skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
Title: Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
To assess protistan grazing impact and temperature sensitivity on plankton population dynamics, we measured bulk and species-specific phytoplankton growth and herbivorous protist grazing rates in Disko Bay, West Greenland in April-May 2011. Rate estimates were made at three different temperatures in situ (0 °C), +3 °C and +6 °C over ambient. In situ Chlorophyll a (Chl a ) doubled during the observation period to ∼12  µg Chl a L −1 , with 60–97% of Chl a in the >20 µm size-fraction dominated by the diatom genus Chaetoceros. Herbivorous dinoflagellates comprised 60–80% of microplankton grazer biomass. At in situ temperatures, phytoplankton growth or grazing by herbivorous predators <200 µm was not measurable until 11 days after observations commenced. Thereafter, phytoplankton growth was on average 0.25 d −1 . Phytoplankton mortality due to herbivorous grazing was only measured on three occasions but the magnitude was substantial, up to 0.58 d −1 . Grazing of this magnitude removed ∼100% of primary production. In short-term temperature-shift incubation experiments, phytoplankton growth rate increased significantly (20%) at elevated temperatures. In contrast, herbivorous protist grazing and species-specific growth rates decreased significantly (50%) at +6 °C. This differential response in phytoplankton and herbivores to temperature increases resulted in a decrease of primary production removed with increasing temperature. Phaeocystis spp. abundance was negatively correlated with bulk grazing rate. Growth and grazing rates were variable but showed no evidence of an inherent, low temperature limitation. Herbivorous protist growth rates in this study and in a literature review were comparable to rates from temperate waters. Thus, an inherent physiological inhibition of protistan growth or grazing rates in polar waters is not supported by the data. The large variability between lack of grazing and high rates of primary production removal observed here and confirmed in the literature for polar waters implies larger amplitude fluctuations in phytoplankton biomass than slower, steady grazing losses of primary production.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1736635
NSF-PAR ID:
10096240
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
PeerJ
Volume:
6
ISSN:
2167-8359
Page Range / eLocation ID:
e5264
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Limnology and Oceanography)
    Abstract

    Marine microbial communities in coastal environments are subject to both seasonal fluctuations and anthropogenic alterations of environmental conditions. The separate influences of temperature and resource‐dependency on phytoplankton growth, community, and ecosystem metabolism are relatively well understood. However, winners and losers in the ocean are determined based on the interplay among often rapidly changing biological, chemical and physical drivers. The direct, indirect, and interactive effects of these conditions on planktonic food web structure and function are poorly constrained. Here, we investigated how simultaneous manipulation of temperature and nutrient availability affects trophic transfer from phytoplankton to herbivorous protists, and their resulting implications at the ecosystem level. Temperature directly affected herbivorous protist composition; ciliates dominated (66%) in colder treatment and dinoflagellates (60%) at warmer temperatures. Throughout the experiments, grazing rates were < 0.1 d−1, with higher rates at subzero temperatures. Overall, the nutrient–temperature interplay affected trophic transfer rates antagonistically when nutrients were amended, and synergistically, when nutrients were not added. This interaction resulted in higher percentages of primary production consumed under nutrient unamended compared to nutrient amended conditions. At the ecosystem level, these changes may determine the fate of primary production, with most of the production likely exported out of the pelagic zone in high‐temperature and nutrient conditions, while high‐temperature and low‐nutrient availability strengthened food web coupling and enhanced trophic transfer. These results imply that in warming oceans, management of coastal nutrient loading will be a critical determinant of the degree of primary production removal by microzooplankton and dependent ecosystem production.

     
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ( , Limnology and Oceanography)
    Abstract

