Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract The asymptotic Dirichlet‐to‐Neumann (D‐N) map is constructed for a class of scalar, constant coefficient, linear, third‐order, dispersive equations with asymptotically time/periodic Dirichlet boundary data and zero initial data on the half‐line, modeling a wavemaker acting upon an initially quiescent medium. The large time asymptotics for the special cases of the linear Korteweg‐de Vries and linear Benjamin–Bona–Mahony (BBM) equations are obtained. The D‐N map is proven to be unique if and only if the radiation condition that selects the unique wave number branch of the dispersion relation for a sinusoidal, time‐dependent boundary condition holds: (i) for frequencies in a finite interval, the wave number is real and corresponds to positive group velocity, and (ii) for frequencies outside the interval, the wave number is complex with positive imaginary part. For fixed spatial location , the corresponding asymptotic solution is (i) a traveling wave or (ii) a spatially decaying, time‐periodic wave. The linearized BBM asymptotics are found to quantitatively agree with viscous core‐annular fluid experiments.more » « less
-
Abstract We establish local well‐posedness in the sense of Hadamard for a certain third‐order nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a multiterm linear part and a general power nonlinearity, known as higher‐order nonlinear Schrödinger equation, formulated on the half‐line . We consider the scenario of associated coefficients such that only one boundary condition is required and hence assume a general nonhomogeneous boundary datum of Dirichlet type at . Our functional framework centers around fractional Sobolev spaces with respect to the spatial variable. We treat both high regularity () and low regularity () solutions: in the former setting, the relevant nonlinearity can be handled via the Banach algebra property; in the latter setting, however, this is no longer the case and, instead, delicate Strichartz estimates must be established. This task is especially challenging in the framework of nonhomogeneous initial‐boundary value problems, as it involves proving boundary‐type Strichartz estimates that are not common in the study of Cauchy (initial value) problems. The linear analysis, which forms the core of this work, crucially relies on a weak solution formulation defined through the novel solution formulae obtained via the Fokas method (also known as the unified transform) for the associated forced linear problem. In this connection, we note that the higher‐order Schrödinger equation comes with an increased level of difficulty due to the presence of more than one spatial derivatives in the linear part of the equation. This feature manifests itself via several complications throughout the analysis, including (i) analyticity issues related to complex square roots, which require careful treatment of branch cuts and deformations of integration contours; (ii) singularities that emerge upon changes of variables in the Fourier analysis arguments; and (iii) complicated oscillatory kernels in the weak solution formula for the linear initial‐boundary value problem, which require a subtle analysis of the dispersion in terms of the regularity of the boundary data. The present work provides a first, complete treatment via the Fokas method of a nonhomogeneous initial‐boundary value problem for a partial differential equation associated with a multiterm linear differential operator.more » « less
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available August 3, 2027
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 21, 2027
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 1, 2027
-
The question of well-posedness of the generalized focusing Ablowitz-Ladik (AL) and discrete nonlinear Schrödinger (DNLS) equations with nonzero boundary conditions on the infinite lattice is far less understood than in the case where the models are supplemented with vanishing boundary conditions. This question remains largely unexplored even in the standard case of cubic nonlinearities in which, in particular, the AL equation is completely integrable while the DNLS equation is not (in contrast with its continuous counterpart). We establish local well-posedness for both of these generalized nonlinear systems supplemented with a broad class of nonzero boundary conditions and, in addition, derive analytical upper bounds for the minimal guaranteed lifespan of their solutions. These bounds depend explicitly on the norm of the initial data, the background, and the nonlinearity exponents. In particular, they suggest the possibility of finite-time collapse (blow-up) of solutions. Furthermore, by comparing models with different nonlinearity exponents, we prove estimates for the distance between their respective solutions (measured in suitable metrics), valid up to their common minimal guaranteed lifespan. Highly accurate numerical studies illustrate that solutions of the generalized AL equation may collapse in finite time. Importantly, the numerically observed blow-up time is in excellent agreement with the theoretically predicted order of the minimal guaranteed lifespan. Furthermore, in the case of the DNLS equation on a finite lattice we prove global existence of solutions; this is consistent with our numerical observations of the phenomenon of quasi-collapse, manifested by narrow oscillatory spikes that nevertheless persist throughout time. Once again, the time of the emergence of this phenomenon is in excellent agreement with the theoretically established minimal guaranteed lifespan. Notably, our numerical simulations confirm our theoretical result on the proximity of the dynamics between the two models over time scales up to the common solution lifespan. Finally, for power nonlinearities, we prove the asymptotic equivalence between the two discrete models in the continuous limit.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available March 30, 2027
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available March 1, 2027
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 31, 2026
An official website of the United States government
