Search for: All records

One of the most important and well-studied settings for network design is edge-connectivity requirements. This encompasses uniform demands such as the Minimum k-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem (k-ECSS), as well as nonuniform demands such as the Survivable Network Design problem. A weakness of these formulations, though, is that we are not able to ask for fault-tolerance larger than the connectivity. Taking inspiration from recent definitions and progress in graph spanners, we introduce and study new variants of these problems under a notion of relative fault-tolerance. Informally, we require not that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults (as in the classical setting), but that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults and the two nodes are connected in the underlying graph post-faults. That is, the subgraph we build must "behave" identically to the underlying graph with respect to connectivity after bounded faults. We define and introduce these problems, and provide the first approximation algorithms: a (1+4/k)-approximation for the unweighted relative version of k-ECSS, a 2-approximation for the weighted relative version of k-ECSS, and a 27/4-approximation for the special case of Relative Survivable Network Design with only a single demand with a connectivity requirement of 3. To obtain these results, we introduce a number of technical ideas that may of independent interest. First, we give a generalization of Jain’s iterative rounding analysis that works even when the cut-requirement function is not weakly supermodular, but instead satisfies a weaker definition we introduce and term local weak supermodularity. Second, we prove a structure theorem and design an approximation algorithm utilizing a new decomposition based on important separators, which are structures commonly used in fixed-parameter algorithms that have not commonly been used in approximation algorithms. 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00453-021-00866-z 

Directed Steiner Tree (DST) is a central problem in combinatorial optimization and theoretical computer science: Given a directed graph G = (V, E) with edge costs c ∈ ℝ_{≥ 0}^E, a root r ∈ V and k terminals K ⊆ V, we need to output a minimum-cost arborescence in G that contains an rrightarrow t path for every t ∈ K. Recently, Grandoni, Laekhanukit and Li, and independently Ghuge and Nagarajan, gave quasi-polynomial time O(log²k/log log k)-approximation algorithms for the problem, which are tight under popular complexity assumptions. In this paper, we consider the more general Degree-Bounded Directed Steiner Tree (DB-DST) problem, where we are additionally given a degree bound d_v on each vertex v ∈ V, and we require that every vertex v in the output tree has at most d_v children. We give a quasi-polynomial time (O(log n log k), O(log² n))-bicriteria approximation: The algorithm produces a solution with cost at most O(log nlog k) times the cost of the optimum solution that violates the degree constraints by at most a factor of O(log²n). This is the first non-trivial result for the problem. While our cost-guarantee is nearly optimal, the degree violation factor of O(log²n) is an O(log n)-factor away from the approximation lower bound of Ω(log n) from the Set Cover hardness. The hardness result holds even on the special case of the Degree-Bounded Group Steiner Tree problem on trees (DB-GST-T). With the hope of closing the gap, we study the question of whether the degree violation factor can be made tight for this special case. We answer the question in the affirmative by giving an (O(log nlog k), O(log n))-bicriteria approximation algorithm for DB-GST-T.