Search for: All records

DWARF14 (D14) is an ɑ/β‐hydrolase and receptor for the plant hormone strigolactone (SL) in angiosperms. Upon SL perception, D14 works with MORE AXILLARY GROWTH2 (MAX2) to trigger polyubiquitination and degradation of DWARF53(D53)‐type proteins in the SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2 1‐LIKE (SMXL) family. We used CRISPR‐Cas9 to generate knockout alleles of the two homoeologousD14genes in theNicotiana benthamianagenome. TheNbd14a,bdouble mutant had several phenotypes that are consistent with the loss of SL perception in other plants, including increased axillary bud outgrowth, reduced height, shortened petioles, and smaller leaves. A ratiometric fluorescent reporter system was used to monitor degradation of SMXL7 fromArabidopsis thaliana(AtSMXL7) after transient expression inN. benthamianaand treatment with the strigolactone analog GR24. AtSMXL7 was degraded after treatment with GR24^5DS, which has the stereochemical configuration of natural SLs, as well as its enantiomer GR24^ent‐5DS. InNbd14a,bleaves, AtSMXL7 abundance was unaffected byrac‐GR24 or either GR24 stereoisomer. Transient coexpression of AtD14 with the AtSMXL7 reporter inNbd14a,brestored the degradation response torac‐GR24, but required an active catalytic triad. We used this platform to evaluate the ability of several AtD14 mutants that had not been characterized in plants to target AtSMXL7 for degradation.

 

The butenolide molecule, karrikin (KAR), emerging in smoke of burned plant material, enhances light responses such as germination, inhibition of hypocotyl elongation, and anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. The KAR signaling pathway consists of KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 (KAI2) and MORE AXILLARY GROWTH 2 (MAX2), which, upon activation, act in an SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase complex to target the downstream signaling components SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2 1 (SMAX1) and SMAX1‐LIKE 2 (SMXL2) for degradation. How degradation of SMAX1 and SMXL2 is translated into growth responses remains unknown. Although light clearly influences the activity of KAR, the molecular connection between the two pathways is still poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the KAR signaling pathway promotes the activity of a transcriptional module consisting of ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5), B‐BOX DOMAIN PROTEIN 20 (BBX20), and BBX21. Thebbx20 bbx21mutant is largely insensitive to treatment with KAR₂, similar to ahy5mutant, with regards to inhibition of hypocotyl elongation and anthocyanin accumulation. Detailed analysis of higher order mutants in combination with RNA‐sequencing analysis revealed that anthocyanin accumulation downstream of SMAX1 and SMXL2 is fully dependent on the HY5‐BBX module. However, the promotion of hypocotyl elongation by SMAX1 and SMXL2 is, in contrast to KAR₂treatment, only partially dependent on BBX20, BBX21, and HY5. Taken together, these results suggest that light‐ and KAR‐dependent signaling intersect at the HY5‐BBX transcriptional module.

 

Strigolactones and karrikins are butenolide molecules that regulate plant growth. They are perceived by the α/β‐hydrolase DWARF14 (D14) and its homologue KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2), respectively. Plant‐derived strigolactones have a butenolide ring with a methyl group that is essential for bioactivity. By contrast, karrikins are abiotic in origin, and the butenolide methyl group is nonessential. KAI2 is probably a receptor for an endogenous butenolide, but the identity of this compound remains unknown.

Here we characterise the specificity of KAI2 towards differing butenolide ligands using genetic and biochemical approaches.

We find that KAI2 proteins from multiple species are most sensitive to desmethyl butenolides that lack a methyl group. Desmethyl‐GR24 and desmethyl‐CN‐debranone are active by KAI2 but not D14. They are more potent KAI2 agonists compared with their methyl‐substituted reference compounds bothin vitroand in plants. The preference of KAI2 for desmethyl butenolides is conserved inSelaginella moellendorffiiandMarchantia polymorpha, suggesting that it is an ancient trait in land plant evolution.

Our findings provide insight into the mechanistic basis for differential ligand perception by KAI2 and D14, and support the view that the endogenous substrates for KAI2 and D14 have distinct chemical structures and biosynthetic origins.

 

Karrikin (KAR) molecules found in smoke stimulate seed germination of many plant species that emerge after fire. Genetic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have identified core components of the KAR signaling pathway, including an α/β-hydrolase, KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2), that is required for KAR responses. Although KAI2 is often considered a KAR receptor, recent evidence suggests that KARs may require metabolism to become bioactive signals. In addition to sensing KARs or a KAR-derived signal, KAI2 is thought to recognize an unknown endogenous signal, KAI2 ligand (KL). We generated loss-of-function mutations in KARRIKIN-UP-REGULATED F-BOX1 ( KUF1 ), which is a transcriptional marker of KAR/KL signaling in A. thaliana and other plants. The kuf1 mutant in Arabidopsis shows several phenotypes that are consistent with enhanced activity of the KAI2 pathway, including reduced hypocotyl elongation, enhanced cotyledon expansion in light-grown seedlings, increased root hair density and elongation, and differential expression of KAR/KL-responsive transcriptional markers. Seedling phenotypes of kuf1 are dependent on KAI2 and its signaling partner MORE AXILLARY GROWTH2 (MAX2). Furthermore, kuf1 mutants are hypersensitive to KAR 1 , but not to other molecules that can signal through KAI2 such as GR24. This implies that kuf1 does not increase the overall responsiveness of the KAI2-dependent signaling pathway, but specifically affects the ability of KAI2 to detect certain signals. We hypothesize that KUF1 imposes feedback inhibition of KL biosynthesis and KAR 1 metabolism. As an F-box protein, KUF1 likely participates in an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that imposes this regulation through polyubiquitylation of a protein target(s). 

