Search for: All records

We consider the problem of answering temporal queries on RDF stores, in presence of atemporal RDFS domain ontologies, of relational data sources that include temporal information, and of rules that map the domain information in the source schemas into the target ontology. Our proposed practice-oriented solution consists of two rule-based domain-independent algorithms. The first algorithm materializes target RDF data via a version of data exchange that enriches both the data and the ontology with temporal information from the relational sources. The second algorithm accepts as inputs temporal queries expressed in terms of the domain ontology using a lightweight temporal extension of SPARQL, and ensures successful evaluation of the queries on the materialized temporally-enriched RDF data. To study the quality of the information generated by the algorithms, we develop a general framework that formalizes the relational-to-RDF temporal data-exchange problem. The framework includes a chase formalism and a formal solution for the problem of answering temporal queries in the context of relational-to-RDF temporal data exchange. In this article, we present the algorithms and the formal framework that proves correctness of the information output by the algorithms, and also report on the algorithm implementation and experimental results for two application domains. 

Since the early days of relational databases, it was realized that acyclic hypergraphs give rise to database schemas with desirable structural and algorithmic properties. In a bynow classical paper, Beeri, Fagin, Maier, and Yannakakis established several different equivalent characterizations of acyclicity; in particular, they showed that the sets of attributes of a schema form an acyclic hypergraph if and only if the local-to-global consistency property for relations over that schema holds, which means that every collection of pairwise consistent relations over the schema is globally consistent. Even though real-life databases consist of bags (multisets), there has not been a study of the interplay between local consistency and global consistency for bags. We embark on such a study here and we first show that the sets of attributes of a schema form an acyclic hypergraph if and only if the local-to-global consistency property for bags over that schema holds. After this, we explore algorithmic aspects of global consistency for bags by analyzing the computational complexity of the global consistency problem for bags: given a collection of bags, are these bags globally consistent? We show that this problem is in NP, even when the schema is part of the input. We then establish the following dichotomy theorem for fixed schemas: if the schema is acyclic, then the global consistency problem for bags is solvable in polynomial time, while if the schema is cyclic, then the global consistency problem for bags is NP-complete. The latter result contrasts sharply with the state of affairs for relations, where, for each fixed schema, the global consistency problem for relations is solvable in polynomial time. 

The framework of database repairs and consistent answers to queries is a principled approach to managing inconsistent databases. We describe the first system able to compute the consistent answers of general aggregation queries with the COUNT( A ), COUNT (*), and SUM operators, and with or without grouping constructs. Our system uses reductions to optimization versions of Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and then leverages powerful SAT solvers. We carry out an extensive set of experiments on both synthetic and real-world data that demonstrate the usefulness and scalability of this approach. 

We investigate when non-dictatorial aggregation is possible from an algorithmic perspective, where non-dictatorial aggregation means that the votes cast by the members of a society can be aggregated in such a way that there is no single member of the society that always dictates the collective outcome. We consider the setting in which the members of a society take a position on a fixed collection of issues, where for each issue several different alternatives are possible, but the combination of choices must belong to a given set X of allowable voting patterns. Such a set X is called a possibility domain if there is an aggregator that is non-dictatorial, operates separately on each issue, and returns values among those cast by the society on each issue. We design a polynomial-time algorithm that decides, given a set X of voting patterns, whether or not X is a possibility domain. Furthermore, if X is a possibility domain, then the algorithm constructs in polynomial time a non-dictatorial aggregator for X. Furthermore, we show that the question of whether a Boolean domain X is a possibility domain is in NLOGSPACE. We also design a polynomial-time algorithm that decides whether X is a uniform possibility domain, that is, whether X admits an aggregator that is non-dictatorial even when restricted to any two positions for each issue. As in the case of possibility domains, the algorithm also constructs in polynomial time a uniform non-dictatorial aggregator, if one exists. Then, we turn our attention to the case where X is given implicitly, either as the set of assignments satisfying a propositional formula, or as a set of consistent evaluations of a sequence of propositional formulas. In both cases, we provide bounds to the complexity of deciding if X is a (uniform) possibility domain. Finally, we extend our results to four types of aggregators that have appeared in the literature: generalized dictatorships, whose outcome is always an element of their input, anonymous aggregators, whose outcome is not affected by permutations of their input, monotone, whose outcome does not change if more individuals agree with it and systematic, which aggregate every issue in the same way. 

We investigate the practical aspects of computing the necessary and possible winners in elections over incomplete voter preferences. In the case of the necessary winners, we show how to implement and accelerate the polynomial-time algorithm of Xia and Conitzer. In the case of the possible winners, where the problem is NP-hard, we give a natural reduction to Integer Linear Programming (ILP) for all positional scoring rules and implement it in a leading commercial optimization solver. Further, we devise optimization techniques to minimize the number of ILP executions and, oftentimes, avoid them altogether. We conduct a thorough experimental study that includes the construction of a rich benchmark of election data based on real and synthetic data. Our findings suggest that, the worst-case intractability of the possible winners notwithstanding, the algorithmic techniques presented here scale well and can be used to compute the possible winners in realistic scenarios. 

The query containment problem is a fundamental algorithmic prob- lem in data management. While this problem is well understood under set semantics, it is by far less understood under bag semantics. In particular, it is a long-standing open question whether or not the conjunctive query containment problem under bag semantics is decidable. We unveil tight connections between information theory and the conjunctive query containment under bag semantics. These connections are established using information inequalities, which are considered to be the laws of information theory. Our first main result asserts that deciding the validity of a generalization of infor- mation inequalities is many-one equivalent to the restricted case of conjunctive query containment in which the containing query is acyclic; thus, either both these problems are decidable or both are undecidable. Our second main result identifies a new decidable case of the conjunctive query containment problem under bag semantics. Specifically, we give an exponential time algorithm for conjunctive query containment under bag semantics, provided the containing query is chordal and admits a simple junction tree.