Search for: All records

Abstract Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated nuclease (Cas) technologies facilitate routine genome engineering of one or a few genes at a time. However, large-scale CRISPR screens with guide RNA libraries remain challenging in plants. Here, we have developed a comprehensive all-in-one CRISPR toolbox for Cas9-based genome editing, cytosine base editing, adenine base editing (ABE), Cas12a-based genome editing and ABE, and CRISPR-Act3.0-based gene activation in both monocot and dicot plants. We evaluated all-in-one T-DNA expression vectors in rice (Oryza sativa, monocot) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum, dicot) protoplasts, demonstrating their broad and reliable applicability. To showcase the applications of these vectors in CRISPR screens, we constructed guide RNA (gRNA) pools for testing in rice protoplasts, establishing a high-throughput approach to select high-activity gRNAs. Additionally, we demonstrated the efficacy of sgRNA library screening for targeted mutagenesis of ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE in rice, recovering novel candidate alleles for herbicide resistance. Furthermore, we carried out a CRISPR activation screen in Arabidopsis thaliana, rapidly identifying potent gRNAs for FLOWERING LOCUS T activation that confer an early-flowering phenotype. This toolbox contains 61 versatile all-in-one vectors encompassing nearly all commonly used CRISPR technologies. It will facilitate large-scale genetic screens for loss-of-function or gain-of-function studies, presenting numerous promising applications in plants. 

Summary Class 2 Type V‐A CRISPR‐Cas (Cas12a) nucleases are powerful genome editing tools, particularly effective in A/T‐rich genomic regions, complementing the widely used CRISPR‐Cas9 in plants. To enhance the utility of Cas12a, we investigate three Cas12a orthologs—Mb3Cas12a, PrCas12a, and HkCas12a—in plants. Protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) requirements, editing efficiencies, and editing profiles are compared in rice. Among these orthologs, Mb3Cas12a exhibits high editing efficiency at target sites with a simpler, relaxed TTV PAM which is less restrictive than the canonical TTTV PAM of LbCas12a and AsCas12a. To optimize Mb3Cas12a, we develop an efficient single transcription unit (STU) system by refining the linker between Mb3Cas12a and CRISPR RNA (crRNA), nuclear localization signal (NLS), and direct repeat (DR). This optimized system enables precise genome editing in rice, particularly for fine‐tuning target gene expression by editing promoter regions. Further, we introduced Arginine (R) substitutions at Aspartic acid (D) 172, Asparagine (N) 573, and Lysine (K) 579 of Mb3Cas12a, creating two temperature‐tolerant variants: Mb3Cas12a‐R (D172R) and Mb3Cas12a‐RRR (D172R/N573R/K579R). These variants demonstrate significantly improved editing efficiency at lower temperatures (22 °C and 28 °C) in rice cells, with Mb3Cas12a‐RRR showing the best performance. We extend this approach by developing efficient Mb3Cas12a‐RRR STU systems in maize and tomato, achieving biallelic mutants targeting single or multiple genes in T₀lines cultivated at 28 °C and 25 °C, respectively. This study significantly expands Cas12a's targeting capabilities in plant genome editing, providing valuable tools for future research and practical applications. 

Abstract Cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs) enable precise C-to-T and A-to-G edits. Recently, ABE8e, derived from TadA-8e, enhances A-to-G edits in mammalian cells and plants. Interestingly, TadA-8e can also be evolved to confer C-to-T editing. This study compares engineered CBEs derived from TadA-8e in rice and tomato cells, identifying TadCBEa, TadCBEd, and TadCBEd_V106W as efficient CBEs with high purity and a narrow editing window. A dual base editor, TadDE, promotes simultaneous C-to-T and A-to-G editing. Multiplexed base editing with TadCBEa and TadDE is demonstrated in transgenic rice, with no off-target effects detected by whole genome and transcriptome sequencing, indicating high specificity. Finally, two crop engineering applications using TadDE are shown: introducing herbicide resistance alleles inOsALSand creating synonymous mutations inOsSPL14to resistOsMIR156-mediated degradation. Together, this study presents TadA-8e derived CBEs and a dual base editor as valuable additions to the plant editing toolbox. 