Karrikins (KARs) are chemicals in smoke that can enhance germination of many plants. Lactuca sativa cv. Grand Rapids (lettuce), germinates in the presence of nanomolar karrikinolide (KAR1). We found that lettuce is much less responsive to KAR2 or a mixture of synthetic strigolactone analogs, rac-GR24. We investigated the molecular basis of selective and sensitive KAR1 perception in lettuce. The lettuce genome contains two copies of KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2), a receptor that is required for KAR responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. LsKAI2b is more highly expressed than LsKAI2a in dry achenes and during early stages of seed imbibition. Through cross-species complementation assays in Arabidopsis we found that LsKAI2b confers robust responses to KAR1, but LsKAI2a does not. Therefore, LsKAI2b likely mediates KAR1 responses in lettuce. We compared homology models of the ligand-binding pockets of KAI2 proteins from lettuce and a fire follower, Emmenanthe penduliflora. This identified pocket residues 96, 124, 139, and 161 as candidates that influence the ligand-specificity of KAI2. Further support for the significance of these residues was found through a broader comparison of pocket residue conservation among 324 asterid KAI2 proteins. We tested the effects of substitutions at these four positions in Arabidopsis thaliana KAI2 and found that a broad array of responses to KAR1, KAR2, and rac-GR24 could be achieved. 

ABSTRACT Gene-editing tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 have created unprecedented opportunities for genetic studies in plants and animals. We designed a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) to train introductory biology students in the concepts and implementation of gene-editing technology as well as develop their soft skills in data management and scientific communication. We present two versions of the course that can be implemented with twice-weekly meetings over a 5-week period. In the remote-learning version, students performed homology searches, designed guide RNAs (gRNAs) and primers, and learned the principles of molecular cloning. This version is appropriate when access to laboratory equipment or in-person instruction is limited, such as during closures that have occurred in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In person, students designed gRNAs, cloned CRISPR-Cas9 constructs, and performed genetic transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana . Students learned how to design effective gRNA pairs targeting their assigned gene with an 86% success rate. Final exams tested students’ ability to apply knowledge of an unfamiliar genome database to characterize gene structure and to properly design gRNAs. Average final exam scores of ∼73% and ∼84% for in-person and remote-learning CUREs, respectively, indicated that students met learning outcomes. The highly parallel nature of the CURE makes it possible to target dozens to hundreds of genes, depending on the number of sections. Applying this approach in a sensitized mutant background enables focused reverse genetic screens for genetic suppressors or enhancers. The course can be adapted readily to other organisms or projects that employ gene editing. 

Abstract Chemical signals known as strigolactones were discovered more than 50 years ago as host-derived germination stimulants of parasitic plants in the Orobanchaceae. Strigolactone-responsive germination is an essential adaptation of obligate parasites in this family, which depend upon a host for survival. Several species of obligate parasites, including witchweeds (Striga, Alectra spp.) and broomrapes (Orobanche, Phelipanche spp.), are highly destructive agricultural weeds that pose a significant threat to global food security. Understanding how parasites sense strigolactones and other host-derived stimulants will catalyze the development of innovative chemical and biological control methods. This review synthesizes the recent discoveries of strigolactone receptors in parasitic Orobanchaceae, their signaling mechanism, and key steps in their evolution. 

Gene editing tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 have created unprecedented opportunities for genetic studies in plants and animals. We designed a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) to train introductory biology students in the concepts and implementation of gene editing technology as well as develop their soft skills in data management and scientific communication. We present two versions of the course that can be implemented with twice- weekly meetings over a five-week period. In the remote-learning version, students perform homology searches, design guide RNAs and primers, and learn the principles of molecular cloning. This version is appropriate when access to laboratory equipment or in-person instruction is limited, such as closures that have occurred in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. In the in-person version, students design guide RNAs, clone CRISPR-Cas9 constructs, and perform genetic transformation of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. The highly parallel nature of the CURE makes it possible to target dozens to hundreds of genes, depending on the number of course sections available. Applying this approach in a sensitized mutant background enables focused reverse genetic screens for genetic suppressors or enhancers. The course can be readily adapted to other organisms or projects that employ gene editing. 

This review focuses on the evolution of plant hormone signaling pathways. Like the chemical nature of the hormones themselves, the signaling pathways are diverse. Therefore, we focus on a group of hormones whose primary perception mechanism involves an Skp1/Cullin/F-box-type ubiquitin ligase: auxin, jasmonic acid, gibberellic acid, and strigolactone. We begin with a comparison of the core signaling pathways of these four hormones, which have been established through studies conducted in model organisms in the Angiosperms. With the advent of next-generation sequencing and advanced tools for genetic manipulation, the door to understanding the origins of hormone signaling mechanisms in plants beyond these few model systems has opened. For example, in-depth phylogenetic analyses of hormone signaling components are now being complemented by genetic studies in early diverging land plants. Here we discuss recent investigations of how basal land plants make and sense hormones. Finally, we propose connections between the emergence of hormone signaling complexity and major developmental transitions in plant evolution.