Search for: All records

Abstract Cancer is an umbrella term that includes a wide spectrum of disease severity, from those that are malignant, metastatic, and aggressive to benign lesions with very low potential for progression or death. The ability to prognosticate patient outcomes would facilitate management of various malignancies: patients whose cancer is likely to advance quickly would receive necessary treatment that is commensurate with the predicted biology of the disease. Former prognostic models based on clinical variables (age, gender, cancer stage, tumor grade, etc.), though helpful, cannot account for genetic differences, molecular etiology, tumor heterogeneity, and important host biological mechanisms. Therefore, recent prognostic models have shifted toward the integration of complementary information available in both molecular data and clinical variables to better predict patient outcomes: vital status (overall survival), metastasis (metastasis-free survival), and recurrence (progression-free survival). In this article, we review 20 survival prediction approaches that integrate multi-omics and clinical data to predict patient outcomes. We discuss their strategies for modeling survival time (continuous and discrete), the incorporation of molecular measurements and clinical variables into risk models (clinical and multi-omics data), how to cope with censored patient records, the effectiveness of data integration techniques, prediction methodologies, model validation, and assessment metrics. The goal is to inform life scientists of available resources, and to provide a complete review of important building blocks in survival prediction. At the same time, we thoroughly describe the pros and cons of each methodology, and discuss in depth the outstanding challenges that need to be addressed in future method development. 

Abstract Metabolite profiling is a powerful approach for the clinical diagnosis of complex diseases, ranging from cardiometabolic diseases, cancer, and cognitive disorders to respiratory pathologies and conditions that involve dysregulated metabolism. Because of the importance of systems-level interpretation, many methods have been developed to identify biologically significant pathways using metabolomics data. In this review, we first describe a complete metabolomics workflow (sample preparation, data acquisition, pre-processing, downstream analysis, etc.). We then comprehensively review 24 approaches capable of performing functional analysis, including those that combine metabolomics data with other types of data to investigate the disease-relevant changes at multiple omics layers. We discuss their availability, implementation, capability for pre-processing and quality control, supported omics types, embedded databases, pathway analysis methodologies, and integration techniques. We also provide a rating and evaluation of each software, focusing on their key technique, software accessibility, documentation, and user-friendliness. Following our guideline, life scientists can easily choose a suitable method depending on method rating, available data, input format, and method category. More importantly, we highlight outstanding challenges and potential solutions that need to be addressed by future research. To further assist users in executing the reviewed methods, we provide wrappers of the software packages at https://github.com/tinnlab/metabolite-pathway-review-docker. 

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides expression profiles of individual cells but fails to preserve crucial spatial information. On the other hand, Spatial Transcrip- tomics technologies are able to analyze specific regions within tissue sections, but lack of the capability to examine in single-cell resolution. To overcome these issues, we present Single-cell and Spatial transcriptomics Alignment (SSA), a novel technique that employs an optimal transport algorithm to assign individual cells from a scRNA-seq atlas to their spa- tial locations in actual tissue based on their expression profiles. SSA has demonstrated su- perior performance compared to existing methods SpaOTsc, Tangram, Seurat and DistMap using 10 semi-simulated datasets generated from a high-resolution spatial transcriptomics human breast cancer dataset with 100,064 cells. This advancement provides a refined tool for researchers to delve deeper in understanding of the relationship between cellular spatial organization and gene expression. 

Abstract This manuscript describes the development of a resource module that is part of a learning platform named ‘NIGMS Sandbox for Cloud-based Learning’ (https://github.com/NIGMS/NIGMS-Sandbox). The module delivers learning materials on Cloud-based Consensus Pathway Analysis in an interactive format that uses appropriate cloud resources for data access and analyses. Pathway analysis is important because it allows us to gain insights into biological mechanisms underlying conditions. But the availability of many pathway analysis methods, the requirement of coding skills, and the focus of current tools on only a few species all make it very difficult for biomedical researchers to self-learn and perform pathway analysis efficiently. Furthermore, there is a lack of tools that allow researchers to compare analysis results obtained from different experiments and different analysis methods to find consensus results. To address these challenges, we have designed a cloud-based, self-learning module that provides consensus results among established, state-of-the-art pathway analysis techniques to provide students and researchers with necessary training and example materials. The training module consists of five Jupyter Notebooks that provide complete tutorials for the following tasks: (i) process expression data, (ii) perform differential analysis, visualize and compare the results obtained from four differential analysis methods (limma, t-test, edgeR, DESeq2), (iii) process three pathway databases (GO, KEGG and Reactome), (iv) perform pathway analysis using eight methods (ORA, CAMERA, KS test, Wilcoxon test, FGSEA, GSA, SAFE and PADOG) and (v) combine results of multiple analyses. We also provide examples, source code, explanations and instructional videos for trainees to complete each Jupyter Notebook. The module supports the analysis for many model (e.g. human, mouse, fruit fly, zebra fish) and non-model species. The module is publicly available at https://github.com/NIGMS/Consensus-Pathway-Analysis-in-the-Cloud. This manuscript describes the development of a resource module that is part of a learning platform named ``NIGMS Sandbox for Cloud-based Learning'' https://github.com/NIGMS/NIGMS-Sandbox. The overall genesis of the Sandbox is described in the editorial NIGMS Sandbox [1] at the beginning of this Supplement. This module delivers learning materials on the analysis of bulk and single-cell ATAC-seq data in an interactive format that uses appropriate cloud resources for data access and analyses. 

