Search for: All records

Abstract The genetic control of many plant traits can be highly complex. Both allelic variation (sequence change) and dosage variation (copy number change) contribute to a plant's phenotype. While numerous studies have investigated the effect of allelic or dosage variation, very few have documented both within the same system, leaving their relative contribution to phenotypic effects unclear. The Populus genome is highly polymorphic, and poplars are fairly tolerant of gene dosage variation. Here, using a previously established Populus hybrid F1 population, we assessed and compared the effect of natural allelic variation and induced dosage variation on biomass, phenology, and leaf morphology traits. We identified QTLs for many of these traits, but our results indicate limited overlap between the QTLs associated with natural allelic variation and induced dosage variation. Additionally, the integration of data from both allelic and dosage variation identifies a larger set of QTLs that together explain a larger percentage of the phenotypic variance. Finally, our results suggest that the effect of the large indels might mask that of allelic QTLs. Our study helps clarify the relationship between allelic and dosage variation and their effects on quantitative traits. 

Adaptive evolution often involves structural variation affecting genes or cis-regulatory changes that engender novel and favorable gain-of-function gene regulation. Such mutation could result in a favorable dominant trait. At the same time, the gene product could be dosage sensitive if its change in concentration disrupts another trait. As a result, the mutant allele would display dosage-sensitive pleiotropy (DSP). By minimizing imbalance while conserving the favorable dominant effect, heterozygosity can increase fitness and result in heterosis. The properties of these alleles are consistent with evidence from multiple studies that indicate increased fitness of heterozygous regulatory mutations. DSP can help explain mysterious properties of heterosis as well as other effects of hybridization. 

We eat or interact with crops every day for food (tomatoes, lettuce, apples, rice, etc.), for feeding animals (hay, corn), or for a wide variety of other uses (wood, cotton). All crops come from wild plants that do not look anything like the ones we buy at the store. That is because they have been selected to look and behave in very specific ways that fit the needs of farmers, sellers, and us—the consumers. The process of developing new varieties is called breeding. Plant breeding is a complicated and lengthy process. Why do we need to breed plants? Because climate and environmental conditions are changing quickly and breeding new varieties that can survive in these new conditions or meet new needs is even more critical than before. In this article, we explain why breeding takes so long, and we discuss recent scientific findings that might help speed up the process. 

Chromoanagenesis is a single catastrophic event that involves, in most cases, localized chromosomal shattering and reorganization, resulting in a dramatically restructured chromosome. First discovered in cancer cells, it has since been observed in various other systems, including plants. In this review, we discuss the origin, characteristics, and potential mechanisms underlying chromoanagenesis in plants. We report that multiple processes, including mutagenesis and genetic engineering, can trigger chromoanagenesis via a variety of mechanisms such as micronucleation, breakage–fusion–bridge (BFB) cycles, or chain-like translocations. The resulting rearranged chromosomes can be preserved during subsequent plant growth, and sometimes inherited to the next generation. Because of their high tolerance to genome restructuring, plants offer a unique system for investi- gating the evolutionary consequences and potential practical applications of chromoanagenesis. 

Abstract Large-scale structural variations, such as chromosomal translocations, can have profound effects on fitness and phenotype, but are difficult to identify and characterize. Here, we describe a simple and effective method aimed at identifying translocations using only the dosage of sequence reads mapped on the reference genome. We binned reads on genomic segments sized according to sequencing coverage and identified instances when copy number segregated in populations. For each dosage-polymorphic 1 Mb bin, we tested independence, effectively an apparent linkage disequilibrium (LD), with other variable bins. In nine potato (Solanum tuberosum) dihaploid families translocations affecting pericentromeric regions were common and in two cases were due to genomic misassembly. In two populations, we found evidence for translocation affecting euchromatic arms. In cv. PI 310467, a nonreciprocal translocation between chromosomes (chr.) 7 and 8 resulted in a 5–3 copy number change affecting several Mb at the respective chromosome tips. In cv. “Alca Tarma,” the terminal arm of chr. 4 translocated to the tip of chr. 1. Using oligonucleotide-based fluorescent in situ hybridization painting probes (oligo-FISH), we tested and confirmed the predicted arrangement in PI 310467. In 192 natural accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana, dosage haplotypes tended to vary continuously and resulted in higher noise, while apparent LD between pericentromeric regions suggested the effect of repeats. This method, LD-CNV, should be useful in species where translocations are suspected because it tests linkage without the need for genotyping.