More Like this

1. Ascertaining Intergovernmental Coordination Mechanisms

   https://doi.org/10.5064/F6QHVGUI  

   Milman, Anita; Milman, Anita (January 2023, QDR Main Collection)

   Project Overview Jurisdictional boundaries of governmental agencies often do not align with the geographic or social boundaries of the policy issues they are tasked with addressing. This spatial mismatch is especially common in relation to natural resources and the environment. Where it occurs, achievement of policy goals may require coordination across jurisdictions, which can lead to mutual benefits. Yet, governmental agencies may view coordination as costly or as leading to a loss of autonomy. This project examined coordination decisions made by local level governmental agencies in California, as they formed Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) and subsequently coordinated development of their first groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs) under California's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). The project addresses the question of how agencies make decisions and manage interactions when under a coordination mandate that allots agencies the discretion to decide how to coordinate. More specifically, it investigates:What factors influence decisions regarding the geographic extent of and parties involved in development of new formal agencies for groundwater management,How do concerns about the potential risks of coordination affect the choice of coordination mechanisms,How does the structure of agency interactions affect their achievement of the objectives of the coordination mandate, andHow do agencies make sense of a coordination mandate and how does that sense-making process influence the decisions agencies make when deciding how to respond to the mandate? 

   more » « less
2. Socio-technical coordination (keynote)

   https://doi.org/10.1145/2591062.2600729  

   Herbsleb, James (January 2014, International Conference on Software Engineering)

   Product architecture structures the coordination problem that the development organization must solve. The modularity strategy establishes design rules that fix module functionality and interfaces, and assigns development work for each module to a single team. The modules present relatively independent coordination problems that teams attempt to solve with all the traditional coordination mechanisms available to them. The applicability and effectiveness of this strategy is limited with increasing technical and organizational volatility. In the absence of theory explaining why and when modularity works, the technique is brittle, with very little firm basis for adjustment or for complementing it with other strategies. I present a theory of coordination, based on decision networks, that generalizes the modularity strategy. I review evidence testing several hypotheses derived from the theory, and explore how this theoretical view can drive coordination research and provide a theoretical basis for practical techniques to assist architects, developers, and managers. 

   more » « less
3. Neutron Instruments for Research in Coordination Chemistry: Neutron Instruments for Research in Coordination Chemistry

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201801076  

   Xue, Zi-Ling; Ramirez-Cuesta, Anibal J.; Brown, Craig M.; Calder, Stuart; Cao, Huibo; Chakoumakos, Bryan C.; Daemen, Luke L.; Huq, Ashfia; Kolesnikov, Alexander I.; Mamontov, Eugene; et al (February 2019, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry)
4. Crowdsourced coordination through online games

   https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451839  

   Tavakoli, Arash; Nalbandian, Haig; Ayanian, Nora (March 2016, 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction)
5. Strong Coordination Over Noisy Channels

   https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2021.3063140  

   Obead, Sarah A.; Vellambi, Badri N.; Kliewer, Jorg (May 2021, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory)