skip to main content


Title: The Resistivity Size Effect in Epitaxial Ru(0001) and Co(0001) Layers
Ru(0001) and Co(0001) films with thickness d ranging from 5 to 300 nm are sputter deposited onto Al2O3(0001) substrates in order to quantify and compare the resistivity size effect. Both metals form epitaxial single crystal layers with their basal planes parallel to the substrate surface and exhibit a root-mean-square roughness < 0.4 nm for Ru and < 0.9 nm for Co. Transport measurements on these layers have negligible resistance contributions from roughness and grain boundary scattering which allows direct quantification of electron surface scattering. The measured resistivity ρ vs d is well described by the classical Fuchs-Sondheimer model, indicating a mean free path for transport within the basal plane of λ = 6.7 ± 0.3 nm for Ru and λ = 19.5 ± 1.0 nm for Co. Bulk Ru is 36% more resistive than Co; in contrast, Ru(0001) layers with d ≤ 25 nm are more conductive than Co(0001) layers, which is attributed to the shorter λ for Ru. The determined λ-values are utilized in combination with the Fuchs-Sondheimer and Mayadas-Shatzkes models to predict and compare the resistance of polycrystalline interconnect lines, assuming a grain boundary reflection coefficient R = 0.4 and accounting for the thinner barrier/adhesion layers available to Ru and Co metallizations. This results in predicted 10 nm half-pitch line resistances for Ru, Co, and Cu of 1.0, 2.2, and 2.1 kΩ/µm, respectively.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1740271 1712752
PAR ID:
10089436
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2018 IEEE Nanotechnology Symposium (ANTS), Albany, NY, 2018
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1 to 5
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Co electrodeposition was performed onto single crystal Ru(0001) and polycrystalline Ru films to study the influence of such seed layers on the growth of epitaxial Co(0001). The effect of misfit strain on the electrodeposited Co(0001) films was studied using 60 and 10 nm-thick Ru(0001) seed layers, where the misfit strains of the Co layer on the two Ru(0001) seed layers are 7.9% and 9.6%, respectively. Despite a large misfit strain of 7.9%, the planar growth of Co(0001) was achieved up to a thickness of 42 nm before a transition to island growth was observed. Epitaxial Co films electrodeposited onto 10 nm Ru(0001) showed increased roughness when compared with Co electrodeposited onto the 60 nm seed layer. Co electrodeposition onto polycrystalline Ru resulted in a rough, polycrystalline film with faceted growth. Electrochemical experiments and simulations were used to study the influence of [Co2+] and solution pH on the throughput of the electrodeposition process. By increasing [Co2+] from 1 to 20 mM, the deposition rate of Co(0001) increased from 0.23 nm min−1to 0.88 nm min−1at an applied current density of −80μA cm−2.

