Search for: All records

Abstract Physical human–robot interactions (pHRI) often provide mechanical force and power to aid walking without requiring voluntary effort from the human. Alternatively, principles of physical human–human interactions (pHHI) can inspire pHRI that aids walking by engaging human sensorimotor processes. We hypothesize that low-force pHHI can intuitively induce a person to alter their walking through haptic communication. In our experiment, an expert partner dancer influenced novice participants to alter step frequency solely through hand interactions. Without prior instruction, training, or knowledge of the expert’s goal, novices decreased step frequency 29% and increased step frequency 18% based on low forces (< 20 N) at the hand. Power transfer at the hands was 3–700 × smaller than what is necessary to propel locomotion, suggesting that hand interactions did not mechanically constrain the novice’s gait. Instead, the sign/direction of hand forces and power may communicate information about how to alter walking. Finally, the expert modulated her arm effective dynamics to match that of each novice, suggesting a bidirectional haptic communication strategy for pHRI that adapts to the human. Our results provide a framework for developing pHRI at the hand that may be applicable to assistive technology and physical rehabilitation, human-robot manufacturing, physical education, and recreation. 

Modeling individual-specific gait dynamics based on kinematic data could aid the development of gait rehabilitation robotics by enabling robots to predict the user’s gait kinematics with and without external inputs, such as mechanical or electrical perturbations. Here we address a current limitation of data-driven gait models, which do not yet predict human gait dynamics nor responses to perturbations. We used Switched Linear Dynamical Systems (SLDS) to model joint angle kinematic data from healthy individuals walking on a treadmill during normal gait and during gait perturbed by functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the ankle muscles. Our SLDS models were able to generate joint angle trajectories in each of four gait phases, as well as across an entire gait cycle, given initial conditions and gait phase information. Because the SLDS dynamics matrices encoded significant coupling across joints that differed across individuals, we compared the SLDS predictions to that of a kinematic model, where the joint angles were independent. Joint angle trajectories generated by SLDS and kinematic models were similar over time horizons of a few milliseconds, but SLDS models provided better predictions of gait kinematics over time horizons of up to a second. We also demonstrated that SLDS models can infer and predict individual-specific responses to FES during swing phase. As such, SLDS models may be a promising approach for online estimation and control of and human gait dynamics, allowing robotic control strategies to be tailored to an individual’s specific gait coordination patterns. 

Human-robot interaction (HRI) for gait rehabilitation would benefit from models of data-driven gait models that account for gait phases and gait dynamics. Here we address the current limitation in gait models driven by kinematic data, which do not model interlimb gait dynamics and have not been shown to precisely identify gait events. We used Switched Linear Dynamical Systems (SLDS) to model joint angle kinematic data from healthy individuals walking on a treadmill with normal gaits and with gaits perturbed by electrical stimulation. We compared the model-inferred gait phases to gait phases measured externally via a force plate. We found that SLDS models accounted for over 88% of the variation in each joint angle and labeled the joint kinematics with the correct gait phase with 84% precision on average. The transitions between hidden states matched measured gait events, with a median absolute difference of 25ms. To our knowledge, this is the first time that SLDS inferred gait phases have been validated by an external measure of gait, instead of against predefined gait phase durations. SLDS provide individual-specific representations of gait that incorporate both gait phases and gait dynamics. SLDS may be useful for developing control policies for HRI aimed at improving gait by allowing for changes in control to be precisely timed to different gait phases.