Maximum diversification of data is a central theme in building generalized and accurate machine learning (ML) models. In chemistry, ML has been used to develop models for predicting molecular properties, for example quantum mechanics (QM) calculated potential energy surfaces and atomic charge models. The ANI-1x and ANI-1ccx ML-based general-purpose potentials for organic molecules were developed through active learning; an automated data diversification process. Here, we describe the ANI-1x and ANI-1ccx data sets. To demonstrate data diversity, we visualize it with a dimensionality reduction scheme, and contrast against existing data sets. The ANI-1x data set contains multiple QM properties from 5 M density functional theory calculations, while the ANI-1ccx data set contains 500 k data points obtained with an accurate CCSD(T)/CBS extrapolation. Approximately 14 million CPU core-hours were expended to generate this data. Multiple QM calculated properties for the chemical elements C, H, N, and O are provided: energies, atomic forces, multipole moments, atomic charges, etc. We provide this data to the community to aid research and development of ML models for chemistry.
Computational modeling of chemical and biological systems at atomic resolution is a crucial tool in the chemist’s toolset. The use of computer simulations requires a balance between cost and accuracy: quantum-mechanical methods provide high accuracy but are computationally expensive and scale poorly to large systems, while classical force fields are cheap and scalable, but lack transferability to new systems. Machine learning can be used to achieve the best of both approaches. Here we train a general-purpose neural network potential (ANI-1ccx) that approaches CCSD(T)/CBS accuracy on benchmarks for reaction thermochemistry, isomerization, and drug-like molecular torsions. This is achieved by training a network to DFT data then using transfer learning techniques to retrain on a dataset of gold standard QM calculations (CCSD(T)/CBS) that optimally spans chemical space. The resulting potential is broadly applicable to materials science, biology, and chemistry, and billions of times faster than CCSD(T)/CBS calculations.more » « less
- NSF-PAR ID:
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Nature Communications
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
Hydrazoic acid (HN3) is used as a case study for investigating the accuracy and precision by which a molecular structure—specifically, a semi-experimental equilibrium structure (reSE)—may be determined using current state-of-the-art methodology. The influence of the theoretical corrections for effects of vibration–rotation coupling and electron-mass distribution that are employed in the analysis is explored in detail. The small size of HN3 allowed us to deploy considerable computational resources to probe the basis-set dependence of these corrections using a series of coupled-cluster single, double, perturbative triple [CCSD(T)] calculations with cc-pCVXZ (X = D, T, Q, 5) basis sets. We extrapolated the resulting corrections to the complete basis set (CBS) limit to obtain CCSD(T)/CBS corrections, which were used in a subsequent reSE structure determination. The reSE parameters obtained using the CCSD(T)/cc-pCV5Z corrections are nearly identical to those obtained using the CCSD(T)/CBS corrections, with uncertainties in the bond distances and angles of less than 0.0006 Å and 0.08°, respectively. The previously obtained reSE structure using CCSD(T)/ANO2 agrees with that using CCSD(T)/cc-pCV5Z to within 0.000 08 Å and 0.016° for bond distances and angles, respectively, and with only 25% larger uncertainties, validating the idea that reSE structure determinations can be carried out with significantly smaller basis sets than those needed for similarly accurate, strictly ab initio determinations. Although the purely computational re structural parameters [CCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z] fall outside of the statistical uncertainties (2σ) of the corresponding reSE structural parameters, the discrepancy is rectified by applying corrections to address the theoretical limitations of the CCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z geometry with respect to basis set, electron correlation, relativity, and the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, thereby supporting the contention that the semi-experimental approach is both an accurate and vastly more efficient method for structure determinations than is brute-force computation.more » « less
The many-body expansion (MBE) is promising for the efficient, parallel computation of lattice energies in organic crystals. Very high accuracy should be achievable by employing coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples at the complete basis set limit [CCSD(T)/CBS] for the dimers, trimers, and potentially tetramers resulting from the MBE, but such a brute-force approach seems impractical for crystals of all but the smallest molecules. Here, we investigate hybrid or multi-level approaches that employ CCSD(T)/CBS only for the closest dimers and trimers and utilize much faster methods like Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) for more distant dimers and trimers. For trimers, MP2 is supplemented with the Axilrod–Teller–Muto (ATM) model of three-body dispersion. MP2(+ATM) is shown to be a very effective replacement for CCSD(T)/CBS for all but the closest dimers and trimers. A limited investigation of tetramers using CCSD(T)/CBS suggests that the four-body contribution is entirely negligible. The large set of CCSD(T)/CBS dimer and trimer data should be valuable in benchmarking approximate methods for molecular crystals and allows us to see that a literature estimate of the core-valence contribution of the closest dimers to the lattice energy using just MP2 was overbinding by 0.5 kJ mol−1, and an estimate of the three-body contribution from the closest trimers using the T0 approximation in local CCSD(T) was underbinding by 0.7 kJ mol−1. Our CCSD(T)/CBS best estimate of the 0 K lattice energy is −54.01 kJ mol−1, compared to an estimated experimental value of −55.3 ± 2.2 kJ mol−1.more » « less
We have performed a series of highly accurate calculations between CO2and the 20 naturally occurring amino acids for the investigation of the attractive noncovalent interactions. Different nucleophilic groups present in the amino acid structures were considered (α‐NH2, COOH, side groups), and the stronger binding sites were identified. A database of accurate reference interactions energies was compiled as computed by explicitly‐correlated coupled‐cluster singles‐and‐doubles, together with perturbative triples extrapolated to the complete‐basis‐set limit. The CCSD(F12)(T)/CBS reference values were used for comparing a variety of popular density functionals with different basis sets. Our results show that most density functionals with the triple‐zeta basis set def2‐TZVPP align with the CCSD(F12)(T)/CBS reference values, but errors range from 0.1 kcal/mol up to 1.0 kcal/mol.
The potential energy of molecular species and their conformers can be computed with a wide range of computational chemistry methods, from molecular mechanics to ab initio quantum chemistry. However, the proper choice of the computational approach based on computational cost and reliability of calculated energies is a dilemma, especially for large molecules. This dilemma is proved to be even more problematic for studies that require hundreds and thousands of calculations, such as drug discovery. On the other hand, driven by their pattern recognition capabilities, neural networks started to gain popularity in the computational chemistry community. During the last decade, many neural network potentials have been developed to predict a variety of chemical information of different systems. Neural network potentials are proved to predict chemical properties with accuracy comparable to quantum mechanical approaches but with the cost approaching molecular mechanics calculations. As a result, the development of more reliable, transferable, and extensible neural network potentials became an attractive field of study for researchers. In this review, we outlined an overview of the status of current neural network potentials and strategies to improve their accuracy. We provide recent examples of studies that prove the applicability of these potentials. We also discuss the capabilities and shortcomings of the current models and the challenges and future aspects of their development and applications. It is expected that this review would provide guidance for the development of neural network potentials and the exploitation of their applicability.
This article is categorized under:
Data Science > Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning
Molecular and Statistical Mechanics > Molecular Interactions
Software > Molecular Modeling