An official website of the United States government
Analyzing different modalities of expression can provide insights into the ways that humans interpret, label, and react to images. Such insights have the potential not only to advance our understanding of how humans coordinate these expressive modalities but also to enhance existing methodologies for common AI tasks such as image annotation and classification. We conducted an experiment that co-captured the facial expressions, eye movements, and spoken language data that observers produce while examining images of varying emotional content and responding to description-oriented vs. affect-oriented questions about those images. We analyzed the facial expressions produced by the observers in order to determine the connection between those expressions and an image's emotional content. We also explored the relationship between the valence of an image and the verbal responses to that image, and how that relationship relates to the nature of the prompt, using low-level lexical features and more complex affective features extracted from the observers' verbal responses. Finally, in order to integrate this multimodal data, we extended an existing bitext alignment framework to create meaningful pairings between narrated observations about images and the image regions indicated by eye movement data. The resulting annotations of image regions with words from observers' responses demonstrate the potential of bitext alignment for multimodal data integration and, from an application perspective, for annotation of open-domain images. In addition, we found that while responses to affect-oriented questions appear useful for image understanding, their holistic nature seems less helpful for image region annotation.
more »
« less
Multimodal Alignment for Affective Content
Humans routinely extract important information from images and videos, relying on their gaze. In contrast, computational systems still have difficulty annotating important visual information in a human-like manner, in part because human gaze is often not included in the modeling process. Human input is also particularly relevant for processing and interpreting affective visual information. To address this challenge, we captured human gaze, spoken language, and facial expressions simultaneously in an experiment with visual stimuli characterized by subjective and affective content. Observers described the content of complex emotional images and videos depicting positive and negative scenarios and also their feelings about the imagery being viewed. We explore patterns of these modalities, for example by comparing the affective nature of participant-elicited linguistic tokens with image valence. Additionally, we expand a framework for generating automatic alignments between the gaze and spoken language modalities for visual annotation of images. Multimodal alignment is challenging due to their varying temporal offset. We explore alignment robustness when images have affective content and whether image valence influences alignment results. We also study if word frequency-based filtering impacts results, with both the unfiltered and filtered scenarios performing better than baseline comparisons, and with filtering resulting in a substantial decrease in alignment error rate. We provide visualizations of the resulting annotations from multimodal alignment. This work has implications for areas such as image understanding, media accessibility, and multimodal data fusion.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1559889
- PAR ID:
- 10067981
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- AAAI Workshop on Affective Content Analysis
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 21-28
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
People who are blind share their images and videos with companies that provide visual assistance technologies (VATs) to gain access to information about their surroundings. A challenge is that people who are blind cannot independently validate the content of the images and videos before they share them, and their visual data commonly contains private content. We examine privacy concerns for blind people who share personal visual data with VAT companies that provide descriptions authored by humans or artifcial intelligence (AI) . We frst interviewed 18 people who are blind about their perceptions of privacy when using both types of VATs. Then we asked the participants to rate 21 types of image content according to their level of privacy concern if the information was shared knowingly versus unknowingly with human- or AI-powered VATs. Finally, we analyzed what information VAT companies communicate to users about their collection and processing of users’ personal visual data through their privacy policies. Our fndings have implications for the development of VATs that safeguard blind users’ visual privacy, and our methods may be useful for other camera-based technology companies and their users.more » « less
-
Abstract Most of the research in the field of affective computing has focused on detecting and classifying human emotions through electroencephalogram (EEG) or facial expressions. Designing multimedia content to evoke certain emotions has been largely motivated by manual rating provided by users. Here we present insights from the correlation of affective features between three modalities namely, affective multimedia content, EEG, and facial expressions. Interestingly, low-level Audio-visual features such as contrast and homogeneity of the video and tone of the audio in the movie clips are most correlated with changes in facial expressions and EEG. We also detect the regions associated with the human face and the brain (in addition to the EEG frequency bands) that are most representative of affective responses. The computational modeling between the three modalities showed a high correlation between features from these regions and user-reported affective labels. Finally, the correlation between different layers of convolutional neural networks with EEG and Face images as input provides insights into human affection. Together, these findings will assist in (1) designing more effective multimedia contents to engage or influence the viewers, (2) understanding the brain/body bio-markers of affection, and (3) developing newer brain-computer interfaces as well as facial-expression-based algorithms to read emotional responses of the viewers.more » « less
-
This study explores the affective responses and newsworthiness perceptions of generative AI for visual journalism. While generative AI offers advantages for newsrooms in terms of producing unique images and cutting costs, the potential misuse of AI-generated news images is a cause for concern. For our study, we designed a 3-part news image codebook for affect-labeling news images based on journalism ethics and photography guidelines. We collected 200 news headlines and images retrieved from a variety of U.S. news sources on the topics of gun violence and climate change, generated corresponding news images from DALL-E 2 and asked annotators their emotional responses to the human-selected and AI-generated news images following the codebook. We also examined the impact of modality on emotions by measuring the effects of visual and textual modalities on emotional responses. The findings of this study provide insights into the quality and emotional impact of generative news images produced by humans and AI. Further, results of this work can be useful in developing technical guidelines as well as policy measures for the ethical use of generative AI systems in journalistic production. The codebook, images and annotations are made publicly available to facilitate future research in affective computing, specifically tailored to civic and public-interest journalism.more » « less
-
Identifying persuasive speakers in an adversarial environment is a critical task. In a national election, politicians would like to have persuasive speakers campaign on their behalf. When a company faces adverse publicity, they would like to engage persuasive advocates for their position in the presence of adversaries who are critical of them. Debates represent a common platform for these forms of adversarial persuasion. This paper solves two problems: the Debate Outcome Prediction (DOP) problem predicts who wins a debate while the Intensity of Persuasion Prediction (IPP) problem predicts the change in the number of votes before and after a speaker speaks. Though DOP has been previously studied, we are the first to study IPP. Past studies on DOP fail to leverage two important aspects of multimodal data: 1) multiple modalities are often semantically aligned, and 2) different modalities may provide diverse information for prediction. Our M2P2 (Multimodal Persuasion Prediction) framework is the first to use multimodal (acoustic, visual, language) data to solve the IPP problem. To leverage the alignment of different modalities while maintaining the diversity of the cues they provide, M2P2 devises a novel adaptive fusion learning framework which fuses embeddings obtained from two modules -- an alignment module that extracts shared information between modalities and a heterogeneity module that learns the weights of different modalities with guidance from three separately trained unimodal reference models. We test M2P2 on the popular IQ2US dataset designed for DOP. We also introduce a new dataset called QPS (from Qipashuo, a popular Chinese debate TV show) for IPP - we plan to release this dataset when the paper is published. M2P2 significantly outperforms 3 recent baselines on both datasets.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
