An official website of the United States government
Abstract Progress in the field of ecological stoichiometry has demonstrated that the outcome of ecological interactions can often be predicted a priori based on the nutrient ratios (e.g., carbon: nitrogen: phosphorus, C:N:P) of interacting organisms. However, the challenges of accurately measuring the nutrient content of active parasites within hosts has limited our ability to rigorously apply ecological stoichiometry to host–parasite systems. Traditional nutrient analyses require high parasite biomasses, often preventing individual‐level analyses. This prevents researchers from estimating variation in the nutrient content of individual parasites within a single host infrapopulation, a critical factor that could define how the ecology of the parasite affects the host–parasite interaction. Here, we explain how energy dispersive technology, a technique currently used to measure the elemental content of free‐living microbes, can be adapted for parasitic microbial infrapopulations. We demonstrate the power of accurately quantifying the biomass stoichiometry of individual microbial parasites sampled directly from individual hosts. Using this approach, we show that the stoichiometric composition of two microbial parasites capable of infecting the same host are stoichiometrically distinct and respond to host diet quality differently. We also demonstrate that characteristics of the stoichiometric trait distributions of these infrapopulations were important predictors of host fecundity, a proxy for virulence in this system, and better predictors of parasite load than the mean parasite stoichiometry or our parasite and diet treatments alone. EDS provides a rigorous tool for applying ecological stoichiometry to host–parasite systems and enables researchers to explore the nutritional physiology of host–parasite interactions at a scale that is more relevant to the ecology and evolution of the system than traditional nutrient analyses. Here we demonstrate that this level of resolution provides useful insights into the diet‐dependent physiology of microbial parasites and their hosts. We anticipate that this improved level of resolution has the potential to elucidate a range of eco–evo interactions in host–parasite systems that were previously unobservable.
more »
« less
Ecological context influences evolution in host-parasite interactions: insights from the Daphnia-parasite model system
Parasites exert strong selective pressure on their hosts, and many hosts can evolve rapidly in response. As such, host-parasite interactions have a special place in the study of contemporary evolution. However, these interactions are often considered in isolation from the ecological contexts in which they occur. Here we review different ways in which the ecological context of host-parasite interactions can modulate their evolutionary outcomes in important and sometimes unexpected ways. Specifically, we highlight how predation, competition, and abiotic factors change the outcome of contemporary evolution for both hosts and parasites. In doing so, we focus on insights gained from the Daphnia-microparasite system. This system has emerged as a model system for understanding the ecology and evolution of host-parasite interactions, and has provided important insights into how ecological context influences contemporary evolution.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10180123
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Evolution in Action: Past, Present and Future
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 289-307
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Abstract An animal's social behaviour both influences and changes in response to its parasites. Here we consider these bidirectional links between host social behaviours and parasite infection, both those that occur from ecological vs evolutionary processes. First, we review how social behaviours of individuals and groups influence ecological patterns of parasite transmission. We then discuss how parasite infection, in turn, can alter host social interactions by changing the behaviour of both infected and uninfected individuals. Together, these ecological feedbacks between social behaviour and parasite infection can result in important epidemiological consequences. Next, we consider the ways in which host social behaviours evolve in response to parasites, highlighting constraints that arise from the need for hosts to maintain benefits of sociality while minimizing fitness costs of parasites. Finally, we consider how host social behaviours shape the population genetic structure of parasites and the evolution of key parasite traits, such as virulence. Overall, these bidirectional relationships between host social behaviours and parasites are an important yet often underappreciated component of population-level disease dynamics and host–parasite coevolution.more » « less
-
Abstract Spatial aggregation of environmental or trophically transmitted parasites has the potential to influence host–parasite interactions. The distribution of parasites on hosts is one result of those interactions, and the role of spatial aggregation is unclear. We use a spatially explicit agent‐based model to determine how spatial aggregation of parasites influences the distribution of parasite burdens across a range of parasite densities and host recovery rates. Our model simulates the random movement of hosts across landscapes with varying spatial configurations of areas occupied by environmental parasites, allowing hosts to acquire parasites they encounter and subsequently lose them. When parasites are more spatially aggregated in the environment, the aggregation of parasite burdens on hosts is higher (i.e., more hosts with few parasites, fewer hosts with many parasites), but the effect is less pronounced at high parasite density and fast host recovery rates. In addition, the correlation between individual hosts' final parasite burdens and their cumulative parasite burdens (including lost parasites) is greater at higher levels of spatial parasite aggregation. Our work suggests that fine‐scale spatial patterns of parasites can play a strong role in shaping how hosts are parasitized, particularly when parasite density is low‐to‐moderate and recovery rates are slow.more » « less
-
Abstract Virulence, the degree to which a pathogen harms its host, is an important but poorly understood aspect of host-pathogen interactions. Virulence is not static, instead depending on ecological context and potentially evolving rapidly. For instance, at the start of an epidemic, when susceptible hosts are plentiful, pathogens may evolve increased virulence if this maximizes their intrinsic growth rate. However, if host density declines during an epidemic, theory predicts evolution of reduced virulence. Although well-studied theoretically, there is still little empirical evidence for virulence evolution in epidemics, especially in natural settings with native host and pathogen species. Here, we used a combination of field observations and lab assays in theDaphnia-Pasteuriamodel system to look for evidence of virulence evolution in nature. We monitored a large, naturally occurring outbreak ofPasteuria ramosainDaphnia dentifera, where infection prevalence peaked at ~ 40% of the population infected and host density declined precipitously during the outbreak. In controlled infections in the lab, lifespan and reproduction of infected hosts was lower than that of unexposed control hosts and of hosts that were exposed but not infected. We did not detect any significant changes in host resistance or parasite infectivity, nor did we find evidence for shifts in parasite virulence (quantified by host lifespan and number of clutches produced by hosts). However, over the epidemic, the parasite evolved to produce significantly fewer spores in infected hosts. While this finding was unexpected, it might reflect previously quantified tradeoffs: parasites in high mortality (e.g., high predation) environments shift from vegetative growth to spore production sooner in infections, reducing spore yield. Future studies that track evolution of parasite spore yield in more populations, and that link those changes with genetic changes and with predation rates, will yield better insight into the drivers of parasite evolution in the wild.more » « less
-
Social interactions with conspecifics are key to the fitness of most animals and, through the transmission opportunities they provide, are also key to the fitness of their parasites. As a result, research to date has largely focused on the role of host social behavior in imposing selection on parasites, particularly their virulence and transmission phenotypes. However, host social behavior also influences the distribution of parasites among hosts, with implications for their evolution through non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift, and thus ability to respond to that selection. Here, we review the paucity of empirical studies on parasites, and draw from empirical studies of free-living organisms and population genetic theory to propose several mechanisms by which host social behavior potentially drives parasite evolution through these less-well studied mechanisms. We focus on the guppy host and Gyrodactylus (Monogenea) ectoparasitic flatworm system and follow a spatially hierarchical outline to highlight that social behavior varies between individuals, and between host populations across the landscape, generating a mosaic of ecological and evolutionary outcomes for their infecting parasites. We argue that the guppy-Gyrodactylus system presents a unique opportunity to address this fundamental knowledge gap in our understanding of the connection between host social behavior and parasite evolution. Individual differences in host social behavior generates fine-scale changes in the spatial distribution of parasite genotypes, shape the size, and diversity of their infecting parasite populations and may generate non-random mating on, and non-random transmission between hosts. While at population and metapopulation level, variation in host social behavior interacts with landscape structure to affect parasite gene flow, effective population size, and genetic drift to alter the coevolutionary potential of local adaptation.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39831-6_21
