Search for: All records

Programming languages are essential tools for developers, and their evolution plays a crucial role in supporting the activities of developers. One instance of programming language evolution is the introduction of syntactic sugars, which are additional syntax elements that provide alternative, more readable code constructs. However, the process of designing and evolving a programming language has traditionally been guided by anecdotal experiences and intuition. Recent advances in tools and methodologies for mining open-source repositories have enabled developers to make data-driven software engineering decisions. In light of this, this paper proposes an approach for motivating data-driven programming evolution by applying frequent subgraph mining techniques to a large dataset of 166,827,154 open-source Java methods. The dataset is mined by generalizing Java control-flow graphs to capture broad programming language usages and instances of duplication. Frequent subgraphs are then extracted to identify potentially impactful opportunities for new syntactic sugars. Our diverse results demonstrate the benefits of the proposed technique by identifying new syntactic sugars involving a variety of programming constructs that could be implemented in Java, thus simplifying frequent code idioms. This approach can potentially provide valuable insights for Java language designers, and serve as a proof-of-concept for data-driven programming language design and evolution. 

Recent work has shown that Machine Learning (ML) programs are error-prone and called for contracts for ML code. Contracts, as in the design by contract methodology, help document APIs and aid API users in writing correct code. The question is: what kinds of contracts would provide the most help to API users? We are especially interested in what kinds of contracts help API users catch errors at earlier stages in the ML pipeline. We describe an empirical study of posts on Stack Overflow of the four most often-discussed ML libraries: TensorFlow, Scikit-learn, Keras, and PyTorch. For these libraries, our study extracted 413 informal (English) API specifications. We used these specifications to understand the following questions. What are the root causes and effects behind ML contract violations? Are there common patterns of ML contract violations? When does understanding ML contracts require an advanced level of ML software expertise? Could checking contracts at the API level help detect the violations in early ML pipeline stages? Our key findings are that the most commonly needed contracts for ML APIs are either checking constraints on single arguments of an API or on the order of API calls. The software engineering community could employ existing contract mining approaches to mine these contracts to promote an increased understanding of ML APIs. We also noted a need to combine behavioral and temporal contract mining approaches. We report on categories of required ML contracts, which may help designers of contract languages. 

We present a new annotated microscopic cellular image dataset to improve the effectiveness of machine learning methods for cellular image analysis. Cell counting is an important step in cell analysis. Typically, domain experts manually count cells in a microscopic image. Automated cell counting can potentially eliminate this tedious, time-consuming process. However, a good, labeled dataset is required for training an accurate machine learning model. Our dataset includes microscopic images of cells, and for each image, the cell count and the location of individual cells. The data were collected as part of an ongoing study investigating the potential of electrical stimulation to modulate stem cell differentiation and possible applications for neural repair. Compared to existing publicly available datasets, our dataset has more images of cells stained with more variety of antibodies (protein components of immune responses against invaders) typically used for cell analysis. The experimental results on this dataset indicate that none of the five existing models under this study are able to achieve sufficiently accurate count to replace the manual methods. The dataset is available at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Dataset/21970604.