Search for: All records

Abstract PremiseWhile many studies have measured the aboveground responses of plants to mycorrhizal fungi at a single time point, little is known about how plants respond belowground or across time to mycorrhizal symbiosis. By measuring belowground responses and growth over time in many plant species, we create a more complete picture of how mycorrhizal fungi benefit their hosts. MethodsWe grew 26 prairie plant species with and without mycorrhizal fungi and measured 14 functional traits to assess above‐ and belowground tissue quality and quantity responses and changes in resource allocation. We used function‐valued trait (FVT) modeling to characterize changes in species growth rate when colonized. ResultsWhile aboveground biomass responses were positive, the response of traits belowground were much more variable. Changes in aboveground biomass accounted for 60.8% of the variation in mycorrhizal responses, supporting the use of aboveground biomass response as the primary response trait. Responses belowground were not associated with aboveground responses and accounted for 18.3% of the variation. Growth responses over time were highly variable across species. Interestingly, none of the measured responses were phylogenetically conserved. ConclusionsMycorrhizal fungi increase plant growth in most scenarios, but the effects of these fungi belowground and across time are more complicated. This study highlights how differences in plant allocation priorities might affect how they utilize the benefits from mycorrhizal fungi. Identifying and characterizing these differences is a key step to understanding the effects of mycorrhizal mutualisms on whole plant physiology. 

Native legumes are functionally important members of grasslands, but their reintroduction into degraded systems is limited by strong establishment filters. One of these establishment filters might be rhizobia limitation, where legume seedlings are unable to find suitable rhizobia symbionts in grasslands targeted for restoration. To test links between rhizobial inoculation and legume demographic parameters in a grassland restoration context, we evaluated how inoculation with rhizobia altered survival and seed production of a native annual legume (Chamaecrista fasciculata) inoculated with rhizobia and transplanted into a restored prairie. Small mammal herbivory was an important filter affecting survival ofC. fasciculatatransplants, with inoculated plants 81% more likely to be grazed than uninoculated plants. Despite this heavy grazing, plants inoculated with rhizobia survived transplantation 71% more often and, as a result, produced 82% more flowers, experienced 73% more visits by pollinators, and on average produced 220% more seeds. Our results indicate that although herbivory may also shape legume population establishment, at least in some years in some places, rhizobia could alterC. fasciculatainteractions with both herbivores and pollinators and improve population establishment. 

Soil microbial mutualists like rhizobia bacteria can promote the establishment of rare, late‐successional legumes. Despite restoration efforts, these mutualists are often absent in the microbiome. Therefore, restoring this mutualism by directly inoculating rare legumes with rhizobia mutualists may increase plant establishment. We inoculated seedlings ofAmorpha canescens,Dalea purpurea, andLespedeza capitatawith three strains of species‐specific rhizobia each to investigate how this mutualism would promote growth in the field and in the greenhouse. Because many herbaceous plants are vulnerable to herbivory, we used exclosures for half of our field transplantations to prevent mammalian herbivory. We did not find that rhizobia bacteria directly promoted the growth of our legumes in the field but rather that herbivory and environmental conditions overwhelmed the effects of the rhizobia. Of the plants transplanted, only 17.78% of 180 survived to the end of the growing season, all of which were protected from herbivory. Survival at the end of the growing season was also greater in the northern, drier end of the field site. In the second growing season, plants were more likely to survive in the exclosure treatment, while only four recovered in the open treatment. In the greenhouse, we found increased nodulation with inoculations, supporting the hypothesis that species‐specific mutualists are absent from restoration sites. Though several recent studies have shown that restoring mutualistic interactions has the potential to dramatically improve the outcomes of ecological restoration, our results show that protecting rare species from herbivory after transplantation might achieve greater gains in establishment.