Summary CRISPR‐Cas9 is widely used for genome editing, but its PAM sequence requirements limit its efficiency. In this study, we exploreFaecalibaculum rodentiumCas9 (FrCas9) for plant genome editing, especially in rice. FrCas9 recognizes a concise 5′‐NNTA‐3′ PAM, targeting more abundant palindromic TA sites in plant genomes than the 5′‐NGG‐3′ PAM sites of the most popular SpCas9. FrCas9 shows cleavage activities at all tested 5′‐NNTA‐3′ PAM sites with editing outcomes sharing the same characteristics of a typical CRISPR‐Cas9 system. FrCas9 induces high‐efficiency targeted mutagenesis in stable rice lines, readily generating biallelic mutants with expected phenotypes. We augment FrCas9's ability to generate larger deletions through fusion with the exonuclease, TREX2. TREX2‐FrCas9 generates much larger deletions than FrCas9 without compromise in editing efficiency. We demonstrate TREX2‐FrCas9 as an efficient tool for genetic knockout of a microRNA gene. Furthermore, FrCas9‐derived cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABE) are developed to produce targeted C‐to‐T and A‐to‐G base edits in rice plants. Whole‐genome sequencing‐based off‐target analysis suggests that FrCas9 is a highly specific nuclease. Expression of TREX2‐FrCas9 in plants, however, causes detectable guide RNA‐independent off‐target mutations, mostly as single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Together, we have established an efficient CRISPR‐FrCas9 system for targeted mutagenesis, large deletions, C‐to‐T base editing, and A‐to‐G base editing in plants. The simple palindromic TA motif in the PAM makes the CRISPR‐FrCas9 system a promising tool for genome editing in plants with an expanded targeting scope. 

Abstract Among CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems,Streptococcus pyogenesCas9 (SpCas9), sourced from a human pathogen, is the most widely used. Here, through in silico data mining, we have established an efficient plant genome engineering system using CRISPR-Cas9 from probioticLactobacillus rhamnosus. We have confirmed the predicted 5’-NGAAA-3’ PAM via a bacterial PAM depletion assay and showcased its exceptional editing efficiency in rice, wheat, tomato, and Larix cells, surpassing LbCas12a, SpCas9-NG, and SpRY when targeting the identical sequences. In stable rice lines, LrCas9 facilitates multiplexed gene knockout through coding sequence editing and achieves gene knockdown via targeted promoter deletion, demonstrating high specificity. We have also developed LrCas9-derived cytosine and adenine base editors, expanding base editing capabilities. Finally, by harnessing LrCas9’s A/T-rich PAM targeting preference, we have created efficient CRISPR interference and activation systems in plants. Together, our work establishes CRISPR-LrCas9 as an efficient and user-friendly genome engineering tool for diverse applications in crops and beyond. 

Abstract The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems have been demonstrated to be the foremost compelling genetic tools for manipulating prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Despite the robustness and versatility of Cas9 and Cas12a/b nucleases in mammalian cells and plants, their large protein sizes may hinder downstream applications. Therefore, investigating compact CRISPR nucleases will unlock numerous genome editing and delivery challenges that constrain genetic engineering and crop development. In this study, we assessed the archaeal miniature Un1Cas12f1 type‐V CRISPR nuclease for genome editing in rice and tomato protoplasts. By adopting the reengineered guide RNA modifications ge4.1 and comparing polymerase II (Pol II) and polymerase III (Pol III) promoters, we demonstrated uncultured archaeon Cas12f1 (Un1Cas12f1) genome editing efficacy in rice and tomato protoplasts. We characterized the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) requirements and mutation profiles of Un1Cas12f1 in both plant species. Interestingly, we found that Pol III promoters, not Pol II promoters, led to higher genome editing efficiency when they were used to drive guide RNA expression. Unlike in mammalian cells, the engineered Un1Cas12f1‐RRA variant did not perform better than the wild‐type Un1Cas12f1 nuclease, suggesting continued protein engineering and other innovative approaches are needed to further improve Un1Cas12f1 genome editing in plants. 

