Search for: All records

Abstract A three‐component coupling approach toward structurally complex dialkylsulfides is described via the nickel‐catalyzed 1,2‐carbosulfenylation of unactivated alkenes with organoboron nucleophiles and alkylsulfenamide (N−S) electrophiles. Efficient catalytic turnover is facilitated using a tailored N−S electrophile containing anN‐methyl methanesulfonamide leaving group, allowing catalyst loadings as low as 1 mol %. Regioselectivity is controlled by a collection of monodentate, weakly coordinating native directing groups, including sulfonamides, amides, sulfinamides, phosphoramides, and carbamates. Key to the development of this transformation is the identification of quinones as a family of hemilabile and redox‐active ligands that tune the steric and electronic properties of the metal throughout the catalytic cycle. Density functional theory (DFT) results show that the duroquinone (DQ) ligand adopts different coordination modes in different stages of the Ni‐catalyzed 1,2‐carbosulfenylation‐binding as an η⁶capping ligand to stabilize the precatalyst/resting state and prevent catalyst decomposition, binding as an X‐type redox‐active durosemiquinone radical anion to promote alkene migratory insertion with a less distorted square planar Ni(II) center, and binding as an L‐type ligand to promote N−S oxidative addition at a relatively more electron‐rich Ni(I) center. 

Abstract Catalytic enantioselective 1,2-dicarbofunctionalization (1,2-DCF) of alkenes is a powerful transformation of growing importance in organic synthesis for constructing chiral building blocks, bioactive molecules, and agrochemicals. Both in a two- and three-component context, this family of reactions generates densely functionalized, structurally complex products in a single step. Across several distinct mechanistic pathways at play in these transformations with nickel or palladium catalysts, stereocontrol can be obtained through tailored chiral ligands. In this Review we discuss the various strategies, mechanisms, and catalysts that have been applied to achieve enantioinduction in alkene 1,2-DCF. 1 Introduction 2 Two-Component Enantioselective 1,2-DCF via Migratory Insertion 3 Two-Component Enantioselective 1,2-DCF via Radical Capture 4 Three-Component Enantioselective 1,2-DCF via Radical Capture 5 Three-Component Enantioselective 1,2-DCF via Migratory Insertion 6 Miscellaneous Mechanisms 7 Conclusion 

Abstract Because internal alkenes are more challenging synthetic targets than terminal alkenes, metal‐catalyzed olefin mono‐transposition (i.e., positional isomerization) approaches have emerged to afford valuableE‐ orZ‐internal alkenes from their complementary terminal alkene feedstocks. However, the applicability of these methods has been hampered by lack of generality, commercial availability of precatalysts, and scalability. Here, we report a nickel‐catalyzed platform for the stereodivergentE/Z‐selective synthesis of internal alkenes at room temperature. Commercial reagents enable this one‐carbon transposition of terminal alkenes to valuableE‐ orZ‐internal alkenes via a Ni−H‐mediated insertion/elimination mechanism. Though the mechanistic regime is the same in both systems, the underlying pathways that lead to each of the active catalysts are distinct, with theZ‐selective catalyst forming from comproportionation of an oxidative addition complex followed by oxidative addition with substrate and theE‐selective catalyst forming from protonation of the metal by the trialkylphosphonium salt additive. In each case, ligand sterics and denticity control stereochemistry and prevent over‐isomerization. 

Abstract Over the last fifty years, the use of nickel catalysts for facilitating organic transformations has skyrocketed. Nickel(0) sources act as useful precatalysts because they can enter a catalytic cycle through ligand exchange, without needing to undergo additional elementary steps. However, most Ni(0) precatalysts are synthesized with stoichiometric aluminum–hydride reductants, pyrophoric reagents that are not atom‐economical and must be used at cryogenic temperatures. Here, we demonstrate that Ni(II) salts can be reduced on preparative scale using electrolysis to yield a variety of Ni(0) and Ni(II) complexes that are widely used as precatalysts in organic synthesis, including bis(1,5‐cyclooctadiene)nickel(0) [Ni(COD)₂]. This method overcomes the reproducibility issues of previously reported methods by standardizing the procedure, such that it can be performed anywhere in a robust manner. It can be transitioned to large scale through an electrochemical recirculating flow process and extended to an in situ reduction protocol to generate catalytic amounts of Ni(0) for organic transformations. We anticipate that this work will accelerate adoption of preparative electrochemistry for the synthesis of low‐valent organometallic complexes in academia and industry. 

Abstract There is a pressing need, particularly in the field of drug discovery, for general methods that will enable direct coupling of tertiary alkyl fragments to (hetero)aryl halides. Herein a uniquely powerful and simple set of conditions for achieving this transformation with unparalleled generality and chemoselectivity is disclosed. This new protocol is placed in context with other recently reported methods, applied to simplify the routes of known bioactive building blocks molecules, and scaled up in both batch and flow. The role of pyridine additive as well as the mechanism of this reaction are interrogated through Cyclic Voltammetry studies, titration experiments, control reactions with Ni(0) and Ni(II)‐complexes, and ligand optimization data. Those studies indicate that the formation of a BINAPNi(0) is minimized and the formation of an active pyridine‐stabilized Ni(I) species is sustained during the reaction. Our preliminary mechanistic studies ruled out the involvement of Ni(0) species in this electrochemical cross‐coupling, which is mediated by Ni(I) species via a Ni(I)‐Ni(II)‐Ni(III)‐Ni(I) catalytic cycle. 

Abstract A flurry of recent research has centered on harnessing the power of nickel catalysis in organic synthesis. These efforts have been bolstered by contemporaneous development of well‐defined nickel (pre)catalysts with diverse structure and reactivity. In this report, we present ten different bench‐stable, 18‐electron, formally zero‐valent nickel–olefin complexes that are competent pre‐catalysts in various reactions. Our investigation includes preparations of novel, bench‐stable Ni(COD)(L) complexes (COD=1,5‐cyclooctadiene), in which L=quinone, cyclopentadienone, thiophene‐S‐oxide, and fulvene. Characterization by NMR, IR, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, thermogravimetric analysis, and natural bond orbital analysis sheds light on the structure, bonding, and properties of these complexes. Applications in an assortment of nickel‐catalyzed reactions underscore the complementary nature of the different pre‐catalysts within this toolkit.