More Like this

1. A Parallel 2/3-Approximation Algorithm for Vertex-Weighted Matching

   https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976229.2  

   Al-Herz, Ahmed ; Pothen, Alex ( January 2020 , SIAM 2020 Workshop on Combinatorial Scientific Computing)

   We consider the maximum vertex-weighted matching problem (MVM), in which non-negative weights are assigned to the vertices of a graph, and the weight of a matching is the sum of the weights of the matched vertices. Although exact algorithms for MVM are faster than exact algorithms for the maximum edge-weighted matching problem, there are graphs on which these exact algorithms could take hundreds of hours. For a natural number k, we design a k/(k + 1)approximation algorithm for MVM on non-bipartite graphs that updates the matching along certain short paths in the graph: either augmenting paths of length at most 2k + 1 or weight-increasing paths of length at most 2k. The choice of k = 2 leads to a 2/3-approximation algorithm that computes nearly optimal weights fast. This algorithm could be initialized with a 2/3-approximate maximum cardinality matching to reduce its runtime in practice. A 1/2-approximation algorithm may be obtained using k = 1, which is faster than the 2/3-approximation algorithm but it computes lower weights. The 2/3-approximation algorithm has time complexity O(Δ2m) while the time complexity of the 1/2-approximation algorithm is O(Δm), where m is the number of edges and Δ is the maximum degree of a vertex.more »Results from our serial implementations show that on average the 1/2-approximation algorithm runs faster than the Suitor algorithm (currently the fastest 1/2-approximation algorithm) while the 2/3-approximation algorithm runs as fast as the Suitor algorithm but obtains higher weights for the matching. One advantage of the proposed algorithms is that they are well-suited for parallel implementation since they can process vertices to match in any order. The 1/2- and 2/3-approximation algorithms have been implemented on a shared memory parallel computer, and both approximation algorithms obtain good speedups, while the former algorithm runs faster on average than the parallel Suitor algorithm. Care is needed to design the parallel algorithm to avoid cyclic waits, and we prove that it is live-lock free.« less
2. Scalable All-pairs Shortest Paths for Huge Graphs on Multi-GPU Clusters

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3431379.3460651  

   sao, Piyush ; lu, Hao ; Kannan, Ramakrishnan ; Thakkar, Vijay ; Vuduc, Richard ; Potok, Thomas ( June 2020 , HPDC '21: Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing)

   We present an optimized Floyd-Warshall (Floyd-Warshall) algorithm that computes the All-pairs shortest path (APSP) for GPU accelerated clusters. The Floyd-Warshall algorithm due to its structural similarities to matrix-multiplication is well suited for highly parallel GPU architectures. To achieve high parallel efficiency, we address two key algorithmic challenges: reducing high communication overhead and addressing limited GPU memory. To reduce high communication costs, we redesign the parallel (a) to expose more parallelism, (b) aggressively overlap communication and computation with pipelined and asynchronous scheduling of operations, and (c) tailored MPI-collective. To cope with limited GPU memory, we employ an offload model, where the data resides on the host and is transferred to GPU on-demand. The proposed optimizations are supported with detailed performance models for tuning. Our optimized parallel Floyd-Warshall implementation is up to 5x faster than a strong baseline and achieves 8.1 PetaFLOPS/sec on 256~nodes of the Summit supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This performance represents 70% of the theoretical peak and 80% parallel efficiency. The offload algorithm can handle 2.5x larger graphs with a 20% increase in overall running time.
3. Parallel Algorithms through Approximation: b-Edge cover

   https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2018.00013  

   Khan, Arif ; Pothen, Alex ; Ferdous, SM ( January 2018 , 2018 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium)

