skip to main content

Title: Residents’ Perceptions of Behavioral Reference Groups for Personalized Normative Messaging Interventions
Reporting normative feedback to residential energy consumers has been found effective at reducing residential energy consumption. Upon receiving normative feedback households tend to modify their use to become in line with group norms. The effect of normative messages is partially moderated by how personally relevant normative reference groups are to the individual. Advanced energy metering technologies capture households’ energy use patterns, making it possible to generate highly similar and relevant normative reference groups in a non-invasive manner. Unfortunately, it is not well understood how similar individuals are to other group members. It also remains unknown how much individuals identify with behavioral reference groups. Therefore, this research aims to investigate how households perceive behavioral reference groups used in normative comparisons. Survey questionnaires are collected from 2,008 participants using Amazon Mechanical Turk. It is found that while households’ behaviors are more similar when grouped based on energy use profiles than based on geographic proximity, they identify more closely with proximity-based groups. Also, members’ group identification increases as individuals have higher similarity in energy use behaviors with other group members. This implies that enhancing the identity of profile-based behavioral reference groups will lead to an increase in norm adherence, and in turn reductions more » in household energy use. « less
Authors:
Award ID(s):
1705273
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10175383
Journal Name:
Construction Research Congress
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Psychologists hypothesize that the effectiveness of normative messaging interventions increases when individuals have more personal attachment and similarity with reference groups. Using readily available energy consumption data, it is now possible to create highly personalized reference groups based on households’ daily energy use in a non-invasive matter. However, it still remains unclear to what degree individuals perceive behavioral reference groups as a cohesive entity. Therefore, this research investigates how individuals perceive energy profile-based groups relative to more standard geographic proximity-based groups. An online survey is conducted with 1,928 U.S. adults. Individuals do not perceive the profile-based groups as very entitativemore »groups. Also, similarity between energy profile-based group members indirectly affects individuals’ identification with the groups via group entitativity. Lastly, this indirect effect is larger than the direct effect of similarity between group members on group identification. These results imply that a better understanding of what affects group entitativity would allow interveners to create more effective normative feedback messages.« less
  2. Normative messaging interventions have proven to be a cost-effective strategy for promoting pro-environmental behaviors. The effectiveness of normative messages is partially determined by how personally relevant the comparison groups are as well as the lag of feedback. Using readily available energy use data has created opportunities to generate highly personalized reference groups based on households’ behavioral patterns. Unfortunately, it is not well understood how data granularity (e.g., minute, hour) affects the performance of behavioral reference group categorization. This is important because different levels of data granularity can produce conflicting results in terms of group similarity and vary in computational time.more »Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the performance of clustering methods across different levels of temporal granularity of energy use data. A clustering analysis is conducted using one-year of energy use data from 3,000 households in Holland, Michigan. The clustering results show that behavioral reference groups become the most similar when representing households’ energy use behaviors at a six-hour interval. Computationally, less granular data (i.e., six and twelve hours) takes less time than highly granular data which increases exponentially with more households. Considering the enormous scale that normative messaging interventions need to be applied at, using less granular data (six-hour intervals) will permit interveners to maximize the effectiveness of highly personalized normative feedback messages while minimizing computation burdens.« less
  3. Within residences, normative messaging interventions have been gaining interest as a cost-effective way to promote energy-saving behaviors. Behavioral reference groups are one important factor in determining the effectiveness of normative messages. More personally relevant and meaningful groups are likely to promote behavior change. Using readily available energy-use profiles in a non-invasive manner permits the creation of highly personalized reference groups. Unfortunately, how data granularity (e.g., minute and hour) and aggregation (e.g., one week and one month) affect the performance of energy profile-based reference group categorization is not well understood. This research evaluates reference group categorization performance across different levels ofmore »data granularity and aggregation. We conduct a clustering analysis using one-year of energy use data from 2248 households in Holland, Michigan USA. The clustering analysis reveals that using six-hour intervals results in more personalized energy profile-based reference groups compared to using more granular data (e.g., 15 min). This also minimizes computational burdens. Further, aggregating energy-use data over all days of twelve weeks increases the group similarity compared to less aggregated data (e.g., weekdays of twelve weeks). The proposed categorization framework enables interveners to create personalized and scalable normative feedback messages.« less
  4. Honey bees are social insects that live in large groups called colonies, within structures known as hives. The young adult bees stay within the hive to build nests and care for the young, while the older bees leave the hive to forage for food. Honey bees store food and other valuable resources in their hives, so they are often targeted by predators, parasites and ‘robber’ bees from other colonies. Therefore, it is important for bees to determine whether individuals trying to enter the nest are group members or intruders. While it is known that social insects use blends of waxymore »chemicals called cuticular hydrocarbons to identify group members at the entrance to the colony, it is not clear how members of the same colony acquire a similar blend of cuticular hydrocarbons. Some previous work suggested that in some ant species (which are also social insects), colony members exchange cuticular hydrocarbons with each other so that all members of the colony are covered with a similar blend of chemicals. However, it was not known whether honey bees also share cuticular hydrocarbons between colony members in order to identify members of a hive. Vernier et al. used chemical, molecular and behavioral approaches to study the cuticular hydrocarbons found on honey bees. The results show that, rather than exchanging chemicals with other members of their colony, individual bees make their own blends of cuticular hydrocarbons. As a bee ages it makes different blends of cuticular hydrocarbons, and by the time it starts to leave the hive to forage it makes a blend that is specific to the colony it belongs to. The production of this final blend is influenced by the environment within the hive. Thus, the findings of Vernier et al. indicate that honey bees guarding the entrance to a hive can only identify non-colony-member forager bees as intruders, rather than any non-colony-member bee that happens upon the hive entrance. Honey bees play an essential role in pollinating many crop plants so understanding how these insects maintain their social groups may help to improve agriculture in the future. Furthermore, this work may aid our understanding of how other social insects interact in a variety of biological situations.« less
  5. Rosenfeld, Cheryl S. (Ed.)
    Pair-bonding allows for division of labor across behavioral tasks such as protecting a territory, caring for pups or foraging for food. However, how these labor divisions are determined, whether they are simply intrinsic differences in the individual’s behavior or a coordinated behavioral response by the pair, remains unknown. We used the monogamous, biparental and territorial California mouse ( Peromyscus californicus ) to study how behavioral approach to an aggressive vocal stimulus in a novel environment was affected by pair-bonding. Using a three-chambered vocal playback paradigm, we first measured the amount of time individuals spent in close proximity to aggressive barkmore »vocalizations. We found that animals could be categorized as either approachers or avoiders. We then paired individuals based on their initial approach behavior to an opposite sex individual who displayed either similar or different approach behaviors. These pairs were then retested for approach behavior as a dyad 10–11 days post-pairing. This test found that pairs showed convergence in their behavioral responses, such that pairs who were mismatched in their approach behaviors became more similar, and pairs that were matched remained so. Finally, we analyzed the ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) produced and found that pairs produced significantly more USVs than individuals. Importantly, increased USV production correlated with increasing behavioral convergence of pairs. Taken together, this study shows that pair-bonded animals alter their approach behaviors to coordinate their response with their partner and that vocal communication may play a role in coordinating these behavioral responses. Overall, our findings indicate that pair-bonding generates an emergent property in pairs, adjusting their combined approach behavior towards a new aggressive stimulus representing a potential challenge to the bonded pair. Such findings may be broadly important for social bonding in other social systems.« less