    Herbivorous consumption of primary production is a key transformation in global biogeochemical cycles, directing matter and energy either to higher trophic levels, export production, or remineralization. Grazing by microzooplankton is often poorly constrained, particularly in dynamic coastal systems. Temperate coastal areas are seasonally and spatially variable, which presents both challenges and opportunities to identify patterns and drivers of grazing pressure. Here we report on two winter and one summer week‐long cruises (2018–2019), as part of the new Northeast U.S. Shelf Long‐Term Ecological Research program. During both seasons, coastal waters were colder and fresher, and had higher phytoplankton biomass than waters at the shelf break. The phytoplankton community was dominated by large cells in winter and by small cells in summer. Phytoplankton growth rates ranged from < 0.5 d−1in winter and up to 1.4 d−1in summer and were strongly correlated to temperature, to light availability, and to phytoplankton community size‐structure. Grazing rates were not correlated with total chlorophyll a, which points to other biological drivers, including species composition in predator‐prey interactions at the first trophic level. The percentage of primary production consumed (%PP) indicated higher trophic transfer in winter (%PP > 50%) than during summer (%PP < 20%), highlighting seasonal shifts in planktonic food web structure and function. These results imply that predictable shifts in environmental conditions can be linked to ecosystem shifts in net primary production. Hierarchies of variability, from localized to interannual and long‐term climate driven, can be understood within the context of sustained measurements of ecosystem properties and function.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ( , Marine Ecology Progress Series)
    null (Ed.)
    Low-latitude waters of the Indian Ocean are warming faster than other major oceans. Most models predict a zooplankton decline due to lower productivity, enhanced metabolism and phytoplankton size shifts that reduce trophic transfer efficiency. In May-June 2019, we investigated mesozooplankton biomass and grazing along the historic 110°E transect line from the International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) of the 1960s. Twenty sampling stations from 39.5 to 11.5°S spanned latitudinal variability from temperate to tropical waters and a pronounced 14°C gradient in mean euphotic zone temperature. Although mesozooplankton size structure was similar along the transect, with smaller (<2 mm) size classes dominant, total biomass increased 3-fold (400 to 1500 mg dry weight m -2 ) from high to low latitude. More dramatically, gut-fluorescence estimates of grazing (total ingestion or % euphotic zone chl a consumed d -1 ) were 14- and 20-fold higher, respectively, in the low-latitude warmer waters. Biomass-normalized grazing rates varied more than 6-fold over the transect, showing a strong temperature relationship (r 2 = 0.85) that exceeded the temperature effects on gut turnover and metabolic rates. Herbivory contributed more to satisfying zooplankton energetic requirements in low-chl a tropical waters than chl a -rich waters at higher latitude. Our unexpected results are inconsistent with trophic amplification of warming effects on phytoplankton to zooplankton, but might be explained by enhanced coupling efficiency via mixotrophy. Additional implications for selective herbivory and top-down grazing control underscore the need for rigorous field studies to understand relationships and validate assumptions about climate change effects on the food webs of tropical oceans. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ( , Limnology and Oceanography)
    Abstract

    We investigated competition betweenSalpa thompsoniand protistan grazers during Lagrangian experiments near the Subtropical Front in the southwest Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. Over a month, the salp community shifted from dominance by large (> 100 mm) oozooids and small (< 20 mm) blastozooids to large (~ 60 mm) blastozooids. Phytoplankton biomass was consistently dominated by nano‐ and microphytoplankton (> 2 μm cells). Using bead‐calibrated flow‐cytometry light scatter to estimate phytoplankton size, we quantified size‐specific salp and protistan zooplankton grazing pressure. Salps were able to feed at a > 10,000 : 1 predator : prey size (linear‐dimension) ratio. Small blastozooids efficiently retained cells > 1.4μm (high end of picoplankton size, 0.6–2 μm cells) and also obtained substantial nutrition from smaller bacteria‐sized cells. Larger salps could only feed efficiently on > 5.9μm cells and were largely incapable of feeding on picoplankton. Due to the high biomass of nano‐ and microphytoplankton, however, all salps derived most of their (phytoplankton‐based) nutrition from these larger autotrophs. Phagotrophic protists were the dominant competitors for these prey items and consumed approximately 50% of the biomass of all phytoplankton size classes each day. Using a Bayesian statistical framework, we developed an allometric‐scaling equation for salp clearance rates as a function of salp and prey size:urn:x-wiley:00243590:media:lno11770:lno11770-math-0001where ESD is prey equivalent spherical diameter (µm), TL isS. thompsonitotal length,φ = 5.6 × 10−3 ± 3.6 × 10−4,ψ = 2.1 ± 0.13,θ = 0.58 ± 0.08, andγ = 0.46 ± 0.03 and clearance rate is L d‐1salp‐1. We discuss the biogeochemical and food‐web implications of competitive interactions among salps, krill, and protozoans.

     
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ( , Marine Ecology Progress Series)
    null (Ed.)
    We investigated how the network of food-web flows in open-ocean systems might support high rates of mesozooplankton respiration and production by comparing predicted rates from empirical relationships to independently determined solutions from an inverse model based on tightly constrained field-measured rates for the equatorial Pacific. Model results were consistent with estimates of gross:net primary production (GPP:NPP), bacterial production:NPP, sinking particulate export, and total export for the equatorial Pacific, as well as general literature values for growth efficiencies of bacteria, protozooplankton, and metazooplankton. Mean rate estimates from the model compared favorably with the respiration predictions from Ikeda (1985; Mar Biol 85:1-11 ) (146 vs. 144 mg C m -2 d -1 , respectively) and with production estimates from the growth rate equation of Hirst & Sheader (1997; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 154:155-165 ) (153 vs. 144 mg C m -2 d -1 ). Metazooplankton nutritional requirements are met with a mixed diet of protozooplankton (39%), phytoplankton (36%), detritus (15%), and carnivory (10%). Within the food-web network, NPP of 896 mg C m -2 d -1 supports a total heterotrophic carbon demand from bacteria, protozoa, and metazooplankton that is 2.5 times higher. Scaling our results to primary production and zooplankton biomass at Stn ALOHA suggests that zooplankton nutritional requirements for high growth might similarly be met in oligotrophic subtropical waters through a less efficient trophic structure. Metazooplankton production available to higher-level consumers is a significant contributor to the total export needed for an overall biogeochemical balance of the region and to export requirements to meet carbon demand in the mesopelagic depth range. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email