skip to main content

Title: Neuropathic Pain Diagnosis Simulator for Causal Discovery Algorithm Evaluation
Discovery of causal relations from observational data is essential for many disciplines of science and real-world applications. However, unlike other machine learning algorithms, whose development has been greatly fostered by a large amount of available benchmark datasets, causal discovery algorithms are notoriously difficult to be systematically evaluated because few datasets with known ground-truth causal relations are available. In this work, we handle the problem of evaluating causal discovery algorithms by building a flexible simulator in the medical setting. We develop a neuropathic pain diagnosis simulator, inspired by the fact that the biological processes of neuropathic pathophysiology are well studied with well-understood causal influences. Our simulator exploits the causal graph of theneuropathic pain pathology and its parameters in the generator are estimated from real-life patient cases. We show that the data generated from our simulator have similar statistics as real-world data. As a clear advantage, the simulator can produce infinite samples without jeopardizing the privacy of real-world patients. Our simulator provides a natural tool for evaluating various types of causal discovery algorithms, including those to deal with practical issues in causal discovery, such as unknown confounders, selection bias, and missing data. Using our simulator,we have evaluated extensively causal discovery algorithms under more » various settings. « less
Award ID(s):
Publication Date:
Journal Name:
Advances in neural information processing systems
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Causal discovery is an important problem in many sciences that enables us to estimate causal relationships from observational data. Particularly, in the healthcare domain, it can guide practitioners in making informed clinical decisions. Several causal discovery approaches have been developed over the last few decades. The success of these approaches mostly relies on a large number of data samples. In practice, however, an infinite amount of data is never available. Fortunately, often we have some prior knowledge available from the problem domain. Particularly, in healthcare settings, we often have some prior knowledge such as expert opinions, prior RCTs, literature evidence, and systematic reviews about the clinical problem. This prior information can be utilized in a systematic way to address the data scarcity problem. However, most of the existing causal discovery approaches lack a systematic way to incorporate prior knowledge during the search process. Recent advances in reinforcement learning techniques can be explored to use prior knowledge as constraints by penalizing the agent for their violations. Therefore, in this work, we propose a framework KCRL that utilizes the existing knowledge as a constraint to penalize the search process during causal discovery. This utilization of existing information during causal discovery reduces themore »graph search space and enables a faster convergence to the optimal causal mechanism. We evaluated our framework on benchmark synthetic and real datasets as well as on a real-life healthcare application. We also compared its performance with several baseline causal discovery methods. The experimental findings show that penalizing the search process for constraint violation yields better performance compared to existing approaches that do not include prior knowledge.« less
  2. Knowledge graphs (KGs) are of great importance in various artificial intelligence systems, such as question answering, relation extraction, and recommendation. Nevertheless, most real-world KGs are highly incomplete, with many missing relations between entities. To discover new triples (i.e., head entity, relation, tail entity), many KG completion algorithms have been proposed in recent years. However, a vast majority of existing studies often require a large number of training triples for each relation, which contradicts the fact that the frequency distribution of relations in KGs often follows a long tail distribution, meaning a majority of relations have only very few triples. Meanwhile, since most existing large-scale KGs are constructed automatically by extracting information from crowd-sourcing data using heuristic algorithms, plenty of errors could be inevitably incorporated due to the lack of human verification, which greatly reduces the performance for KG completion. To tackle the aforementioned issues, in this paper, we study a novel problem of error-aware few-shot KG completion and present a principled KG completion framework REFORM. Specifically, we formulate the problem under the few-shot learning framework, and our goal is to accumulate meta-knowledge across different meta-tasks and generalize the accumulated knowledge to the meta-test task for error-aware few-shot KG completion. Tomore »address the associated challenges resulting from insufficient training samples and inevitable errors, we propose three essential modules neighbor encoder, cross-relation aggregation, and error mitigation in each meta-task. Extensive experiments on three widely used KG datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed framework REFORM over competitive baseline methods.« less
  3. Identification of causal direction between a causal-effect pair from observed data has recently attracted much attention. Various methods based on functional causal models have been proposed to solve this problem, by assuming the causal process satisfies some (structural) constraints and showing that the reverse direction violates such constraints. The nonlinear additive noise model has been demonstrated to be effective for this purpose, but the model class is not transitive--even if each direct causal relation follows this model, indirect causal influences, which result from omitted intermediate causal variables and are frequently encountered in practice, do not necessarily follow the model constraints; as a consequence, the nonlinear additive noise model may fail to correctly discover causal direction. In this work, we propose a cascade nonlinear additive noise model to represent such causal influences--each direct causal relation follows the nonlinear additive noise model but we observe only the initial cause and final effect. We further propose a method to estimate the model, including the unmeasured intermediate variables, from data, under the variational auto-encoder framework. Our theoretical results show that with our model, causal direction is identifiable under suitable technical conditions on the data generation process. Simulation results illustrate the power of the proposed method in identifyingmore »indirect causal relations across various settings, and experimental results on real data suggest that the proposed model and method greatly extend the applicability of causal discovery based on functional causal models in nonlinear cases.

    « less
  4. Chaudhuri, Kamalika ; Jegelka, Stefanie ; Song, Le ; Szepesvari, Csaba ; Niu, Gang ; Sabato, Sivan (Ed.)
    Traditional causal discovery methods mainly focus on estimating causal relations among measured variables, but in many real-world problems, such as questionnaire-based psychometric studies, measured variables are generated by latent variables that are causally related. Accordingly, this paper investigates the problem of discovering the hidden causal variables and estimating the causal structure, including both the causal relations among latent variables and those between latent and measured variables. We relax the frequently-used measurement assumption and allow the children of latent variables to be latent as well, and hence deal with a specific type of latent hierarchical causal structure. In particular, we define a minimal latent hierarchical structure and show that for linear non-Gaussian models with the minimal latent hierarchical structure, the whole structure is identifiable from only the measured variables. Moreover, we develop a principled method to identify the structure by testing for Generalized Independent Noise (GIN) conditions in specific ways. Experimental results on both synthetic and real-world data show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
  5. Simulators are being increasingly used to train agents before deploying them in real-world environments. While training in simulation provides a cost-effective way to learn, poorly modeled aspects of the simulator can lead to costly mistakes, or blind spots. While humans can help guide an agent towards identifying these error regions, humans themselves have blind spots and noise in execution. We study how learning about blind spots of both can be used to manage hand-off decisions when humans and agents jointly act in the real-world in which neither of them are trained or evaluated fully. The formulation assumes that agent blind spots result from representational limitations in the simulation world, which leads the agent to ignore important features that are relevant for acting in the open world. Our approach for blind spot discovery combines experiences collected in simulation with limited human demonstrations. The first step applies imitation learning to demonstration data to identify important features that the human is using but that the agent is missing. The second step uses noisy labels extracted from action mismatches between the agent and the human across simulation and demonstration data to train blind spot models. We show through experiments on two domains that ourmore »approach is able to learn a succinct representation that accurately captures blind spot regions and avoids dangerous errors in the real world through transfer of control between the agent and the human.« less