An official website of the United States government
Automated program repair holds the potential to significantly reduce software maintenance effort and cost. However, recent studies have shown that it often produces low-quality patches that repair some but break other functionality. We hypothesize that producing patches by replacing likely faulty regions of code with semantically-similar code fragments, and doing so at a higher level of granularity than prior approaches can better capture abstraction and the intended specification, and can improve repair quality. We create SOSRepair, an automated program repair technique that uses semantic code search to replace candidate buggy code regions with behaviorally-similar (but not identical) code written by humans. SOSRepair is the first such technique to scale to real-world defects in real-world systems. On a subset of the ManyBugs benchmark of such defects, SOSRepair produces patches for 23 (35%) of the 65 defects, including 3, 5, and 8 defects for which previous state-of-the-art techniques Angelix, Prophet, and GenProg do not, respectively. On these 23 defects, SOSRepair produces more patches (8, 35%) that pass all independent tests than the prior techniques. We demonstrate a relationship between patch granularity and the ability to produce patches that pass all independent tests. We then show that fault localization precision is a key factor in SOSRepair's success. Manually improving fault localization allows SOSRepair to patch 24 (37%) defects, of which 16 (67%) pass all independent tests. We conclude that (1) higher-granularity, semantic-based patches can improve patch quality, (2) semantic search is promising for producing high-quality real-world defect repairs, (3) research in fault localization can significantly improve the quality of program repair techniques, and (4) semi-automated approaches in which developers suggest fix locations may produce high-quality patches.
more »
« less
Leveraging Program Invariants to Promote Population Diversity in Search-Based Automatic Program Repair
Search-based automatic program repair has shown promise in reducing the cost of defects in real-world software. However, to date, such techniques have typically been most successful when constructing short or single-edit repairs. This is true even when techniques make use of heuristic search strategies, like genetic programming, that in principle support the construction of patches of arbitrary length. One key reason is that the fitness function traditionally depends entirely on test cases, which are poor at identifying partially correct solutions and lead to a fitness landscape with many plateaus. We propose a novel fitness function that optimizes for both functionality and semantic diversity, characterized using learned invariants over intermediate behavior. Our early results show that this new approach improves semantic diversity and fitness granularity, but does not statistically significantly improve repair performance.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1750116
- PAR ID:
- 10135837
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Genetic Improvement (GI)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 2 to 9
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Automated Program Repair (APR) is one of the most recent advances in automated debugging, and can directly fix buggy programs with minimal human intervention. Although various advanced APR techniques (including search-based or semantic-based ones) have been proposed, they mainly work at the source-code level and it is not clear how bytecode-level APR performs in practice. Also, empirical studies of the existing techniques on bugs beyond what has been reported in the original papers are rather limited. In this paper, we implement the first practical bytecode-level APR technique, PraPR, and present the first extensive study on fixing real-world bugs (e.g., Defects4J bugs) using JVM bytecode mutation. The experimental results show that surprisingly even PraPR with only the basic traditional mutators can produce genuine fixes for 17 bugs; with simple additional commonly used APR mutators, PraPR is able to produce genuine fixes for 43 bugs, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art APR, while being over 10X faster. Furthermore, we performed an extensive study of PraPR and other recent APR tools on a large number of additional real-world bugs, and demonstrated the overfitting problem of recent advanced APR tools for the first time. Lastly, PraPR has also successfully fixed bugs for other JVM languages (e.g., for the popular Kotlin language), indicating PraPR can greatly complement existing source-code-level APR.more » « less
-
Static analysis tools have demonstrated effectiveness at finding bugs in real world code. Such tools are increasingly widely adopted to improve software quality in practice. Automated Program Repair (APR) has the potential to further cut down on the cost of improving software quality. However, there is a disconnect between these effective bug-finding tools and APR. Recent advances in APR rely on test cases, making them inapplicable to newly discovered bugs or bugs difficult to test for deterministically (like memory leaks). Additionally, the quality of patches generated to satisfy a test suite is a key challenge. We address these challenges by adapting advances in practical static analysis and verification techniques to enable a new technique that finds and then accurately fixes real bugs without test cases. We present a new automated program repair technique using Separation Logic. At a high-level, our technique reasons over semantic effects of existing program fragments to fix faults related to general pointer safety properties: resource leaks, memory leaks, and null dereferences. The procedure automatically translates identified fragments into source-level patches, and verifies patch correctness with respect to reported faults. In this work we conduct the largest study of automatically fixing undiscovered bugs in real-world code to date. We demonstrate our approach by correctly fixing 55 bugs, including 11 previously undiscovered bugs, in 11 real-world projects.more » « less
-
The search space for automatic program repair approaches is vast and the search for mechanisms to help restrict this search are increasing. We make a granular analysis based on statement kinds to find which statements are more likely to be modified than others when fixing an error. We construct a corpus for analysis by delimiting debugging regions in the provided dataset and recursively analyze the differences between the Simplified Syntax Trees associated with EditEvent's. We build a distribution of statement kinds with their corresponding likelihood of being modified and we validate the usage of this distribution to guide the statement selection. We then build association rules with different confidence thresholds to describe statement kinds commonly modified together for multi-edit patch creation. Finally we evaluate association rule coverage over a held out test set and find that when using a 95% confidence threshold we can create less and more accurate rules that fully cover 93.8% of the testing instances.more » « less
-
Cristea, Alexandra I.; Troussas, Christos (Ed.)Supporting novice programming learners at scale has become a necessity. Such a support generally consists of delivering automated feedback on what and why learners did incorrectly. Existing approaches cast the problem as automatically repairing learners’ incorrect programs; specifically, data-driven approaches assume there exists a correct program provided by other learner that can be extrapolated to repair an incorrect program. Unfortunately, their repair potential, i.e., their capability of providing feedback, is hindered by how they compare programs. In this paper, we propose a flexible program alignment based on program dependence graphs, which we enrich with semantic information extracted from the programs, i.e., operations and calls. Having a correct and an incorrect graphs, we exploit approximate graph alignment to find correspondences at the statement level between them. Each correspondence has a similarity attached to it that reflects the matching affinity between two statements based on topology (control and data flow information) and semantics (operations and calls). Repair suggestions are discovered based on this similarity. We evaluate our flexible approach with respect to rigid schemes over correct and incorrect programs belonging to nine real-world introductory programming assignments. We show that our flexible program alignment is feasible in practice, achieves better performance than rigid program comparisons, and is more resilient when limiting the number of available correct programs.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/GI.2019.00011