Abstract Adenine base editors (ABEs) are valuable, precise genome editing tools in plants. In recent years, the highly promising ADENINE BASE EDITOR8e (ABE8e) was reported for efficient A-to-G editing. However, compared to monocots, comprehensive off-target analyses for ABE8e are lacking in dicots. To determine the occurrence of off-target effects in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), we assessed ABE8e and a high-fidelity version, ABE8e-HF, at 2 independent target sites in protoplasts, as well as stable T0 lines. Since ABE8e demonstrated higher on-target efficiency than ABE8e-HF in tomato protoplasts, we focused on ABE8e for off-target analyses in T0 lines. We conducted whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of wild-type (WT) tomato plants, green fluorescent protein (GFP)–expressing T0 lines, ABE8e-no-gRNA control T0 lines, and edited T0 lines. No guide RNA (gRNA)–dependent off-target edits were detected. Our data showed an average of approximately 1,200 to 1,500 single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) in either GFP control plants or base-edited plants. Also, no specific enrichment of A-to-G mutations were found in base-edited plants. We also conducted RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of the same 6 base-edited and 3 GFP control T0 plants. On average, approximately 150 RNA–level SNVs were discovered per plant for either base-edited or GFP controls. Furthermore, we did not find enrichment of a TA motif on mutated adenine in the genomes and transcriptomes in base-edited tomato plants, as opposed to the recent discovery in rice (Oryza sativa). Hence, we could not find evidence for genome- and transcriptome-wide off-target effects by ABE8e in tomato. 

Abstract CRISPR/Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR‐associated protein)‐mediated genome editing has revolutionized fundamental research and plant breeding. Beyond gene editing, CRISPR/Cas systems have been repurposed as a platform for programmable transcriptional regulation. Catalytically inactive Cas variants (dCas), when fused with transcriptional activation domains, allow for specific activation of any target gene in the genome without inducing DNA double‐strand breaks. CRISPR activation enables simultaneous activation of multiple genes, holding great promise in the identification of gene regulatory networks and rewiring of metabolic pathways. Here, we describe a simple protocol for constructing a dCas9‐mediated multiplexed gene activation system based on the CRISPR‐Act3.0 system. The resulting vectors are tested in rice protoplasts. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: sgRNA design and construction of CRISPR‐Act3.0 vectors for multiplexed gene activation Basic Protocol 2: Determining the activation efficiency of CRISPR‐Act3.0 vectors using rice protoplasts 

Summary Cytosine base editors (CBEs) are great additions to the expanding genome editing toolbox. To improve C‐to‐T base editing in plants, we first compared seven cytidine deaminases in the BE3‐like configuration in rice. We found A3A/Y130F‐CBE_V01 resulted in the highest C‐to‐T base editing efficiency in both rice andArabidopsis. Furthermore, we demonstrated this A3A/Y130F cytidine deaminase could be used to improve iSpyMacCas9‐mediated C‐to‐T base editing at A‐rich PAMs. To showcase its applications, we first applied A3A/Y130F‐CBE_V01 for multiplexed editing to generate microRNA‐resistant mRNA transcripts as well as pre‐mature stop codons in multiple seed trait genes. In addition, we harnessed A3A/Y130F‐CBE_V01 for efficient artificial evolution of novelALSandEPSPSalleles which conferred herbicide resistance in rice. To further improve C‐to‐T base editing, multiple CBE_V02, CBE_V03 and CBE_V04 systems were developed and tested in rice protoplasts. The CBE_V04 systems were found to have improved editing activity and purity with focal recruitment of more uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitors (UGIs) by the engineered single guide RNA 2.0 scaffold. Finally, we used whole‐genome sequencing (WGS) to compare six CBE_V01 systems and four CBE_V04 systems for genome‐wide off‐target effects in rice. Different levels of cytidine deaminase‐dependent and sgRNA‐independent off‐target effects were indeed revealed by WGS among edited lines by these CBE systems. We also investigated genome‐wide sgRNA‐dependent off‐target effects by different CBEs in rice. This comprehensive study compared 21 different CBE systems, and benchmarked PmCDA1‐CBE_V04 and A3A/Y130F‐CBE_V04 as next‐generation plant CBEs with high editing efficiency, purity, and specificity.