   We describe a paradigm for designing parallel algorithms via approximation, and illustrate it on the b-edgecover problem. A b-edgecover of minimum weight in a graph is a subset $C$ of its edges such that at least a specified number $b(v)$ of edges in $C$ is incident on each vertex $v$, and the sum of the edge weights in $C$ is minimum. The Greedy algorithm and a variant, the LSE algorithm, provide $3/2$-approximation guarantees in the worst-case for this problem, but these algorithms have limited parallelism. Hence we design two new $2$-approximation algorithms with greater concurrency. The MCE algorithm reduces the computation of a b-edgecover to that of finding a b'-matching, by exploiting the relationship between these subgraphs in an approximation context. The LSE-NW is derived from the LSEalgorithm using static edge weights rather than dynamically computing effective edge weights. This relaxation gives LSE a worse approximation guarantee but makes it more amenable to parallelization. We prove that both the MCE and LSE-NW algorithms compute the same b-edgecover with at most twice the weight of the minimum weight edge cover. In practice, the $2$-approximation and $3/2$-approximation algorithms compute edge covers of weight within $10\%$ the optimal. We implement three of themore »approximation algorithms, MCE, LSE, and LSE-NW on shared memory multi-core machines, including an Intel Xeon and an IBM Power8 machine with 8 TB memory. The MCE algorithm is the fastest of these by an order of magnitude or more. It computes an edge cover in a graph with billions of edges in $20$ seconds using two hundred threads on the IBM Power8. We also show that the parallel depth and work can be bounded for the Suitor and b-Suitor algorithms when edge weights are random.« less
4. Designing Scalable b-MATCHING Algorithms on Distributed Memory Multiprocessors by Approximation

   https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2016.65  

   Khan, Arif ; Pothen, Alex ; Patwary, Md. Mostofa ; Halappanavar, Mahantesh ; Satish, Nadathur Rajagopalan ; Sundaram, Narayanan ; Dubey, Pradeep ( November 2016 , Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference (SC16))

   A b-matching is a subset of edges M such that at most b(v) edges in M are incident on each vertex v, where b(v) is specified. We present a distributed-memory parallel algorithm, \bsuitor, that computes a b-matching with more than half the maximum weight in a graph with weights on the edges. The approximation algorithm is designed to have high concurrency and low time complexity. We organize the implementation of the algorithm in terms of asynchronous super-steps that combine computation and communication, and balance the computational work and frequency of communication to obtain high performance. Since the performance of the b-suitor algorithm is strongly influenced by communication, we present several strategies to reduce the communication volume. We implement the algorithm using a hybrid strategy where inter-node communication uses MPI and intra-node computation is done with OpenMP threads. We demonstrate strong and weak scaling of b-suitor up to 16,000 processors on two supercomputers at NERSC. We compute a b-matching in a graph with 2 billion edges in under 4 seconds using 16,000 processors.
5. Batched Predecessor and Sorting with Size-Priced Information in External Memory

   Bender, Michael ; Goswami, Mayank ; Medjedovic, Dzejla ; Montes, Pablo ; Tsichlas, Kostas ( January 2021 , Latin American Theoretical Informatics Symposium)

   In the unit-cost comparison model, a black box takes an input two items and outputs the result of the comparison. Problems like sorting and searching have been studied in this model, and it has been general- ized to include the concept of priced information, where different pairs of items (say database records) have different comparison costs. These comparison costs can be arbitrary (in which case no algorithm can be close to optimal (Charikar et al. STOC 2000)), structured (for exam- ple, the comparison cost may depend on the length of the databases (Gupta et al. FOCS 2001)), or stochastic (Angelov et al. LATIN 2008). Motivated by the database setting where the cost depends on the sizes of the items, we consider the problems of sorting and batched predecessor where two non-uniform sets of items A and B are given as input. (1) In the RAM setting, we consider the scenario where both sets have n keys each. The cost to compare two items in A is a, to compare an item of A to an item of B is b, and to compare two items in B is c. We give upper and lower bounds for the case a ≤more »b ≤ c, the case that serves as a warmup for the generalization to the external-memory model. Notice that the case b = 1,a = c = ∞ is the famous “nuts and bolts” problem. ) In the Disk-Access Model (DAM), where transferring elements between disk and internal memory is the main bottleneck, we con- sider the scenario where elements in B are larger than elements in A. The larger items take more I/Os to be brought into memory, consume more space in internal memory, and are required in their entirety for comparisons. A key observation is that the complexity of sorting depends heavily on the interleaving of the small and large items in the final sorted order. If all large elements come after all small elements in the final sorted order, sorting each type separately and concatenating is optimal. However, if the set of predecessors of B in A has size k ≪ n, one must solve an associated batched predecessor problem in order to achieve optimality. We first give output-sensitive lower and upper bounds on the batched predecessor problem, and use these to derive bounds on the complexity of sorting in the two models. Our bounds are tight in most cases, and require novel generalizations of the classical lower bound techniques in external memory to accommodate the non-uniformity of keys.« less