Search for: All records

The mysterious deep-sea shrimp Physetocaris microphthalma Chace, 1940 remains a challenge for the understanding of caridean shrimp systematics. Upon first description in 1940, the unique morphology in combination with lack of material made the allocation of P. microphthalma to any family or superfamily difficult, therefore the monotypic superfamily Physetocaridoidea and family Physetocarididae were described. The rarity of the species, only documented a few times in scientific literature, in combination with a circumglobal distribution, makes the advancement of the systematics and biology of this shrimp challenging. Current literature places Physetocaridoidea as a superfamily with a sister relationship to Pandaloidea but this relationship has never been tested using molecular data. Recent expeditions to the northern Gulf of Mexico and north-eastern Pacific Ocean provided fresh material for inclusion in phylogenetic analyses. Here, we used a molecular systematics approach to investigate the phylogenetic placement of this species within the infraorder Caridea and test for cryptic diversity across oceanic basins. We sequenced five genes (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, H3, NaK and PEPCK) and built phylogenetic trees including specimens across Pandaloidea and other carideans (n = 75) using maximum-likelihood and Bayesian approaches. Our results strongly support the inclusion of P. microphthalma within the family Pandalidae and superfamily Pandaloidea, indicating that the superfamily Physetocaridoidea and family Physetocaridae are not valid. In addition, the inclusion of specimens from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans does not support evidence of cryptic diversity, suggesting the global distribution of P. microphthalma. This is the first study to provide genetic data for this species, resulting in an updated classification for the infraorder Caridea and highlighting that deep-pelagic species can be rare yet still widely distributed. 

The deep-sea environment is associated with a wide range of anatomically specialized morphologies allowing camouflage in this low or no light environment. Specialized ultra-black coloration has been documented in the pelican eel, Eurypharynx pelecanoides, but has not been explored in the other largely deep-sea inhabiting pelagic anguilloid eels. Histological examination of the integument revealed a layer of free melanosomes in the superficial dermis consistent with specialized ultra-black camouflage in the swallower eels Saccopharynx, the bobtail snipe eel Cyema, the sawtooth eels Serrivomer, and the snipe eels Avocettina and Nemichthys. The anatomy in these taxa is consistent with the previously described ultra-black morphology, except that Nemichthys, Avocettina, and Serrivomer have both large amounts of free melanosomes and melanophores. Consideration of this morphology in the context of anguilloid eel evolution in the deep-sea environment suggests repeated independent evolution of ultra-black coloration within the anguilloids, and greater development in the taxa more specifically associated with the bathypelagic habitats and the production of bioluminescence. 

Siphonophores (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) are abundant and diverse gelatinous predators in open-ocean ecosystems. Due to limited access to the midwater, little is known about the diets of most deep-dwelling gelatinous species, which constrains our understanding of food-web structure and nutrient flow in these vast ecosystems. Visual gut-content methods can rarely identify soft-bodied rapidly-digested prey, while observations from submersibles often overlook small prey items. These methods have been differentially applied to shallow and deep siphonophore taxa, confounding habitat and methodological biases. DNA metabarcoding can be used to assess both shallow and deep species’ diets under a common methodological framework, since it can detect both small and gelatinous prey. We (1) further characterized the diets of open-ocean siphonophores using DNA metabarcoding, (2) compared the prey detected by visual and molecular methods to evaluate their technical biases, and (3) evaluated tentacle-based predictions of diet. To do this, we performed DNA metabarcoding analyses on the gut contents of 39 siphonophore species across depths to describe their diets, using six barcode regions along the 18S gene. Taxonomic identifications were assigned using public databases combined with local zooplankton sequences. We identified 55 unique prey items, including crustaceans, gelatinous animals, and fish across 47 siphonophore specimens in 24 species. We reported 29 novel predator-prey interactions, among them the first insights into the diets of nine siphonophore species, many of which were congruent with the dietary predictions based on tentilla morphology. Our analyses detected both small and gelatinous prey taxa underrepresented by visual methods in species from both shallow and deep habitats, indicating that siphonophores play similar trophic roles across depth habitats. We also reveal hidden links between siphonophores and filter-feeders near the base of the food web. This study expands our understanding of the ecological roles of siphonophores in the open ocean, their trophic roles within the ‘jelly-web’, and the importance of their diversity for nutrient flow and ecosystem functioning. Understanding these inconspicuous yet ubiquitous predator-prey interactions is critical to predict the impacts of climate change, overfishing, and conservation policies on oceanic ecosystems. 

Our perception of deep-sea communities has evolved as various sampling approaches have captured different components of deep-sea habitats. We sampled midwater zooplankton assemblages in Monterey Bay, California to quantify community composition (abundance and biomass) and biodiversity (at the Order level) across three depth ranges, and the effects of sampling methodology on community parameters. We collected zooplankton using two types of opening-closing trawls [Tucker Trawl and Multiple Opening/Closing Net and Environmental Sensing System (MOCNESS)] and video recordings from a remotely operated vehicle (ROV). We quantified the relative contributions of microbes to community biomass using synoptic water-bottle casts and flow cytometry. Overall, the pelagic community was most similar between the Tucker trawl and ROV (dissimilarity = 52.4%) and least similar between the MOCNESS and ROV (dissimilarity = 65.8%). Dissimilarity between sampling methods was driven by the relative abundances of crustaceans and gelatinous taxa, where gelatinous animals (cnidarians, ctenophores, tunicates) were more abundant in ROV surveys (64.2%) and Tucker trawls (46.8%) compared to MOCNESS samples (14.5%). ROV surveys were the only method that sufficiently documented the most physically delicate taxa (e.g., physonect siphonophores, lobate ctenophores, and larvaceans). Biomass was also one order of magnitude lower in MOCNESS trawls compared to Tucker trawls. Due to these large differences, the relative contributions of microbes to total biomass were substantially lower in Tucker trawl samples (mean = 7.5%) compared to MOCNESS samples (mean = 51%). These results illustrate that our view of planktonic composition and community biomass is strongly dependent on sampling methodology.