly influenced the competitive interactions or critical assumptions that underlie the PSF predictions may not have been met. Importantly, the pairwise PSF score derived by Bever et al. is only valid when the two species exhibit an internal equilibrium, corresponding to the Lotka–Volterra competition outcomes of stable coexistence and founder control. Predicting the other two scenarios, competitive exclusion by either species irrespective of initial conditions, requires measuring biomass in uncultured soil, which is methodologically challenging. Subject to several caveats that we discuss, our results call into question whether long‐term competitive outcomes in the field can be predicted from the results of short‐term PSF experiments.