     
    more » « less
  2. The contact resistance at metal-metal (W, Mo, Ru, Co, TiN) interfaces is determined using a new method based on blanket superlattice thin films where the resistivity ρ parallel to the interfaces is measured as a function of superlattice period Λ to quantify the electron interface scattering. Epitaxial W(001)/Mo(001) superlattices show a continuous resistivity increase from 7.10 to 8.62 µΩ-cm with decreasing Λ = 50-1.7 nm, indicating a contact resistance of 2.6×10-16 Ω-m2. Ru/Co multilayers show a much more pronounced increase from 15.0 to 47.5 µΩ-cm with Λ = 60-2 nm which is attributed to atomic intermixing leading to an interfacial Ru-Co alloy with a high measured ρ = 61 µΩ-cm and a Ru-Co contact resistance for interfaces deposited at 400 °C of 9.1 ×10-15 Ω-m2. Ru/TiN and Co/TiN interface resistances are dominated by the high ρ for TiN, and are therefore proportional to the TiN thickness. 
    more » « less
  3. This work outlines conditions suitable for the heteroepitaxial growth of Cr2O3(0001) films (1.5–20 nm thick) on a Ru(0001)-terminated substrate. Optimized growth is achieved by sputter deposition of Cr within a 4 mTorr Ar/O2 20% ambient at Ru temperatures ranging from 450 to 600 °C. The Cr2O3 film adopts a 30° rotated honeycomb configuration with respect to the underlying Ru(0001) substrate and exhibits a hexagonal lattice parameter consistent with that for bulk Cr2O3(0001). Heating to 700 °C within the same environment during film preparation leads to Ru oxidation. Exposure to temperatures at or above 400 °C in a vacuum, Ar, or Ar/H2 3% leads to chromia film degradation characterized by increased Ru 3d XPS intensity coupled with concomitant Cr 2p and O 1s peak attenuations when compared to data collected from unannealed films. An ill-defined but hexagonally well-ordered RuxCryOz surface structure is noted after heating the film in this manner. Heating within a wet Ar/H2 3% environment preserves the Cr2O3(0001)/Ru(0001) heterolayer structure to temperatures of at least 950 °C. Heating an Ru–Cr2O3–Ru heterostacked film to 950 °C within this environment is shown by cross-sectional scanning/transmission electron microscopy (S/TEM) to provide clear evidence of retained epitaxial bicrystalline oxide interlayer structure, interlayer immiscibility, and epitaxial registry between the top and bottom Ru layers. Subtle effects marked by O enrichment and O 1s and Cr 2p shifts to increased binding energies are noted by XPS in the near-Ru regions of Cr2O3(0001)/Ru(0001) and Ru(0001)/Cr2O3(0001)/Ru(0001) films after annealing to different temperatures in different sets of environmental conditions.

     
    more » « less
  4. With the advances in nanofabrication technology, horizontally aligned and well-defined nitrogen-doped ultrananocrystalline diamond nanostripes can be fabricated with widths in the order of tens of nanometers. The study of the size-dependent electron transport properties of these nanostructures is crucial to novel electronic and electrochemical applications. In this paper, 100 nm thick n-type ultrananocrystalline diamond thin films were synthesized by microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition method with 5% N2 gas in the plasma during the growth process. Then the nanostripes were fabricated using standard electron beam lithography and reactive ion etching techniques. The electrical transport properties of the free-standing single nanostripes of different widths from 75 to 150 nm and lengths from 1 to 128 μm were investigated. The study showed that the electrical resistivity of the n-type ultrananocrystalline diamond nanostripes increased dramatically with the decrease in the nanostripe width. The nanostripe resistivity was nearly doubted when the width was reduced from 150 nm to 75 nm. The size-dependent variability in conductivity could originate from the imposed diffusive scattering of the nanostripe surfaces which had a further compounding effect to reinforce the grain boundary scattering. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Metal‐assisted electrochemical nanoimprinting (Mac‐Imprint) scales the fabrication of micro‐ and nanoscale 3D freeform geometries in silicon and holds the promise to enable novel chip‐scale optics operating at the near‐infrared spectrum. However, Mac‐Imprint of silicon concomitantly generates mesoscale roughness (e.g., protrusion size ≈45 nm) creating prohibitive levels of light scattering. This arises from the requirement to coat stamps with nanoporous gold catalyst that, while sustaining etchant diffusion, imprints its pores (e.g., average diameter ≈42 nm) onto silicon. In this work, roughness is reduced to sub‐10 nm levels, which is in par with plasma etching, by decreasing pore size of the catalyst via dealloying in far‐from equilibrium conditions. At this level, single‐digit nanometric details such as grain‐boundary grooves of the catalyst are imprinted and attributed to the resolution limit of Mac‐Imprint, which is argued to be twice the Debye length (i.e., 1.7 nm)—a finding that broadly applies to metal‐assisted chemical etching. Last, Mac‐Imprint is employed to produce single‐mode rib‐waveguides on pre‐patterned silicon‐on‐insulator wafers with root‐mean‐square line‐edge roughness less than 10 nm while providing depth uniformity (i.e., 42.9 ± 5.5 nm), and limited levels of silicon defect formation (e.g., Raman peak shift < 0.1 cm−1) and sidewall scattering.

     
    more » « less