AI systems have been known to amplify biases in real-world data. Explanations may help human-AI teams address these biases for fairer decision-making. Typically, explanations focus on salient input features. If a model is biased against some protected group, explanations may include features that demonstrate this bias, but when biases are realized through proxy features, the relationship between this proxy feature and the protected one may be less clear to a human. In this work, we study the effect of the presence of protected and proxy features on participants’ perception of model fairness and their ability to improve demographic parity over an AI alone. Further, we examine how different treatments—explanations, model bias disclosure and proxy correlation disclosure—affect fairness perception and parity. We find that explanations help people detect direct but not indirect biases. Additionally, regardless of bias type, explanations tend to increase agreement with model biases. Disclosures can help mitigate this effect for indirect biases, improving both unfairness recognition and decision-making fairness. We hope that our findings can help guide further research into advancing explanations in support of fair human-AI decision-making. 

Abstract Identifying impacted pathways is important because it provides insights into the biology underlying conditions beyond the detection of differentially expressed genes. Because of the importance of such analysis, more than 100 pathway analysis methods have been developed thus far. Despite the availability of many methods, it is challenging for biomedical researchers to learn and properly perform pathway analysis. First, the sheer number of methods makes it challenging to learn and choose the correct method for a given experiment. Second, computational methods require users to be savvy with coding syntax, and comfortable with command‐line environments, areas that are unfamiliar to most life scientists. Third, as learning tools and computational methods are typically implemented only for a few species (i.e., human and some model organisms), it is difficult to perform pathway analysis on other species that are not included in many of the current pathway analysis tools. Finally, existing pathway tools do not allow researchers to combine, compare, and contrast the results of different methods and experiments for both hypothesis testing and analysis purposes. To address these challenges, we developed an open‐source R package for Consensus Pathway Analysis (RCPA) that allows researchers to conveniently: (1) download and process data from NCBI GEO; (2) perform differential analysis using established techniques developed for both microarray and sequencing data; (3) perform both gene set enrichment, as well as topology‐based pathway analysis using different methods that seek to answer different research hypotheses; (4) combine methods and datasets to find consensus results; and (5) visualize analysis results and explore significantly impacted pathways across multiple analyses. This protocol provides many example code snippets with detailed explanations and supports the analysis of more than 1000 species, two pathway databases, three differential analysis techniques, eight pathway analysis tools, six meta‐analysis methods, and two consensus analysis techniques. The package is freely available on the CRAN repository. © 2024 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Processing Affymetrix microarrays Basic Protocol 2: Processing Agilent microarrays Support Protocol: Processing RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq) data Basic Protocol 3: Differential analysis of microarray data (Affymetrix and Agilent) Basic Protocol 4: Differential analysis of RNA‐Seq data Basic Protocol 5: Gene set enrichment analysis Basic Protocol 6: Topology‐based (TB) pathway analysis Basic Protocol 7: Data integration and visualization 

Abstract Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) is a recent technology that allows for the measurement of the expression of all genes in each individual cell contained in a sample. Information at the single-cell level has been shown to be extremely useful in many areas. However, performing single-cell experiments is expensive. Although cellular deconvolution cannot provide the same comprehensive information as single-cell experiments, it can extract cell-type information from bulk RNA data, and therefore it allows researchers to conduct studies at cell-type resolution from existing bulk datasets. For these reasons, a great effort has been made to develop such methods for cellular deconvolution. The large number of methods available, the requirement of coding skills, inadequate documentation, and lack of performance assessment all make it extremely difficult for life scientists to choose a suitable method for their experiment. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of 53 deconvolution methods regarding their methodology, applications, performance, and outstanding challenges. More importantly, the article presents a benchmarking of all these 53 methods using 283 cell types from 30 tissues of 63 individuals. We also provide an R package named DeconBenchmark that allows readers to execute and benchmark the reviewed methods (https://github.com/tinnlab/DeconBenchmark). 

Abstract External factors such as exposure to a chemical, drug, or toxicant (CDT), or conversely, the lack of certain chemicals can cause many diseases. The ability to identify such causal CDTs based on changes in the gene expression profile is extremely important in many studies. Furthermore, the ability to correctly infer CDTs that can revert the gene expression changes induced by a given disease phenotype is a crucial step in drug repurposing. We present an approach for Predicting Upstream REgulators (PURE) designed to tackle this challenge. PURE can correctly infer a CDT from the measured expression changes in a given phenotype, as well as correctly identify drugs that could revert disease-induced gene expression changes. We compared the proposed approach with four classical approaches as well as with the causal analysis used in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) on 16 data sets (1 rat, 5 mouse, and 10 human data sets), involving 8 chemicals or drugs. We assessed the results based on the ability to correctly identify the CDT as indicated by its rank. We also considered the number of false positives, i.e. CDTs other than the correct CDT that were reported to be significant by each method. The proposed approach performed best in 11 out of the 16 experiments, reporting the correct CDT at the very top 7 times. IPA was the second best, reporting the correct CDT at the top 5 times, but was unable to identify the correct CDT at all in 5 out of the 16 experiments. The validation results showed that our approach, PURE, outperformed some of the most popular methods in the field. PURE could effectively infer the true CDTs responsible for the observed gene expression changes and could also be useful in drug repurposing applications.