Search for: All records

This article presents the findings of a scoping review looking at conceptualizations of team equity in academic literature between 2017 and 2021. A search and filter process produced a set of 42 publications containing discussion of equity or equality at the team level. A qualitative thematic analysis was carried out on the data resulting in a set of seven themes characterized as facets of team equity: alignment, dialogism, heterophily, participation, power, ownership, and risk. Each facet is presented and illustrated with excerpts from the scoping review data followed by implications for the operationalization of equity at the team level. This analysis sheds light on the multi-dimensionality of equity in a team space, providing context for discussions about the difficulty of using simple quantitative measures for such a complex phenomenon. We hope the facets help researchers and practitioners use and operationalize the concept in ongoing efforts to combat historically-grounded injustices. 

This full paper sets out a methodological protocol for conducting a scoping review of literature relating to teamwork effectiveness and equity. The goal of the study is to understand how academic discourse over the five-year period prior to the study being carried out has conceptualized teamwork success in educational and professional contexts, and to what extent equitable team practices are embedded within such conceptualizations. In line with ongoing initiatives to promote transparency in research, this protocol paper is intended for dissemination prior to the conduct of the study itself. The research context, questions, and rationale are set out, and a detailed methodology described, outlining procedures for data retrieval, screening, extraction, and analysis. The paper concludes with an outline of intended reporting methods for the study, including the reporting of deviations from the procedures set out herein. This paper contributes to the scoping review methodology, and especially its application in the field of engineering education research and education research more broadly. 

The recent “Phace” facial modeling and animation framework [Ichim et al. 2017] introduced a specific formulation of an elastic energy potential that induces mesh elements to approach certain prescribed shapes, modulo rotations. This target shape is defined for each element as an input parameter, and is a multi-dimensional analogue of activation parameters in fiber-based anisotropic muscle models. We argue that the constitutive law suggested by this energy formulation warrants consideration as a highly versatile and practical model of active elastic materials, and could rightfully be regarded as a “baseline” parametric description of active elasticity, in the same fashion that corotational elasticity has largely established itself as the prototypical rotation-invariant model of isotropic elasticity. We present a formulation of this constitutive model in the spirit and style of Finite Element Methods for continuum mechanics, complete with closed form expressions for strain tensors and exact force derivatives for use in implicit and quasistatic schemes. We demonstrate the versatility of the model through various examples in which active elements are employed.